The Final Abyss

My 4-year-old cousin came to visit and I helped him take a bath. This was a call from my girlfriend. She turned on the speakerphone because her hands were inconvenient. He asked me what I was doing. I said I was helping my brother take a bath. Then she suddenly changed her tone and said with a wicked smile, "Wash it clean. I will eat it when I come back in the evening." Then my cousin was so frightened that he cried and didn't dare to sleep all night.

When watching the first battle royale plot, the author seemed to want to make the protagonist a wise and courageous person, but the protagonist's way of thinking was very "taken for granted". The first point is that when the protagonist encounters a door that cannot be opened in the laboratory, his thought is "There is no meaning in a task that cannot be completed, so there must be a way." For this reasoning to be true, two conditions need to be met: 1. The behavior of the Lord God is meaningful, and 2. Meaningful tasks can possibly be completed. If either of these two points is not satisfied, this reasoning will not be valid. For example, the main god may have played a game of playing poison to amuse people. It is meaningless and has no intention of letting anyone survive to complete the task. . The second point is that the protagonist finds that only one of the people he has met is underage, and he judges that "this game only involves adults, so that girl must be an NPC." 1. The premise is wrong. You have only seen about half of the contestants, so you can directly judge that the ones you have never met are all adults? Even so, should we simply rule out the possibility that a minor will be randomly selected in this round? 2. Assuming that the premise is correct, then the premise and conclusion constitute a circular argument. "Only adults participate in the game" can deduce "Minors are NPCs", and "Minors are NPCs" can deduce "Only adults can participate in the game." Therefore, they express the same meaning and do not constitute a causal relationship. Author, why don't you make the protagonist a reckless man? The novel about being reckless is quite interesting.

One thing to note, my reading list recommended that the main character has a high IQ, so I was looking forward to it. But the fact is that the author did not write down the protagonist's IQ. If forcibly lowering the IQ of the people around you in order to raise the protagonist's IQ in a disguised way counts... Although I also know that it is difficult to write. The protagonist is an old man in his seventies, who has also traveled through time and experienced various glories or despair in life. But he still looks like a hot-blooded or middle-aged boy, pretending to be cold and mature but very poorly. He feels resentful when being bullied by a strong person, and handles all kinds of things badly, including transactions, communication... When I say so many bad things, I don't mean that the book is bad. At least the original plot is worthy of encouragement. It's just that it really shouldn't be read as a book with a high IQ. It would be more appropriate to read it as a passionate book that imagines the main character's background setting as that of a young boy in his twenties.

We sincerely invite you to guess the ending of Wang Mang. Xianyu has already agreed. Whoever guesses it will update it three times. Don't miss it if you pass by⁽⁽◝( ˙ ꒳ ˙ )◜⁾⁾

If you were asked to gnaw at the large army, you wouldn't be able to gnaw at it. By speculating on the back line, you may succeed, but in the end you may ruin all your troops. So you can only attack the state where one of the eighteen princes is located, and force the princes to fall apart based on the conflicts between them!

The writing was not good in the first few dozen chapters. The plot developed too fast and was like a running account, but the plot was good. Later, the writing became a little more mature, but when I met the sister, the protagonist's IQ instantly became 0. He can do nothing except anger, and the character is an old man in his 70s. I can't stand the single character just because of this character. You have to know that the higher the status, the more women there are. Don't talk about soldiers not needing wives or women. People who say this can only prove that they have no brains. In reality, soldiers are looking forward to getting married and having children. Generals, do you think there are any bachelors? And if you want to climb to a high position, you need the support of connections. Even if you don't like the woman, you still have to marry her.

The introduction of this book is confusing. Obviously, ghosts and monsters have become a time-traveling novel. There is no point in reading the catalog! Who would go in and take a look at the writing?

I originally wanted to read it, but then I saw that the comments were lame? Don't look! Next one!

It's a good book, but the author stopped updating it for a long time, and then every update was like a running account squeezed out from between the teeth.

A new chapter has appeared, how can we stand still 😂