The Galaxy

If this book were like Eunuch Rainbow without Little Chirp

I took a quick look at a few pictures and took a look at them. This book must be eunuch. If you become a eunuch, please dig up my grave. If not, please give me a stick of incense.

When did authors start to become so bad at writing about people? After reading more than thirty chapters, the protagonist is a pioneer and one of the first space force captains. His wife is sick and he can't even get out 5 million, so he has to sell himself to the government for five years to borrow it. After saving two national treasures and hundreds of lives, he became a hero. The protagonist gave up his credit and rewards and applied for 10 million to save his wife. Isn't this something that the government should take the initiative to do? Let the heroes have no worries. Is the national treasure only worth 10 million? Later, when the protagonist is asked to perform a protection mission, he even threatens to kill one of the protagonists, and the promise of treatment does not count. Even if this is an imaginary history, it should be more reliable. It doesn't matter if you want to write something touching or to torture people, but you have to do a good job in dealing with the aftermath of the abuse. It is said that after the storm, there is a rainbow. If you insist on not having an IQ online, don't say others scold you. I will order this book when I see it on the shelves. I hope the new book will be as good as Earth Era.

The science fiction part is well written, but the emotional scenes dissuaded me. Author, you can write hard science fiction without adding emotional scenes. Do you think there are any in The Three-Body Problem?

Super Battleship is so great. If you write cool articles based on it, it will definitely sell well. Why do you have to stick to your own opinions? Wouldn't it be enough to wait until you make money writing cool articles before writing the genre you like? Since writing a book is for everyone to read, it must be in line with the tastes of the vast majority of people. If you want to make money, you must cater to the market. If you want to write a book according to your own preferences and also want the public to like it, how can you achieve good results? I felt very depressing after reading this book. I don't plan to continue reading it. I feel uncomfortable at all. I read it for entertainment, not to make myself depressed.

This chapter says there is a word limit, so I'll leave it here. Seeing this, I want to sigh with emotion. The initial breakthrough point has finally appeared. In more than sixty chapters, the initial situation has been almost introduced. I am not a book writer, so I can't comment on the use of writing such as story structure. But from the perspective of a reader like me, I can see it. The author wants to flesh out each character, but feels that his skill is still a little lacking, or that he has used other literary styles incorrectly in the science fiction text, which makes the plot seem a bit draggy. If you read it in one go, you may not think it is a big deal, but the situation of one update a day will make readers anxious and impatient. This usage is not suitable for the update frequency of online articles. If this book is a physical book and can be read in one sitting, it will be really enjoyable, just like the first part of The Three-Body Problem. Reading it in one sitting, readers can have a good understanding of Ye Wenjie's pitiful and hateful character. However, if it is really made into a chapter with thousands of words, it will be difficult for readers to resonate. Combined with the thoughts expressed by the author a few days ago, I can see that Rainbow has worked hard to develop this writing technique, and has deleted many character story lines, which makes the subsequent story lines a bit messy, which is a pity. It can only be said that the fault that caused the current situation is not the fault of the author or the readers, but the fast food culture that has led to such results. Novels that rely on word count and subscriptions are not suitable for this style of writing. Novels with 100,000 words may not necessarily be popular, but novels with millions of words will definitely make money. Finally, let me say, come on, Rainbow! I look forward to your more and more exciting performances!

This book is only suitable for physical books. It is thick, heavy, depressing, angry, and arouses all kinds of emotions. Unfortunately, it is an online article that is read for relaxation and pleasure. How many people are willing to read quasi-entities?

This book, like the previous Earth Era, is a sacred book in my opinion, and can even be compared with Liu's The Three-Body Problem. This book is not like some hard science fiction novels, such as: The Black Technology System of a Top Scholar, Die on Mars. This kind of novel, which is purely composed of physical terms, uses another way to outline the future of the earth and mankind, especially in terms of human nature. It focuses on describing the handling methods of human civilization when encountering crises, and compares the macro choices of the entire civilization to the individual micro world choices. It can be enlightening and thought-provoking. If the end of the world crisis really comes. When you come here, you are the protagonist in this book. How will you choose, whether to go crazy for desire like Arthur, or to retreat into the mountains and forests like Jian Ya, or to sacrifice your youth and life for the entire human civilization like Chen Luo. All of this makes people think endlessly. In short, if you are a person who really likes science fiction, this book must not be missed. Finally, thank you to Rainbow Gate for writing such a touching science fiction masterpiece! !

To be honest, I'm extremely disappointed. Writing science fiction doesn't mean you can write about a short-tempered hero and a long-lasting love between a son and a daughter, but it needs to be reasonable. The personal needs of a hero who has made major meritorious deeds, and the reasonable needs cannot be met? Incredible. Not to mention anything else, the organization must first help solve individual practical problems, and only then can it be said that "you cannot negotiate conditions with the organization." Many hardships are too deliberate and unreal. No book is written without coincidences, but excessive use of coincidences will greatly reduce the appeal of the work and make others feel that it would be fine as long as there were no coincidences. I am very doubtful whether this is really Caihong himself, or whether someone purchased Caihong's identity and posted under his name.

Seeing embarrassing emotional drama and childish political thoughts, goodbye