Crime Investigation: I Can See the Evidence

Simple summary: Don't read it, it's poisonous In fact, I was so poisoned that I wanted to give up the book after reading less than 20 chapters. However, in order to make the evaluation more objective, I still endured and finished reading the first case. One (possibly more than one) small poisonous point in one chapter, and one (possibly more than one) major poisonous point in three chapters 1. Character: The protagonist likes to play tricks as a Riddler, flatter his bosses and colleagues, please criminal suspects, is also very flattering when asking the crowd for clues, does not take his parents' concerns seriously, has a stubborn temper, and has to be an auxiliary police officer in the forensic field. He thinks he's funny, but he's actually greasy. All the supporting characters are wise. Without the protagonist, the plot would not advance at all. There are also plots within the team such as insiders and pig teammates holding us back. 2. Time: The author has no concept of time at all. For a crime method that is highly closely related to time, it appears that the early police arguments were based on evidence that appeared later as support for the argument. Even the "alibi" of the two prisoners were established through "rigorous" police investigations. Don't you think it's funny? Moreover, the description of time in the context and context is often inconsistent, very imprecise, and not worthy of being a criminal investigation novel! 3. Modus operandi: The murderer's modus operandi is also full of flaws. There are many operations where he takes off his pants and farts. The author also feels that his writing is extremely subtle. There are many bugs in the plot logic 4. System: The system will also give irrelevant information to the protagonist as clues to interfere with the investigation, and the relevant clues will not be filled in. This system is a complete failure 5. Filling: After writing 40 chapters on a case, you will know how much water the author poured into it. The author claims to want to describe more about the atmosphere of life, but the more he writes, the more timid he becomes. 6. Logical bug: Finally, I want to ask the author a question about space. It is known that it takes 30 minutes to get from A to C, and 20 minutes to get from B to C. How many minutes does it take from A to B? The answer is greater than or equal to 10 minutes! Only when B is on the only way from A to C will it be the shortest 10 minutes. It's a simple math problem, the sum of two sides of a triangle is greater than the third side. In this case, "the time for prisoner A to go from A to C" must be shorter than the sum of the time for "prisoner A to go from A to B first, and then for prisoner B to go from B to C." Then why not let A directly go to C to kill someone, and B go to A to prove his alibi instead of A? So, the more complex the modus operandi, the more flaws there will be. I'm really exhausted.

I can't bear to see this nonsense of overt and covert fighting.

Were college students working as auxiliary police officers so luxurious in those days? Funny

It was okay, but the case design was a bit buggy - Li Guifen, Sun Ya, and Su Hao were almost at the same time, which meant that Sun Ya probably took less than half an hour to commit the crime and clean up. Li Guifen said that the room was messy, and anyone who has done housework knows that it is difficult →_→ Sun Ya was born with supernatural powers, but she was not a professional cleaner. There are still two points that have not been followed up: 1. Cleaning traces. What cleaning agents and tools should be used? Are they always available at the deceased's home? 2 No forensic scene reconstruction

After reading the first case, let's leave it at that... The system is dispensable and it shows its effect. Secondly, after the case is investigated, the woman's natural supernatural power comes out 😅

As for the first case, the various evidence chains are too far-fetched. It's just a story just for the sake of evidence.

It's too tedious and the case string is too long. .

It's quite nonsense. The supporting character is a bit demoted. He has anti-investigation awareness and can be deceived by a simple trick. Where does this anti-investigation awareness come from?

It makes me feel like watching an AI short drama

The protagonist's workplace is unclear. One is the Dong'an Branch of Dong'an County, and the other is the Dong'an County Public Security Bureau Branch. Both of these titles are not in compliance with the Regulations on the Organization and Management of Public Security Organs. The first type of title is generally called the XX District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city (referred to as the District Public Security Bureau). This is not only the dispatched agency of the Municipal Public Security Bureau, but also a component department of the district government. The subordinate law enforcement agency is usually a brigade. The second type is generally called the Public Security Bureau of a certain county, which is just a component department of the county government.