Hollywood 1952

1952 Is too far away

Gangsters and chaebols really controlled the entertainment industry in that era of underdeveloped information. The famous representative is Sinatra, the Hollywood spokesperson of the Mafia. If the protagonist doesn't have these two backgrounds, I'm afraid it will be difficult for him to move forward.

I should say it or not, although the content is not good, the author's attitude is really good. A lot of people are scolding the author for sending a girl to a turtle boy, but the author is apologizing and won't talk back. I think there is no need to upgrade to the author if you want to read the book. If you don't want to read it, you don't have to read it. What's the point of catching the author and scolding him?

Single heroine, what a pity

When you become a foreigner through time travel, don't always mention liquor and peanuts. Just mention it once. More than 20% of foreigners are allergic to peanuts. Don't poison pig's feet and their friends to death. There is also liquor, most of us Chinese don't like it. In the past, we were too poor to drink and had no choice (white wine is made from sweet potatoes, corns, sorghum and other miscellaneous grains and does not occupy the staple food. After liberation, the country promoted white wine to save grain). It tasted terrible. Can a foreigner with pig's feet tolerate Chinese food in his stomach? It would be difficult for a southerner to eat northern food or a northerner to eat southern food, let alone a foreigner.

What does the protagonist want to do? If there are multiple female protagonists, don't waste time. If you want to start a business, don't work hard. If you want to start a business, just make a few moves. What exactly do you want to do and what is the main line?

1. First of all, this book has many shortcomings. The main character's intention is unclear, just like the story has no main line, and it goes from east to west. 2. Since you are developing in Hollywood, why not go to college? I started working after I graduated from high school, and then I stopped working. At first, I thought it was a summer internship, so why did you write that you had to complete your high school credits in advance? What's the point? 3. Once you open the store, you will leave it alone. Are you a commercial writer or a director and producer in the entertainment industry? He is just a fan doing rough work in the entertainment industry.

Writing about entertainment, it has a single female protagonist, and it's the era of Marilyn Monroe, so it will cut off more than half of the readers. 🤫🤫🤫

How can I put it, the author is indeed unique in writing novels of this era, but it has to have a single heroine. Many people say that the author does not understand, and some even encourage the author to write well (I feel that other authors are trying to kill him). After interacting with the author, he suggested that he write a swaggering novel. The first one is Marilyn Monroe, and the second one is Jane Fonda. He wants to be all Jane Fonda. How can I put it, for example, why are so many time travel entertainment novels like this? There are many female protagonists (for example, in Hong Kong, Brigitte Lin, Russula, Chiu Yazhi, Guan Zhilin, Qiu Shuzhen, Zhang Min), these are basically the memories of a generation and the fantasies of many men. The author now writing a single female protagonist is equivalent to liking Li Zhi and then giving her good movies for future generations. He even gave her movies by Brigitte for fear of promoting her as a martial arts goddess. Without Brigitte Lin, there is nothing else in the timeline written by the author. The thing about Hong Kong goddesses is that they all have to serve as foils for Li Zhi, which means that the fantasies of us readers no longer exist, and the readers who read it are disgusting. The author said that he does not understand why readers want more female protagonists, because we can accept that the male protagonist has more female protagonists, even if he is such a scumbag, it is better to love one of them than those Hong Kong female stars who are played by others and are not rich. This is the unique possessiveness in China (not virginity) I have never understood those who have to be virgins. My real-life wife probably doesn't even know how to do it.) To give another analogy, for example, the author gave the role of Liu Yifei to Huang Yi in The Legend of the Condor Heroes, and praised her as a little fairy of a generation. It is very disgusting (although I don't know why so many people like to lick Liu Yifei, but I understand that they are all men, and I also lick Marilyn Monroe). Now the protagonist praises Jane Fonda and makes future generations so... There are many classic movies for her, and there may be more songs in the future. In this way, it will not be the era of Marilyn Monroe but the era of Jane Fonda. Jane Fonda is the symbol of America. I may think it is inappropriate when I think about it. Basically, I like to write about the male protagonist Hepburn. However, people always write about the female protagonist. I don't understand what is good about Hepburn and Harry Potter. Emma is the most beautiful. (And most of the female protagonists are very pretty. The biggest advantage is that those female stars will basically not deviate from their original trajectory. If they make movies or songs given to them by male protagonists, they will become more popular than before. Jane Fonda, not Jane Fonda, became the standout star of that era. Maybe the author said that other female stars will be filmed later, but after all, I am not my own woman. I may be malicious and think that I will only give a few movies that are not popular or made by her in the original time and space, and will not make the popular movies of later generations For those actresses, I guess they all went to Jane Fonda. For example, the airy and airy heroines are all based on the image of Marilyn Monroe. The author should check it out himself. If Jane Fonda said that Marilyn Monroe had a bad temper, go and check her baseball ex-husband. No one said that Monroe had a bad temper in his later years, only those directors who wanted to play her.) Having said that, I still encourage the author to continue writing according to his own ideas. Now base. I mostly write novels from the 1990s. Ever since I read Hollywood Melon Man, I can't read other people's novels from the 1990s. The author's writing is still very good. The author's track has not been copied by other authors. Come on. I will read it later. I saw that the title you wrote was for future generations. 😎😎😎😎

I ordered a chapter just to say, if the author is writing an entertainment article, please indicate that it is a single heroine because in my opinion, you are clearly here to deceive people.

After watching the video of Prisoner A, I found out that Monroe must have been disassembled and lost after her death. One clip I could find is that Kim Kardashian took out a section of Monroe's hair in her own video, and said with an adoring and "obsessed" face that she loved Monroe so much. So where did this hair come from? By extension, Monroe's body must have been dismantled after her death and used for various purposes, such as being sold, sold, collected, etc. It's terrible and very pitiful

It's not realistic at all to have a single female protagonist.

The author does not need to forget the milk tea shop brand and the milk tea knowledge patent 😜

How about using movie plots to trick people into subscribing?

It would be good to portray boys as a fresh force in Hollywood, but the roughness and laziness of the male protagonist are not suitable for writing multiple female protagonists. If you want to write, at most it will be about who slept today and who will be lying in bed tomorrow. This is just one more way to slow down the rhythm. My personal dissatisfaction is that there are too few descriptions of daily life. There were a lot of things to write about in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s, including lifestyles, vehicle structures, and even services on airplanes, because these were far removed from the daily experience of most readers. Unfortunately, the author's description focuses on the male protagonist's work and the plots of various old movies. We are already busy enough in reality, but reading a novel requires us to be a workaholic, and we cannot relax at all...

There are too many novels with multiple female protagonists, and I'm tired of them all.

Having a single heroine in entertainment is like eating a seafood buffet and only eating carbs for twenty minutes to be full. It's puzzling.

That's it!

The author should read more of the same genre and learn more. There is obviously a lack of grasp of the cool points. Taking the film release as an example, what should be more concerned about is not the content of the film, but the reaction, the audience's reaction, the reaction of the film company and even the comments of other countries. Take the release of 007 as an example. It ended too quickly. I could have written a few more chapters, about the reaction of the British people, their amazement at the innovation of fighting technology, or the film company's plan to follow suit, etc. 007 is a very successful series of movies. It is a breakthrough movie. It should be described more deeply instead of briefly mentioned. After all, the 1960s is too long ago. It is rare to have a familiar movie. It is a pity not to grasp it well.

It's been a long time since I've seen an author write about Golden Age Hollywood. Why doesn't anyone write about it?

Considering the protagonist's era, there were not many movies, and special effects limited many masterpieces. They could only develop in action, love, horror, animation, song and dance, and novels. Science fiction can also be made, but the money will probably cost more than Gone with the Wind. (Movies with Marilyn Monroe, Jane Fonda Eastwood, or some beauties of that era that will appear later) (Needless to say, Zorro, a classic IP Eastwood) You can make it, you can make many movies. If the protagonist of Jaws has the skills, you can give him the skills. After all, it is very suitable for a tough guy. He has made several movies like Longwei Boy and incorporated some popular actions in later generations. The action scenes of Batman that Nolan was criticized for were groundbreaking and sensational when he got the leading role. Directors at that time could not think of it. Rocky can also give him, Million Dollar Arm, Dragon Fighter, Raiders of the Lost Ark)

European and American women age too fast. I couldn't even look at Rose of Highgarden's face two days ago. Brooke Shields has now turned into an old witch. Sean Connery's face has also become square. Charlize Theron has persisted for a little longer but can't get a close look. Her skin is too bad.

It's written that Hollywood is still a single heroine, so she takes off her pants and farts, and she looks cool and stands up at the same time, hey~

The author writes this kind of chronicle, and the writing needs to be more brilliant... After all, it is difficult to reap the dividends of the times... (It is easier to get full if you are rigorous in textual research + conform to the route of becoming capital with the times) ① Search the Hollywood Golden Age in a narrow sense to refer to 1930~1949 (in a broad sense, it means the birth of sound movies in 1927~ 1960) [But this golden age is for studios: ① The five major studios (MGM, Paramount, Warner, Fox, RKO) have a vertical monopoly, owning production, distribution, and theaters; actors are forced to sign long-term contracts with studios, and the five major studios monopolized the power of agents in the golden age. (The rise of the independent agency industry happened after the Paramount decision in 1948)] ②Global Generation X ~ Generation Z (1965-2009) They are all more familiar with movies after 1980 (youth memory anchor) Many of those who use the "golden age" in the narrow sense as the anchor of youth memory have passed away... Even in the broad sense of the golden age... Those who regard it as the anchor of youth memory... They are also very old (it is difficult to contribute to literary and artistic works) ③ So the author does not have to doubt whether it is A single female protagonist... Or some other problem, resulting in not many people watching it (actually at this time... Most people in the world... Know about the movies at that time through short video clips... Unless hard-core movie fans... Especially those who want to develop into Hollywood...) The so-called "golden age" is rarely written about... Because it is the "golden age" of management... The author can enjoy very few era dividends (if the author writes about pig feet being an actor from the silent film era If you step by step and become a capital tycoon, you can still reap the full dividends of the era) ④ To be able to write out the characteristics of this era (era literature... Let readers who are not familiar with that era also have a sense of substitution), then the author must have two brushes...(Must have a high level of textual research skills) And textual research is the foundation... Atmospheric translation is the threshold, avoiding the accumulation of historical materials... Solving the problem that readers have no original impression and have difficulty in figuring out the environment and thinking logic on their own The same problem was written in 1980, especially after 1990 It is the anchor point of youth memory for most of the surviving audiences... You can figure it out for yourself...) PS: If I remember correctly, there was a book "Long Live the Director" that wrote about the era of silent films → talkies → golden production → the end of World War II The author combined many major historical events with pig's trotter movies and magically modified them (although it was very It's so sensational... It's so embarrassing to buckle jio) This book is not rigorously research-oriented, and it does not delve into the texture of the times... But simply and crudely applies modern people's thinking to the old era throughout the book But 17 to 18 years ago, let alone short videos... The mobile Internet era has not yet arrived (This kind of era literature... At that time, the author used the logic of modern thinking and applied it to the 1920s. Readers would not find it too inconsistent, because at that time: the information explosion had not yet sunk... The public had not yet been bombarded with cognition... The short video era had raised the threshold of public research... After all, all kinds of messy information... Mostly obtained from short video slices... Is there a sense of Hollywood in the golden age? It is completely different in which era to write... If it was before the mobile Internet era, the author would be much more relaxed)

. . . Is there a possibility that the six major universities are still not very good at this time? In the 1970s, conglomerates only entered Hollywood. You can do it yourself, distribution and so on.

The selection of material for this novel is very good. There are so few novels from the Golden Age of Hollywood that almost no one is willing to write them, but the heroine chosen is not suitable!

Not to mention the situation in Hollywood where there are single female protagonists.

Starting in 1952, the track was different from other races in the 1990s. As long as you write well, you will have your own readers

This is the first time I've seen a producer instead of a director, and I don't like it.

Chapter 300 is full of movie-related plots. I stayed up late to watch it and had a lot of fun. I think it can be used as an expanded movie list. There are too many irrelevant plots after Ben-Hur. Now I just jump to watch them, but sometimes I am not happy to watch the politics behind the previous movies. So I would like to ask how much of the plot behind it is the movie? I'd like to consider whether to continue subscribing