Rekindling 1983: Making a Living in the Mountains

The two or three books on the bestseller list are all period dramas depicting ordinary, uneventful life, without so much melodrama and resentment. Strangely, no one seems to follow the style of those two books. Instead, almost all authors, defying convention, are like moths to a flame, writing these repentant period dramas. Shouldn't they be studying high-achieving books? These repentant period dramas haven't even appeared on the bestseller list.

Not all novel readers enjoy "feel-good" stories, but nobody likes watching the protagonist constantly suffer and be schemed against. The conspiracies and plots against the protagonist are endless; one person schemes against them, then another comes along. It's just too stupid.

You could actually check out the book "1985 Beginning, Snow Seals the Door," which I found to have a somewhat weak sense of everyday life. Logically, a book with a weaker sense of everyday life should have a faster pace, but this one is actually quite slow. However, it's still a decent first book for a beginner.

1. So many repeated words appear too frequently (a warm feeling in my heart) (a loving pat on the head) (this child is kind and righteous) (the sister-in-law's voice, muffled by a gagging sound) 2. Everyone seems to want the protagonist dead, so there will inevitably be one or more people secretly plotting and scheming to disgust the protagonist, and he always manages to see through their schemes.

Why do you like writing about ambiguous things so much, being innocent yet lacking boundaries? You procrastinate on everything, and when you encounter a jerk who provokes you, you pretend to be profound, only to get tricked every time and then have to deal with it piece by piece? And you call yourself a Northeasterner?! What's wrong with slapping a jerk who provokes you?

This book is well-written; the protagonist's character is well-developed. He wasn't a useless person in his previous life. Some authors, I don't know what they're thinking, writing about useless or foolish people being reborn—useless people are still useless even after being reborn. This book, along with "1983: A Small Fishing Village," can be considered one of the few rebirth-themed period novels that are worth reading.

The author should take note: people are tired of your ridiculous and absurd writing. Those who come to read your book are probably just looking for something juicy and entertaining. You could adjust your approach; your grades should improve.

I couldn't stand it anymore, so I watched something with a sense of nostalgia, focusing on the lives of the older generation. Why is everyone so pretentious? And this family drama is just too much!

The Northeast is vast and sparsely populated, but you've written it like it's reduced to the size of a courtyard. Everything you do is being watched from the shadows, and not just for fun, but for ulterior motives. In the villages, people eavesdrop; in the towns, there are people secretly observing; and even in the county, there's another pair of eyes watching.

Without adding a few more enemies, will the story be unable to progress? Reading is for relaxation; we can tolerate filler content, but this is just adding to the reader's frustration. What, author, do you have a grudge against your readers?