After Humanity Lost the Ability to Reproduce

What is logical self-consistency? If Liu were to write it, these people would all have to receive the elite education that pours into the whole world when they are born, and a large proportion of it is biologically oriented. The biggest task in the world is to teach them and develop automatic robots over and over again. If the older generation dies, they will need to continue to research and overcome the insurmountable problems. For the problem of infertility, they must do this even if they have not found the direction. They cannot be distracted by eating and drinking, and they do not need the seven emotions and six desires of the world. All the means of production are taken care of by automatic robots. If this group of people grows up, they will continue to awaken some of them, passing on from generation to generation until they find the answer. College entrance examination? There is no way this thing still exists!

The author, I am a terminally ill patient. How many chapters does the author plan to write in total? I will calculate whether I have the life to finish it. If the author plans to write a thousand chapters, please give me a spoiler. Don't worry, I'll take the spoilers to my grave.

A future human civilization that can land on Mars will not increase individual life span after losing fertility, will not develop large-scale artificial intelligence to replace human work, and will not have adult freezing technology. It will only freeze fetuses and be born in batches. When the population drops to one billion, it will still require a lot of labor to maintain production. I also live in Bengbu, where is your unmanned factory? Where is your robot? If you are still afraid of tigers in the wild, where is your drone? Why not freeze technicians early in a disaster?

They are all talking about settings, and I am talking about the flaws in archeology and meteorological knowledge First, the same sacrificial pit or tomb pit. From top to bottom, history goes from recent to far. According to the plot in the article, if you are fertile at first, you will sacrifice the stone plate with the baby; if you are unable to give birth later, you will sacrifice the stone plate with the baby disappearing. Then what is dug out must be the moon in which the baby disappears first, and then the baby is completely in the moon. The reverse is true in the text. If the ancient civilizations were not thrown in according to time, but were piled up and thrown in all at once, it would be even less possible for the excavation sequence to be completely consistent with the protagonist's logic as mentioned in the article, but the time would be chaotic. Especially since it is said later that this civilization maintained its sacrificial state for decades, there must be a specific timeline to support it. There is no problem that different time points appear in different tombs in the following article Secondly, the weather is now monitored by global weather satellites. Anyone can only monitor the climate of the gathering place. I didn't see in the article that satellites would be out of action even in the end of the world Most of the time, weather forecasts do not rely on local monitoring. For example, our country relies more on the reanalysis of cloud images obtained by meteorological satellites such as "Fengyun-1" In large-scale conditions such as meteorology, we can not only see local changes. The more obvious ones, such as typhoons, can be seen directly through cloud images obtained from satellites. The forecast may be more accurate with various local monitoring stations, but it does not mean that without these, decades of meteorological data will be missing. So the introduction logic of at least two chapters cannot withstand scrutiny (But I may not have read carefully, so I am sorry if I am wrong, I just feel that this logical error should not appear, and I couldn't help but leave a comment after reading it halfway)

I just found out that the author is Rainbow Gate. I've read a few chapters, but I think there are a lot of things that don't make sense. First, the other party did not use direct violent means to exterminate human beings, which proves that the other party is not strong enough. Second, other animals and plants will not be affected. The other party wants a complete earth's ecology. Then it wouldn't be a bad idea to threaten the entire earth once humanity is finished. Humans cannot explode stars, but there should be no problem in destroying the entire ecology. Biological weapons and chemical weapons are really not possible, but it can be done by having a few asteroids hit the earth. I would venture to guess that the enemy should be Gaia consciousness or something like that. Definitely not aliens. If aliens come to Earth, they can crush humanity like ants without having to wait tens or hundreds of years. Humanity should emigrate to outer space and completely exterminate the earth's ecology. Humanity can definitely do this kind of thing in order to continue, and it's not like nuclear deterrence has never been done before.

(The end of the world is coming: Human beings are sterilized, and only I have the ability to reproduce)

We underestimate the human instinct for survival. Just locking human fertility proves the intervention of a supernatural system. Countless possibilities such as mechanical ascension, soul extraction, cross-species reproduction, and world travel will all be unlocked. The instinct is to look down on the human survival mechanism.

I believe it was fate that we met again. I just finished reading your Battleship and I was deeply touched. After reading it, I didn't know what to say. I found this place through the Internet. I didn't expect that you still have novels that you are serializing. I'm really excited, I must follow up! I hope we can have a good life together in the future, come on!

To be honest, we clearly know that there will be no one in the future, so why not research on unmanned devices, AI assistance, voice control devices, exoskeletons and other devices. And in just 60 years, has the world run out of inventory? The country mothballs old equipment every year. Even the bridges have to rely on intangible cultural heritage, and supercomputing has to stop?

What have humans been doing these past 60 years? Eating for free? Automatic equipment and intelligent robots have not developed at all?