Showbiz 1978: New York, New York

Apocalypse is a very disgusting thing. That is to say, the Chicago author has to be good at writing. If he imitates him, there is a high chance that he will fall into the street.

It's a low-profile version that exploits Hollywood kids. The setting is so good that you know you've traveled through time but have no memory of your past life. Even Jodie Foster can't recognize it. The creation also relies on Apocalypse's pure masochistic loser protagonist.

An unexpected bonus, well written! But I feel that the main character is too conservatively written and still looks like a good Chinese baby! If the protagonist has the wrong taste, it will be useless no matter how good the other aspects are.

Author, I really want to know, in your eyes, is Jodie Foster really good-looking? More than once in the book, the protagonist is shocked by her. Frankly speaking, her appearance is really average. Dude, you can talk about her acting skills and other aspects in the later stage. The key point is that her appearance is only slightly better in The Silence of the Lambs. Her square face has sharp edges and corners, which Americans at the time might have liked. Do you think the protagonist would like it? And even if Americans like him, he is not famous for his beauty in the United States, right? 😅😅😅

How much price did Hollywood actresses pay to get Zeke at his peak? 8. In the 1990s, Hollywood actresses were really beautiful and beautiful, and a hundred flowers bloomed.

Why write so much about politics? . . Your book on the entertainment industry contains so much politics and a political atmosphere, and you are not running for election. No one requires you to directly take sides, or it is okay to take sides but there is no need to rush to attack the opponent.

The more I write, the more boring it becomes. It's all about popularizing science about so and so and so and so. Who reads novels just to learn about science for you?

I haven't read this book yet. It was recommended by someone there in 1990. If you don't like this book, I can't tell you if you haven't read it yet. A lot of people don't like "Apocalypse Plug-in"? ? ? I don't know how old you are, but I am 29 this year. I have been reading online articles for decades, and I have reached the extreme level of aesthetic fatigue with articles about gods, unrestricted rebirth/text copying, and trivial articles. Especially after watching 1990, I can hardly read other texts without any restrictions. That kind of thing is fun in the short term, but don't you think it's fake? ? I often take out dozens of historical songs at once, and write a movie script in a few days... I'm not a buddy, are you 15 years old? ? Apocalypse is a god-like setting for me. The uncertainty, the sense of expectation for the future, the restraint of external G, and the "song guessing session" every time I go to a new scene, are unprecedented. A lot of people are complaining about the setting of Apocalypse... Is it true that 1990 will be so popular when you say it is so bad? ? The people talking in the comment area are all underage, right... Once again, I feel that people on the Internet are mixed. Under normal circumstances, you will never interact with these people in your life. You may not be old enough to read Tianqiwen...

Is it to get people to attack? The previous popular book was about attacking black people. Is this one meant to be misunderstood as an attack on gays? I feel like this weird contradiction is always intentionally created. I originally read the previous article quite well, but I don't know why people must quickly realize that it is gay, or even plagiarize it, mistakenly thinking that they have been to a gay bar. What's the point?

I'm really speechless. No wonder the grades are so poor. Forced wisdom, this is it.