Ludwig of 221B Baker Street

I reviewed articles I read many years ago. It feels like there are a lot of impressions that are reversed. At first, I tended to think that Le Shiwei was the fictional personality of the heroine. Apart from all the Sherlock Holmes reasoning that can be seen in the article, the author said in his words that he wears a Japanese watch like the heroine's father. This could be a symbol of her and his father's learning of inheritance. It is a kind of inheritance and sustenance. But there's still a problem. I had never been convinced that the heroine was a time traveler, but looking back, I noticed a lot more. I still don't know whether the heroine is a time traveler or not. Sherlock said that the heroine, like her father, would write a with a check mark, and the heroine also said that she and her little brother had a close relationship since childhood. She copied a copybook and said in Chapter 107 that when writing a paragraph, the tail of the letter "H" is long and drawn to the end. This is also the reason why the heroine recognized each other. The three of them have the same writing habits... In view of age and experience, I think it is the father-the heroine (adult words are difficult to influence by children). As for Duan and the heroine, regardless of time travel or not, according to the description and age, they should have learned to write at the same time. Unless the heroine first traveled from France to China (this is indeed possible. I believe that Li Weixi and Ludwig before he was seven years old are the same person. There is no contradictory description, this point does not need to be elaborated), and their English posts were specially bought by the heroine or were influenced by her ears. The heroine learned how to write... But can a seven-year-old French girl write English words? Temporarily giving up, the heroine talked about how she lived in isolation for a year and secretly learned French. Think maybe. But this situation is still a bit difficult. Another possibility is that parents teach words to their children together or are carefully designed to create such memories and situations. This is situation two. The first situation is that the heroine has indeed traveled through time. About the true identity of the heroine. There is a hint in the article. Eileen asked Sherlock if he knew who he was going to marry. In her description, the heroine plotted against herself. In view of Eileen's inquiries and hints, there must be a problem with the heroine's identity, but it is doubtful whether the heroine is a sacrifice of the Egyptian religion or some other higher and more critical identity. The former is a question that has been solved and is generally not reused, and Sherlock's silence makes me lean toward the latter. The heroine compared everything to being on a train that couldn't stop. She thought it was a dream, but when she woke up, she found that she couldn't stop. In other words, the current dream is the reality they live in. The article implies that the heroine is the conductor and controller of this train. There are two main situations that can be extended here. Situation A is that the heroine has traveled through time. She always thought that this was just a novel and made imaginary friends, but found out that it was true. In Situation B, the heroine did not travel through time. She manipulated herself, confusing her memory and making up dreams. She was both the manipulator and the passenger. When she recalled her memories, she found that she could not get rid of the influence of her imagination. But the article also said that wanting to leave the train was a sign of believing that he was not sick. Le Shiwei disappeared. I'm leaning towards A here. After recovering from the illness, I woke up from the dream when I realized that the dream was reality. Chapter 180 also says that she is back and a train cannot run without a conductor. Here again I am leaning towards scenario B. If it was B, why did she come to Xia? Is it just about solving a mystery? Have no idea. Is there any other way to combine situation AB to the conclusion? There should be, but I don't know how to combine it. It's a bit confusing. If time travel is true, I really can't think of a reasonable explanation for the handwriting. But the heroine's emotional memory also wants me to believe that she really traveled through time. The heroine's train conductor and her return, as well as her religious gesture to welcome the sun, made me feel that she has a lot to do with the church. No longer did monarchs need to rely on their poems praising the goddess. Does it imply that even if the heroine recovers her memory, she still chooses to be with Xiaoxia? In short, the hole dug by the author has not been filled, and I really want to catch him and ask him what is going on. However, looking at the time, I felt a headache again. There are still doubts about whether to cross or not. This question can also be attributed to whether childhood sweethearts really traveled through time. Too many threads tangled together. My IQ cannot provide a reasonable explanation for these problems and contradictions. I will never die with my eyes in peace. Can anyone please give me an answer. . .

I think that my sister was only 19 years old when she wrote this book... Really, I give you my knees... This writing style, knowledge reserve, and imagination are so amazing.

I don't know why there is so much difference between this 14-year-old fan and my image. I remember that I used to like to read it (I was a student at the time, and I'm making up for it now). The writing and image should be very good, but from today's perspective, the wording in the article is too old, and the reason is that too much of the Internet at that time was used. Popular sentences, which seemed interesting at the time, now seem to just want to be crossed out quickly, but I still like the part about Egypt. Of course, Sherlock sometimes seems a bit ancient and domineering in the article. Anyway, sometimes when I miss the old novels, I also miss myself.

Summary after reading (only personal thoughts): 1. Le should be a character imagined by the heroine. How those carpets were sent to 221B is currently unknown. 2. Yun He is not a figment of imagination, but the real heroine's neighbor brother who came to this world with the help of a necklace. 3. Based on 2, the heroine should be a time traveler, and later telling the hero that she is cured is a compromise, because it is actually impossible for the heroine to tell him that he is just a fictional character.

After reading it 10 years ago, this article is still so compelling. The excellent writing style and a small number of Internet memes make this article still not outdated at all. I can intuitively feel the author's understanding of Juan Fu and the shaping of the heroine, and I feel that Juan Fu is not OOC at all, which is really great! I'm glad that I didn't have money to read VIP articles ten years ago, otherwise I wouldn't be able to eat such fine chaff now [Star Eyes]

I like the last sentence: the law may not be noble, the government may not be reasonable, religion may be a lie, and morality may be just a tool.

Oh my god... My wife's writing skills are really awesome [prick-eared rabbit head] [pink heart] When will I be able to write such beautiful language. . I especially like to watch the daily life of Vichy and Curly Fu, and I like to watch some scenes of Sherlock's failure. To be honest, I felt a little confused at the end. Every detail of what happened between them seemed to be replayed in front of my eyes. I felt very unsatisfied. [I burst into tears] It took me less than a week to finish reading this article. It can be seen from many descriptions in the article that my wife has a wide range of knowledge, and her writing style ten years ago is no less good now. Although the ancient language and psychological descriptions in the early plot are a bit cumbersome, this article really becomes more and more exciting as I read it, broadening my new understanding of Shenxia fandom (are you reminding me that it's time to play Shenxia for the third time?) All in all, thank you Wei Xixi and Queen Xia for lighting up the few small beauties in my ordinary life, and thank you to my wife for writing such a touching article. The end is to spread the flowers [Spread flowers] [Spread flowers] [Spread flowers]

The second brush is finished! I decided to officially express my feelings here [burst into tears]. First of all, I want to express my love for this book frankly. . . It will always be the top one in my heart. I regret not knowing Teacher Chunfei earlier and encountering this book earlier, which resulted in the lack of a lot of interactions. This book is completely open and fast. The plot can be described as ups and downs. It was relatively immature and dull at first, but when you get to the middle, you realize something is wrong. There are too many foreshadowings! ? What about Le Shiwei's identity? Xiaoxia has made many observations about Vichy, ranging from suspicion to confirmation that she can play the piano, investigation of Le Shiwei's identity, confirmation of Vichy's illness, etc. Before talking about the wonderful plot, I would like to express my views on the shaping of the male and female protagonists and the emotions between them. Teacher Chunfei's portrayal of Sherlock is so powerful that there is no sense of disobedience. The teacher's profound knowledge is added to the consistent character, and he is the Sherlock Holmes who is only rational, awkward, willful, but the best at telling the truth. The heroine Ludwig is actually a girl who is very similar to Sherlock. She is bold, brilliant, and pursues a bumpy life. Sometimes she is a little childish. She is completely cute like a girl, but she is also very persistent and will not give up easily. I like every bit of her. In the early days, she seemed a little less decisive, but that was caused by her life experience. She has such a heartbreaking growth experience, but she can still live so chic and self-sufficient. I just want to say that she is a person worthy of my admiration. And the long-lasting emotions between the two characters I love really made me shed tears again and again. From Xiaoxia's initial declaration that he could restrain his emotions to the collapse of his mind after losing Vichy, this was his slow understanding of her, careful analysis, and caring for her in his own way. Even though many others thought he was inhumane and acted on his own initiative, everything he did to her was actually care expressed without words. His early and meticulous observation of Vichy. Maybe she was really just used as an experimental subject at first, but later it seemed that she was the only one in his eyes. He would never take the initiative to say what Sherlock did to Vichy. Maybe as he said himself, he only pursues results. But I think another thing is that he is not good at words. Similarly, Vichy is also a person who is not good at expressing emotions. Her love for Sherlock is all in her actions. A cup of coffee and two pieces of sugar. Even when she was sleepy, she helped him organize the newspaper. Two people who are not good at expressing themselves in words will always have conflicts when they are together, but as they get along day by day, they will gradually get along with each other. In fact, they always understand each other tacitly because they understand each other. I often see that Vichy understands Shylock's behavior but does not point it out and is very touched. I think that there is a person in the world who understands you so well, understands what you want to say but cannot say, understands the care behind your somewhat paranoid behavior. I am thinking that this is a very lucky thing. Sherlock didn't force Vichy, he just used his own way to get rid of the threats around her, with the desire to get stuck when he said it. It's not that Ludwig didn't love Sherlock, her love was exposed all the time, and she only had words to express it.

Many years ago, I secretly read the pirated text of this book on MP3 in school. I recently remembered it again and bought it in Jinjiang. It was still so good. This book was my enlightenment for sapiosexuality and the starting point for falling in love with Sherlock. At that time, the reasoning part behind it was very important to me. It's still a bit foggy, but the love part is really sweet. Now it seems that the logical thinking is very rigorous, and the author's words are also very cute. It reminds me of the previous Internet era, which was not so chaotic, but all the literature written now will probably be finished. In addition, I really like Miss Ludwig. Many of her characteristics coincide with mine. I also like some literary culture, as well as concepts such as not focusing on chastity, loving freedom, interpretation of marriage, etc. In the past, it was really innovative. Sometimes I even wonder whether her subconscious has influenced me, or whether I am attracted to her because of the way I am.

This is my favorite fanfic, I really like this style! Do you have any recommendations for similar novels? I want the author's book list!