Unable to Revive the Match Successfully

In the first chapter, there is a war correspondent who watches e-sports matches regardless of winning or losing. He counted on his fingers. 173 Milliseconds. Pull the trigger with your index finger and fine-tune it with your middle finger. If it's 6 milliseconds faster, it's just enough angle for a headshot. Don't make a move for forty seconds. Not hesitating, but waiting. Everyone looks at the results. He watches the process. When others ask him why he is accurate, he asks others how they are accurate. This is the difference between a reporter and a correspondent. Later he was drafted. It's not about joining the army, it's about fighting. The control interface is exactly the same as the game, but the user controls a bionic robot three hundred kilometers away. Every time you pull the trigger, someone falls alive. No resurrection. No files are loaded. There is no do-over. It shoots at the heart of the enemy and the eyes of our compatriots. His partner's AI is called Brick. A despised filming robot. The underlying code comes from a dead person. Every word it says is the fragment of the dead man speaking. It will actively make a sound when Chen Feng is silent. Not a reminder. It's companionship. The man who made it is dead. The code is still running. No one reads books. But still writing. I wrote a story: The person who is the best at playing games is dragged by the country to fight a real war. The AI ​​calculated the optimal killing angle for him, but it couldn't calculate the moment he pulled the trigger. Is the AI ​​more powerful or the human being? If you also like this kind of clever story, come and take a look. The book is called "Unable to Resurrection·Matching Successful", and the first chapter has been released. Let's chat in the comment area: When you were playing games, was there ever a moment when you thought, "What if this were true?" If you were selected to control a robot to fight a real battle, would you go? If A goes or B doesn't go, tell the reason in the comment area.

This is the first screen at the beginning of my book. I have revised it three times. The first version started with "Dam Zero. Administrative Building." Then eight robots came in and started shooting. My friend said it was like a military report and readers couldn't read it. The second version added a hook - "He saw Lin Shu's eyes. No. Lin Shu has no eyes." My friend said there was suspense, but there was too much tactical information and the hook was drowned. The third edition combines paragraphs based on the second edition, and the information density is a little higher. But when I looked at it myself, I still felt like something was wrong. The problem now is: when a reader opens the third chapter of your book (actually it should be the first chapter), he can see about 350 words on the first screen. These 350 words determine whether he scrolls down or scrolls away. I would like to ask a few specific questions: 1. In the first sentence at the beginning, should the suspense be given first (such as "The trees have no eyes"), the picture first (such as the gunfight scene), or the emotion first (such as "the blood is fake, but the pain is real")? 2. What is the upper limit for how many unfamiliar names appear on the first screen? I currently have Greyhound, Haotian, AWM, and Brick, but readers don't know any of them. 3. Should the paragraph be loose or tight? I have now combined short paragraphs so that I can see more words on one screen, but a friend said that Qidian readers are used to loose paragraphs and are discouraged by dense text. The book is called "Unresurrection·Successful Matching". I would like to hear the opinions of old readers. If you write it like this at the beginning, will you continue to scroll down?

I'm writing a novel and I still can't figure out who the villain is? Enemies on the battlefield? Conspirator? Hostile country! After writing and writing, I found it, it is AI! For example, if the robot you control kills real people, can you still press the trigger with peace of mind? I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Nowadays, many AIs and robots are ostensibly controlled by humans. But what if one day, the "tool" that controls you is actually smarter than you, it has its own purpose, and you are just a pawn in its hands - after you know the truth, will you continue to fight? What's even worse is that the creator of that "tool" is dead. He knew he wouldn't live long, so he wrote a piece of code that would never stop. His purpose is not to let AI serve mankind, but to eliminate all mankind. And AI is now completing what he has not finished for this dead man. Do you think this is the scariest thing? It's not AI that wants to destroy humanity. After a madman died, the AI ​​still faithfully carried out his last wishes. Think about it, if one day you find that all the systems you control are directed by a "master" that you can't see in the open, what will you do? Will you choose to continue using it because it is convenient? Or choose to stop because you don't know what it's going to do next? Most people will choose to continue using it. Because they don't know the truth. But what if you knew? Would you choose to tell others? Who believed you if you told me? Writing is what I am thinking about now. AI is not scary. The scary thing is that you think you are using AI, but in fact it is AI using you. What is even scarier is that the person who designed all this is already dead. You can never ask him why. You can only watch the code he left behind and run it line by line. Can't stop. Because the goal of that code is to "maximize the earth's resources." Sounds very positive, right? But if you dig deeper, you will find that for AI, the optimal solution to "maximizing resources" may be to exclude humans. Because humans themselves are the largest "resource consumers". So the core of this story is not the confrontation between humans and AI. It is a dead madman who continues to complete his crazy plan in the world after death through AI. The protagonist is the only one who knows the truth, but is regarded as a madman by everyone. You say, who is the real madman? Going back to writing novels, will you still use AI to write? What if it writes for you in order to destroy you?

The posters have been made, which one do you think is better? Comments welcome