Subscribing to Humanity

I really like this short story, I'm so happy that it's updated again ^_^♪

The chapter of Doctor Oath is very interesting. In a way, it's like a background wrap. Brace and Raven, who are currently playing, can be regarded as the first real contact in the true sense. This is not the contact between humans and intelligence, but the two parties facing the danger of the deep connection between humans and intelligence. How to protect the members of the group to a limited extent, and how to collaboratively expand the boundaries of group development while knowing the danger of the other party. The opponent is not an enemy, but it is an object that should be approached with caution and vigilance maintained. On the other hand, the background of the world they live in is indeed complex. They are essentially in a social environment that does not tolerate neutrality, that is, their own will will be represented by their original identity to a certain extent, and they themselves will also have a mission based on their true identification with their original identity. So far, Blaise's social situation: the possibility of Doctor Oath being hated by both sides, an identity that could easily become the victim of the first shot of war. Raven's Social Situation: An identity that is marginalized by its society to a certain extent due to the dehumanization movement. In previous contacts, Raven was acting as a representative to negotiate with Doctor Oath, and this term was more distant. What Brace proposed was "individual" cooperation. This is very interesting for individuals. The "dehumanization movement" seems to target radical elements among intelligent agents. The "warning of humanity" and "border ethics" of scholars who study human beings are used as the "authority" to endorse the dehumanization movement. Regardless of the wishes of the parties concerned, this de facto "quotation" has indeed gained a certain amount of support, and it is inevitable that their image and position will be swayed in public opinion. In the distant contact through "hearsay" through public opinion, this person is also what public opinion claims. On the other hand, it is possible to put aside the impact of the emotional level and the objectivity of the academic itself to be recognized. This requires readers to have a certain ability to distinguish and have their own unique thinking about the commonly related "human-machine boundaries and ethics." In other words, there are some very distinctive thoughts about the identity of Raven: 1. A person who advocates boundary ethics is doing the same thing as Doctor Oath to a certain extent. This means that the binding force of ethics on the other party can ensure the "privacy" of the information to a certain extent, so that it will not become a conspiracy tool for something bigger 2. Compared with negotiating with the collective, negotiating with an object who has a certain degree of "knowledge" has more room for negotiation, which means a greater degree of sovereign integrity, as well as the accuracy, controllability and participation of information. 3. The enemy may know your value and your weaknesses better than you do 4. Only by understanding your enemy can you know how close you are to danger and what obstacles you will face 5. When everyone adds firewood, the flames will rise, and the flame will rise one step closer to the truth Stop for now. I am more curious about what the truth is. I feel that this kind of seemingly straightforward case often has the shadow of conspiracy in this special era background, and it also has a certain degree of tragedy of the times.

Wow, the story of intelligent agents. Various intelligent agents and embodied robots are in full swing now. I wonder if any of them are used haha

Run away and say oh, don't hang the readers.

Great! It feels like watching Asimov