Sacrifice Your Lifespan to Grow Stronger

The setting of this novel is so broken It is said that killing bad guys has merit. Killing a gangster leader costs 100 points, but a murder dealer only has 30 points. Note that this trafficker sold many children. In the article, he sold nearly 30 children in one transaction, once a month. The merits gained by killing such a super evil person cannot even compare to that of a gangster leader. The author just broke the setting in order to keep the level up.

I have just read a few chapters, and the plot is too blunt. The male protagonist is like a fool, and Mao has no strength at all. He goes around clamoring to avenge his elder brother. Isn't this looking for death?

As a time traveler, your brother died in the line of duty, and his family received no compensation. He had to be hunted down, and the male protagonist had to lick this rotten government office. It's only a few chapters long, so a child must have some logic when playing house.

I've finished reading it, I've invested, and my level is in line with a fifth-level writer.

I have a question. You wrote about Pig's Feet in such a miserable way, and the world is so dangerous and life-threatening. Why is Pig's Feet unwilling to trade his lifespan for force? If you had traded your lifespan earlier, you wouldn't have wasted three years, causing your brother to commit suicide after he was killed. I can't do anything about it, and I regret it. Let me ask you a question here. Do you think you should live the life of a master for ten years comfortably, or are you frightened and afraid that your life will be gone at some point, and you will live a miserable life without a meal? I don't know how you chose. If it were me, I would choose the former, because in that cannibal world, I don't want to be unable to resist when something happens. Even if I am killed, I will admit it, because I resisted and I tried my best. I have no regrets. I don't want to be unable to resist when something happens. I don't have the ability to resist, and I'm left to be slaughtered. I would rather live a life of being a master for even five years than leave my life in the hands of others and live a miserable life of being frightened, hungry, and then killed at will without knowing when disaster will fall from the sky.

He wrote about the poor people at the bottom, very miserable, but there are still so many people alive. Logically speaking, this world is. There should be very few people at the bottom.

It's very well written. I didn't want to read it when I saw the review, but after reading it, I realized it's a really good book.

I don't agree with the Dharma couple's wealth and land mentioned in the book. The Dharma land of wealth couple is correct. All four are indispensable, but wealth comes first, because when you have a lot of money, you can ask the best teacher or fellow Taoist to teach you, you can buy better exercises, and you can rent or buy a better practice location. Wealth is one of the most important things in any world, so there is a saying that money can make the world go round.

I was quite looking forward to it at the beginning of the introduction, but when the merits appeared at the end, I didn't want to read it anymore. Who decides what is right and wrong? What you think is right is actually wrong in the eyes of others, not to mention the way of heaven. Perhaps Heaven would rather hope that all human beings die or become savage animals. I have been turning to the starting point of merit for so long. Regardless of whether it is a great author or a great author, after all, I am writing a novel from the perspective of one person. How can I write a good merit. Just like demons eating humans, you think it is wrong, but from a racial standpoint, there is nothing wrong with demons. After all, people who are not from my race must have different hearts. Also, there is good and there is bad. What about karma? There is nothing wrong with a pig like Zhao. If you kill it and eat it, will it be detrimental to your merits? Merit is about people. I feel that writing about merit is not as good as writing about luck. For example, everyone has his own luck. If you kill, you will kill and plunder, and you will plunder. After all, you are a fantasy of the jungle and the strong. But no one writes about merit well. At most, the best score is 55 and half, especially since most people hate that people who stand on the highest moral level do murder.

The setting is disgusting, the writing is okay, the plot is average, the protagonist's strength line is confusing, and it is written without any thought. It is disgusting. In summary, it is tasteless and it is a pity to abandon it.