Cyberpunk: Interstellar Apocalypse

Personally, I think it's pretty good. The plot isn't particularly new, but it's well written. There are no inconsistencies, logical conflicts, or loopholes in world attributes. If you like this type, you can keep it and follow up. If it doesn't crash in the follow-up, there's nothing wrong with the quality.

Do you just plan to stay on the thug route? How many chapters have it taken to reach this point of progress? The old network is not dug, the secrets are ignored, and even the golden finger presses it again and again. The author has the network cable when he needs it, and when he doesn't, he just goes offline and lets the protagonist fight hand-to-hand. I can only say that there is no poisonous point on the whole, but there is no explosive point. As a carrier of Internet articles, boredom is more deadly than poisonous points.

I read it in one go. It is quite well written, with a full sense of the future. Various settings are also very complete. The characters are delicately drawn. The supporting characters and characters have complete personalities. The writing is also good. I hope the author will publish more. Come on.

Which big shot came here to write a book in a vest?

I hope the author doesn't create too many conflicts, contradictory world views, and inconsistent preface and follower. It's perfect as it is now.

You write a little less every day, even though it's three chapters

It's well written. The cyber world view includes hackers and drones. Gold Finger has a certain sense of fun but does not destroy the balance. Making money by completing tasks is just a series of small goals and small climaxes, but there is no long-term goal and the writing is too watery. There are too many equipment updates and useless background descriptions.

I have finished reading it all. The biggest problem is that the character portrayal is flawed and the tool man phenomenon is a bit serious The second is the worldview problem. It is good so far. It does not matter if I copy 2077, and I can also see that the author has his own thoughts, such as the description of the hacker battle But the problem lies in the development of the worldview. After all, after leaving Mars, it will be an original worldview. If there is no new idea, it will not be good Let me make an analogy. The earth is the mother planet, and it cannot be dominated by companies. People are divided into three levels. Mars, the general tone cannot be changed, but there must be some new ideas For example, add in postmodernism, Marian worldview, multiculturalism and other cesspits, and then everyone does dark things in private, with all kinds of power above, and the protagonist will be killed just because he blocks the way. Targeting it seems like being the enemy of the world Then add some 007 squeeze or something The worldview beyond Mars and Earth is also very important. After all, it is far away from the earth, and there must be a more inhumane system For reference only

Recently, 2077 was on sale. After playing for 60 hours, I came across this book. It's quite right, but it's a pity that there are too few.

In fact, I am quite curious about what this GG computing power unit describes? There are already many concepts of computing power, but none of them feel like this GG: 1. FLOPS: Floating point operations per second ➩Commonly found in CPU, GPU, and supercomputing. When comparing, you also need to look at the accuracy: FP64, FP32, FP16, BF16, etc. The computing power of the same chip with different precisions varies greatly. 2. OPS: operations per second TOPS = 10¹² OPS (one trillion operations per second) ➩Commonly found in NPU, mobile phone AI, edge AI chips, often labeled INT8 TOPS, INT4 TOPS. 3. Mining hashing power H/s: Number of hashes per second ➩ Different currencies have different algorithms, and the computing power cannot be directly compared. 4. Traditional instruction computing power: MIPS / DMIPS MIPS: Millions of instructions per second DMIPS: General-purpose integer/control flow performance ➩Embedded/CPU old indicators. In the context of computing power, MIPS is an old unit of CPU general instruction performance; another meaning is the MIPS instruction set architecture. DMIPS is a traditional computing power indicator that measures the "universal integer performance" of the CPU 5. Quantum computing related: Qubit: number of qubits, not a unit of computing power CLOPS: quantum circuit layer operations/second It seems not, so I am very curious. 🤔