Beastmon Arena

The title of the book always refers to the Arena of Obscene Beasts

Pokémon skills have cooldowns. What a huge failure. What to do if all skills are cooled down. Using fists equals grabbing. No. Using your feet equals kicking. No. Using the body and head equals hitting. They are all skills. Nope either. As a target?

Charmander's attribute is fire, dragon? Fossil pterosaur, Boscodora is a quasi-god? Why do you feel that the author has not read it? ?

The subject matter is excellent, the writing is average, and my understanding of Pokémon is not as good as that of a primary school student. I don't know the most basic classification of legendary Pokémon, quasi-gods, and mythical beasts. The attributes of Pokémon are also wrong. To be honest, the author probably only watched dozens of episodes of Pokémon before he dared to write. Otherwise, he would have written even the lowest attributes wrong and he still doesn't know Baidu.

Wind Speed ​​Dog is not a legendary Pokémon, and Riding Dragon is not a dragon type 😅

Old Pokmon fans can quit. The author is a newbie and didn't check the information. Many Pokmon attributes were written incorrectly. Boss Cordora and Fossil Pteranodon actually turned into quasi-gods. The Glitter Nut Ball has a strong characteristic that is comparable to low-level mythical beasts. I challenge my lower limit like crazy. Even Daigo's Glitter Metagross can't beat it. How dare you, a junk race Hazel Nut Ball, defeat the divine beast by self-destruction? ? ? To be honest, it's not scary if you don't understand. What's scary is that you don't even know the attributes of a Pokémon and don't check it out.

The novel is pretty good, but... . . Why the Sword and Sorcery category. . . And I feel that the name does not reflect the theme of the book very well and cannot attract people who like this genre to click on this book. Moreover, the last sentence of the introduction is really shocking. . . . The author's introduction is incompetent. This will turn off some readers.

I haven't seen it, but I have some questions Are Digimon and Pokémon comparable? Any Digimon can be a super evolution or a stronger super evolution. If it's more exaggerated, just evolve. Any attack can destroy the city. All you need to do is pick up a random one on the road and evolve it. Ah Pokémon? Apart from mythical beasts or super powerful quasi-gods, who can do it? How does this compare?

In fact, everything else is fine, but the simplest template attributes are all wrong. I saw that the Bleacher Goat in the early stage was grass-type and abandoned it. Does the Bleacher Goat-type Pokémon have a special characteristic of static electricity? Hahahahahahaha

How could this old guy be better than Mechanical Greymon?