High-Tech Wonders Begin with a Liberal Arts Student

Keep it up! We've started school, and it's six days a week, so we can't study. I'll give the cat 100 points as a reward. I'm just a poor student with no money. If possible, could you please mark this as a featured post?

Fine, you can write a story without a female lead, but I don't understand why you had to include so many disgusting female supporting characters! It was one thing to start with Rong Shishi and Zhu Qian, but then Zhou Niang appeared—I'm disgusted! I came to see some high-tech gadgets, not to watch a vicious female supporting character and a cowardly female student's self-redemption.

Keep writing, author! There's no female lead. I've given you all my recommendation votes for today.

I suggest the author stop writing conflicts. First, there's the two girls, Rong and Zhu, who have cerebral palsy; then there's the delinquent alumnus he met while staying at school during the holidays; next, there's the female classmate who committed suicide; then there's the disabled, delusional, righteous hacker...

The premise of this book is excellent, but I don't understand why you insist on focusing on literature. Wouldn't it be faster and better to stick to science? Why are you making a fuss about literature? What's the point? As a novice novelist, you can't have toxic elements in the early stages; otherwise, it will be difficult to quickly gain a fanbase. I hope the author can correct these flaws quickly. Change them while it's still early on, otherwise, this book might flop.

The book's opening sequence, where the protagonist explores his cheat ability and restrains his desire to play games, using learning to test the jar's power, along with his later contemplation of the consequences of losing his cheat and the resulting motivation, all convey a profound sense of realism.

If you want to see exactly what has been changed, start from 56 and watch it again. If you don't want to reread it, just read chapter 63, which is the new story! I'm sorry, I accept your feedback. It's not good to change the plot on Twitter, but I've been getting so much criticism these past few days that I'm almost depressed. I admit it's okay if that part of the story is removed.

This... I originally wanted to support it more, but I couldn't stand it anymore, so I reluctantly moved it from my "relief supplies" list to my "not really interested in reading" list 😥. Although readers shouldn't randomly "teach" authors how to write, I feel something's off now, and there are roughly these problems: the main plot is too weak (I still can't see it), there are too many side plots…

I couldn't access it yesterday... The two images today were from the previously set automatic updates.

This realistic portrayal is giving me a headache. Your focus should be on the use of superpowers and subtle displays of superiority, not on blatantly lowering the intelligence of supporting characters and forcibly creating conflict. I completely don't understand your point.