My Physics Masters Couldn’t Possibly Be Archmages

I remember that when I first saw pseudo-historical theory, it was still a dispute between Aristotle and the ancient Egyptian civilization. The history at that time was far away and there was a lack of records, so it was normal to have disputes. I didn't expect that it would now spread to modern history. Haven't you ever thought that people from that era might still be alive now? 😥 Yang Zhenning, who worked with Einstein, died last year. In the eyes of many people, it is estimated that the world has been simplified into two options, "China", and a "foreign country" covering an area of ​​124.5 Million square kilometers and a population of 6.875 Billion. Einstein is a German, Tesla is a Serbian, and the dreamer Mendeleev is a Russian. This is not Western history, but world history. The most stringent review system in history and physics is peer review around the world. Einstein even experienced the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, but even these two mortal enemies still recognized the theory of relativity. If they can fool everyone—including their sworn enemies—then that in itself is greater than true science. " When people are prosperous, they always want to hide their unbearable past. Simplifying the history of science and civilization into a struggle between ourselves and the enemy to compensate for self-esteem seems to be an inevitable tendency after the rise of nationalism. I have actually seen this tendency in Vietnam and South Korea. For example, South Korea They claim that this is theirs and that it is theirs. They say that they are the country that has lost the most territory in history, and even think that the Northeast once belonged to them. There is also Vietnam. When asked whether the history they invented has a textual basis, the most common answer is: "Our historical texts were burned down in the thousand years of your rule." ". Nationalist sentiment in Vietnam and South Korea has risen to the government level, and is even reflected in textbooks to a certain extent. But we are lucky that at least our real elites are awake. The reason why Chinese civilization has been able to stand for five thousand years is precisely because we respect history and record history, including all the sufferings we have suffered. The Five Husbands Rebellion, the Jingkang Disgrace, the Battle of Yashan, the Ten Days at Yangzhou... And the "Modern History of China" that required two full volumes of study in just over a hundred years Why did we carve those shames on the bones of the nation in a way that almost humiliated ourselves? Isn't it just to remember who we are, what kind of suffering we have come out of, and remember that we can never return to that position of being dominated by others! A person will not truly grow if he deliberately forgets the detours he has taken and the beatings he has suffered; if a nation chooses to forget, even Beautifying our past will only lead to decline. What about us? Are we Vietnam or South Korea? Does China also need to whitewash its history to get that cheap and sad self-esteem? Self-esteem has never been based on inventing history? What we gain from history is gained by creating the future. As a person of a big country, you should have the tolerance of a big country - only by respecting history and facts can you see the future clearly and go a long way. People have ups and downs, let alone civilization, and there is no rush to be first. , The contention is endless.

Times have changed. Now is the era of Yongle Dadian and pseudo-historical theory. The era of relying on dreams and smashing apples is gone forever.

Sure enough, it is difficult to describe the higher level of wisdom. With hydrogen storage technology, the author uses it to make grenades, and with room-temperature superconductors, he uses it to make electromagnetic guns. They are all overkill. I can't describe the wisdom of the big guys. I can't imagine Einstein and Tesla spending a lot of time and using advanced technology to make guns. Applying these technologies to other aspects is much more useful than grenades. Because the author cannot imagine advanced weapons and does not realize that these are advanced technologies. The author cannot write about the technology of the future world, the wisdom of the boss, or the magic system. The starting point is too high and the level is too low.

There are always some inexplicable metaphors when using AI to refine, which is annoying to watch.

It's bad. The author's book club is full of pseudo-historical theories. Not mentioning ancient history, they have begun to deny modern and modern history, especially celebrities in physics, a subject with a strong rigor. They used to criticize South Korea for stealing honors, but now they are really enjoying their culture and have begun to imitate South Korea and steal honors for themselves. 😒😒😒

The protagonist's ultimate goal is to save the doomed future world. The future world has ended, proving that technology has failed, so now we go to the magic world to find a magic system. These scientific experts go to the magical world not to help the protagonist develop slowly, but to study the nature of magic so that they can fight against enemies in the future world. If magic is a combination of great power, then these big guys can break through and become gods themselves, and the protagonist can be brought to the future. If magic can affect ordinary people, then the big guys can just study the principles of magic. Until now, even ether, the source of magic, and spiritual power have not been studied. Just try to use technology to improve magic every day, but it's useless. Technology has proven to be a failure. Can we rely on these technological magic to save the future? Now using technology to improve magic and help the slow protagonist develop, what is the point of letting the protagonist become a magic god to save the future? The protagonist can take people to the future, but the protagonist does not have to save them. Are the bosses not hundreds of times more qualified than the protagonist? Becoming a magic god takes a short time and the possibility is high for the big guys. Isn't it better for the boss to break through and study the magic system clearly than to be the protagonist's grandfather? Now it's a nanny story where the boss gives up on research, gives up on saving the future, and revolves around the protagonist every day.

It's too lofty, the writing is too spacey, and it's also modified with AI, which makes it even more empty and unsystematic.

Good guys, the pseudo-historians have all come out (now calling themselves Western History Discriminators). These people's IQs are really worrying, just like those in Korea who are Korean in everything. Moreover, the source of the pseudo-historical theory was created by a person in Russia. The version he created included ours, such as the Great Wall, but when it was moved to China, domestically related things were removed. In addition, even if Western history is falsified, the concept of the West actually refers to the whole world outside of us. Egypt, Persia, etc. Are all considered the West, which is really difficult to collapse.

Regarding Yongle Dadian, if Western technologies are plagiarized from China, why did the West rise but China did not? Why did the Chinese fail to develop results? Whose fault is this? If you say it was the fault of the Qing Dynasty, it raises another problem. It was not a dynasty of the Han people. You can say it was completely incompetent. But as for the Ming Dynasty, it was a full 200 years after Yongle was written that the Qing Dynasty became the Qing Dynasty. Isn't it ridiculous to admit that this theory can only prove that the Chinese people are incompetent, sitting on their hands, and having their own things carried forward by others? Is it shameful? Regardless of whether it is forward or backward, this kind of pseudo-historical theory is illogical.

Probably not, because the book is essentially a group portrait. It tells the story of a group of scientists who research and explore magic and then save the world. The main role of the protagonist in the book is a bridge, linking the scientists together. In a sense, there are many protagonists. It is impossible to leave some words to write about the love between children, as that would be a deviation from the theme.