I Can See the Cost of Every Choice

The writing is too stream-of-consciousness, or too pretentious, and the characters don't look like people.

The author is too obsessed with exaggeration, especially the various emotions, actions and costs of the protagonist. In the first book, nearly three-quarters of the content describes what happens to the protagonist and what happens to others, and the plot is slowly and ineffectively promoted. This is a text novel, not a movie or TV series. The information output and reception efficiency is not that high. Readers cannot focus on the desired pictures and filter out the useless parts like watching a movie. High-intensity output of content that has nothing to do with the story will only reduce the smoothness of the story. To be honest, after finishing this book, I have no energy to reason at all. I just watch the protagonist perform a one-man show intoxicatedly. From getting on the bus to perform to arriving at the station, the plot only advances two or three steps. When arriving at the station, the plot is pushed as fast as possible, and the performance is not forgotten even at the end. Please choose, continue to perform or tell stories.

To be honest, I didn't understand it all after reading it. The article was full of riddles, which made me confused.

I didn't understand what was written, it was so confusing and out of touch. Secondly, the protagonist is too holy. She only asks questions and keeps asking others, but does not give solutions herself. At any rate, Zheng Zha will still be brainless and fight for his life.

A newcomer to the horror game, relying on his ability to please the Holy Mother, he seems to be sure that he will not die.

I hope you all can share your thoughts with me. Thank you very much.

One is that the author's story is too confusing, and the other is that the protagonist is too unlikable. The author feels that he thinks clearly, but in fact, what the readers see is another story.

The first review of this book, The plot logic and reasoning are all very good, but the writing is too mysterious, too out of the ordinary, and has all kinds of strange descriptions. The first book is a rule: similar to the Prisoner's Dilemma The normal content, according to the author's logic, should be Observation (introducing characters, scenes, arranging hidden clues) Communication (dividing into factions) Problem solving (literally understanding the problem and being misled by the title) Breaking the problem (derivating the optimal solution and finding that there is no solution) Sect A failed in the first round of solving the problem (passing unanimously means there is no solution) (depressed) Mourning) AB battle of wits (theoretical solution = leading to the wrong answer) B faction failed in the second round of solving the problem (sacrifice grandma is the wrong answer) (the rabbit died and the fox was sad) Protagonist (incarnation of Mouri Kogoro - inner drama) Help the storm before it falls, help the building to collapse (start to show off) Broken the question (successfully pretended) Get off (aftertaste) (This is in line with the logic of reading online articles)

Every reader has a dream to write a book

How should I put it? It feels like the author of this book wanted to create a supernatural and weird atmosphere, but it felt like the fire was not enough. It felt like painting a tiger instead of a dog, and the supernatural atmosphere became like an AI. But I can't call it poisonous weed, it's just food and grass.

Classic routine plot, the protagonist of the classic is able to pass the level by exploiting the loopholes in the text Then the supporting characters are written as lumps, and the middle-aged manager in a suit is written as a middle-aged man. Can you tell me, what kind of variables are not in my model, I will go back and calculate it again rz is also a middle-aged man, it makes me uncomfortable The comment section also said that there is logic, but I can't see where the logic is. This book is purely the product of the author's self-indulgence

The introduction seems to be a bit grammatical, I didn't understand it

After reading the first copy, I just had an inexplicable feeling

The writing is too weak. After reading more than ten chapters, I retreated from some unexplained emotions and depths.

The setting idea is actually a bit gripping, you can see the cost behind the choice, and the moral dilemma background has some potential. But the reading experience is too fragmented. The connection between real-life communication, dialogue and consciousness lacks transition and organization. The text is too fragmented (very serious). The key information is in sparse sentences, which requires readers to piece it together by themselves. It makes me confused and confused. -The cost hedging deduced by the protagonist in the waste volume chapter can only be repeated to the conclusion pointed out at the beginning: choice must involve sacrifice, and sacrifice must be made. The strategy collapses, companions die, the situation remains unchanged or gradually deteriorates, and there is almost no actual gain beyond cognition. The whole process is verifying the themes that have been thrown out, and there is a lack of new starting points for outward expansion (the main reason is that the depth of the plot is not enough for outward expansion). The further the plot goes, the easier it is to fall into a cycle of internal friction. That's not to say that you can't write about unsolvable dilemmas, but the fragmented narrative and the depression of not being able to see a way out will make it very tiring to read.

The content of the story is good, but the author's writing style made it very uncomfortable for me to read.

This book is not suitable for listening to. After listening to it for a long time, you will feel foggy and want to vomit.

The plot is protracted, the character dialogue is too AI-heavy, and the overall feel feels like an AI short drama.

It's smelly, long, scratchy, and greasy. 😭😭

1. If the protagonist's ability is really the price of seeing options as the title of the book says, why did the old woman C disappear after choosing a? This is the opposite of the price logic seen on the bus later 2. The person who asked this question is so awesome that he has rewritten so many facts. However, the green plant comment in the circle of friends that does not match the picture and text is left to you. It was you who wrote the bug Is it better to leave a foreshadowing? 3 When you describe the price of the hero's ability, do you have to write so much nonsense like a primary school student's expansion essay? I don't see any special details. If it is just a messy setting like mental exhaustion leading to physical and mental discomfort, it will make it clear with a splitting headache. Then when you were writing about the price, you repeatedly mentioned the old lady's pickle jar and the writing on it, but I didn't understand it. You wanted to express that the male protagonist felt that his choice was related to human life and he had to be cautious, so you just wrote it directly. You wanted to express that the people who were erased, even the relevant people, would gradually forget about the trouble. You also said it directly, and don't let the male protagonist keep reading the pickle jar. It felt like you were high.

Full of sleep talk, as if talking to oneself, as if imagining in a dream

So is this book good to read?

The writing is okay, but the characters are a little weak.

His XX construction is a bit tired of aesthetics

It seems to be well written, but it's really hard to understand.

Is this a newcomer? Born to eat this bowl of rice?

It's so foggy that I can't even understand it when it's over.

The style is obviously different from the others, but I still wish it was a little softer.

It's okay, I can see the front, but I haven't seen the back yet

After reading the first few chapters, the plot is very good, with a bit of weirdness and a scary atmosphere, which is very attractive. The description feels a bit strange. The first one is that the protagonist's psychology is very strange, as if he doesn't care about everything and is in a bad mood. I can feel the psychological state that the author wants to describe, such as the protagonist's panic when Granny Zhao disappears, but I just can't relate to it. For example, the protagonist himself is not in this environment, he is like a bystander, and the reader is also a bystander, making it even more difficult for him to empathize. In addition, the author prefers to use short sentences and phrases to describe, probably because he wants to use a technique similar to line drawing. One disadvantage of this method is that the information density will be very high. In just one paragraph, the characteristics of various things are piled up. It is not organized and will be annoying and difficult to understand. In addition, the author doesn't write much dialogue, and only piles the information on the actions the protagonist sees, which makes it even more confusing. Overall, it's very good. At least the story is described in just a few chapters. I suggest the author focus on describing the characters. The protagonist's image is very uncomfortable. There are no memorable points and no sense of substitution.