A Guide to Raising Fox Spirits

In the contemporary trend, why do some people like to go online so much? If you think novels can distort your three views, it means you are not a good person to begin with. The author is writing stories and not educating you. Some people feel that they lack discipline. Do you read novels to educate yourself?

You really need to be prepared before reading this article. When I read the copy, I didn't expect it to be like this. The three views of feeling are really lovely, and they do all kinds of evil. And I don't know what kindness is, I don't know what it means to do something good for yourself, let alone what kindness is. Although the character design is like this, the copywriting said that the wild is difficult to train, which I really feel is a bit too novelistic. I don't know why articles like this are so popular. Isn't this misleading the contemporary trend?

I kept crying while reading this article. I don't know why but I feel so sad. I just feel that the little fox is very pitiful. I am more inclined to the view that people are inherently evil and need to be taught to be good. And this definition of good and evil is based on the human world. For the little fox, no one teaches him, and he brings his own evil. It is equivalent to being hated by the world as soon as he was born. How can a person who is disliked from birth learn to like all living beings? I have always said that the little fox is very greedy and wants all kinds of treasures. A person who has nothing will want to get a lot. He will eat everything he grabs every time and use everything he can use. I don't know if you have ever met that kind of stray cat that is often bullied after being hungry for a long time. If there is food, it will eat all the food, even if it is full to itself. Because it is afraid that it will be robbed if it does not eat, and it may not be able to eat the next meal. Children always have an innocent cruelty. They don't think they are murdering anything, they just think it's fun. The same goes for the little fox, because his destiny was to be judged as evil in the world when he was born. Punishing him when he was still ignorant of good and evil, because he did something that was evil in the world and who didn't know what was wrong with him, would encourage him to continue to do these things. The little fox has always wanted fairness, because his birth was unfair to him. He was a representative of evil and was hated by everyone. Some people may say this is whitewashing, but I think the little fox makes sense logically. In the animal world, the jungle has always been the law of the jungle. The little fox just doesn't understand the human world and follows the laws of the jungle.

If you want to have a righteous outlook on life, go to the People's Daily. It's full of positive energy. Is this novel promoting negative energy? In the novel, everyone except the little fox is slowly teaching him to be gentle to the world, and wiping his butt after he gets into trouble. But the little fox, as the evil in the world, the opposite of all things, is no longer unscrupulous for the sake of his lover, and can be said to have given up his own characteristics. Regarding nature and essence, Ma Yuan said that everything in the world has its own characteristics. The lost characteristics and essence are no longer the same thing. Hell gives up evil just like heaven gives up good. Isn't it a big sacrifice for him to change his nature and become another thing for his lover? Some people say that it will bring bad things to teenagers. Why would a teenager only learn his evil ways? They can also learn from the kindness of the white tiger and learn to accept the world for the sake of their lover. Believe me, teenagers have more dialectical thinking than you who view this novel one-sidedly.

It's very interesting, but I don't understand why novels have to be tied to reality. First of all, this book is originally about fantasy and has nothing to do with reality. Secondly, this is Shou's character. His experiences as a child made him destined to be unable to love the world. After all, he is not the Virgin. When he is hurt, he can still smile and say that you did a great job. You are such a good person. And reading novels is just for fun. If you really want to find out about the three views, there are too many things that are not correct in reality. As the saying goes, novels come from life. So it's not surprising that so many TV series with incorrect views can become popular, so novels are not surprising.

It's great. You didn't write it badly, you wrote it very well. I like this feeling. If it were made into a TV series, I would probably cry to death. Hahaha, I support it.

Seeing three monsters makes people upset. The author has repeatedly mentioned what kind of person he is in the copy. Some people want to read it like a sadist and then output a theory.

Let's talk about this article. First of all, the story line is twists and turns, which is good, but the important thing is that Shou's three views are not correct. The explanation given in the article is that one of the three souls and seven souls is missing, so he is like a child, but this is not the reason why he killed so many people and still lived a happy life in the end. The strangest thing is that everyone forgave him in the end. If this were true in real life, it would be absolutely impossible for others to forgive him without mentioning legal issues. The author should want to highlight Shou's heartthrob in this way, and Shou can be forgiven even if he makes huge mistakes, but this method will really lead to minors being misled, and those who read this kind of article are all minors.

Ahhhhh, I feel so sorry for Xiaorong, a little sad

What a lovely article! Let me follow the joy and disgust, joy and sorrow, love and hate of the little fox, and feel its unique charm. I also like Baihu very much, I like my brother, and I like the cute little Rongrong even more. Everyone is unforgettable and meaningful. I specifically clicked on the author's column to read the article, so how could I not like it!