Krishna’s Bizarre Adventure

Is this how Nima deceives readers who support you? ? ? The book Shan Hai was cut off after just over a hundred chapters? How can you still let us trust you? , I know you from the book "Emperor of Heaven", let's not talk about the book about reversing the curse. The problem is that the book "Shan Hai" is very good. I followed the "Shan Hai" book for the first time, but ended up opening a new book without saying hello or explaining. I was quietly convinced.

I feel that the author's power I received is not orthodox enough. Please turn around. I will receive the author's power in the orthodox Indian way 🙂

Sure enough, the author's words are not believable. He said he didn't want to be a eunuch but ended up being an eunuch again. Fortunately, I stopped reading it after it was released.

Readers, please seriously consider whether to follow up. This guy's updates are unstable, so I just cut a book.

I want to seize the throne of the Emperor of Heaven and drink the nectar!

Nima, the book "Shan Hai" is not finished yet, and a new book has been opened, which consumes readers' trust.

If the protagonist is Krishna, his death itself ends the era of duality and opens the era of struggle. If the protagonist does not die, this reincarnation will not end. Or should we say that the protagonist is not traveling through Krishna but Vishnu.

The author took the wrong path. His core advantage is actually that the protagonist's character is very stable, and the setting is actually secondary. In other words, when writing this kind of mythological fan fiction, you shouldn't focus on the setting. The blurred background will make it more interesting. The most important thing about the author Indra's book is that the protagonist's character is excellent. In the end, it was unfinished (in my opinion) because the protagonist's combat power increased too quickly. Things like Goldfinger should not obscure the shaping of the protagonist, and even the shaping of the supporting characters should be compromised, considering the characteristics of the author's writing.

Personally, I feel that it is okay to write about Krishna according to the myth, but if you change all Krishna's abilities to foreign objects and self-cultivation, then for what Krishna can do in the myth, you have to use reasonable methods to let him obtain the relevant abilities. Moreover, the dharma preached by Krishna's thoughts must also be expressed through other descriptions, otherwise you should not write it, because Krishna can be said to be a more special person in Indian mythology. As you write now, it feels weird. In mythology, a person is born divine and guides the world, but what you wrote seems to be that the divine descends to become a human and gives up everything, and then ascends again to guide the world. Then you have to describe how he now regains divinity and guides the world. Or by digging deeper into human nature, let him know what human nature is and how to use human nature to guide the world towards Dharma-rectification! Like the first film, Emperor of Heaven, you wrote it very well. Although it fell apart a bit at the back. But in the beginning, you gain and carry through loss, so that the Emperor of Heaven will not lose the background described in the myth. But now what you write feels like it has lost the background of the description of Krishna in mythology. And Indian mythology is not just mythology. It also contains philosophy. When describing, we should not only focus on mythology, but also consider philosophical issues. That's all

I recently watched an Indian movie, omg. The divorce in it was quite good. It did not directly refute whether God exists or not, but directly separated God and religion. Believe in God, but do not put God high in the temple and turn your faith into a business.