Imitator of God

The dungeon article is my casual way of saying it, and the meaning is very clear. It means that I have been playing different games through dungeons. Talk about the tallest mountain and longest river that I have to mention, "Thriller Paradise". I think the main theme of "Thriller Paradise" should be "level entry" or "adventure", similar to a game? Then mixed with some wits and thriller themes There are many novels in the [Level] and [Adventure] categories, such as "Horror Broadcast", "Global Collapse" and "First Player". The first two are more of a mixture of horror, fantasy and games. The fun part is the growth of the protagonist. "Ready Player One" is a bit more unique. It is the growth of a heroic protagonist in a doomsday game, similar to the creation of a god. This is also the cool point of "The End of Ten Days". "God's Imitation Criminal", that is, this book, actually does not have the setting of growing combat power with blood at all, which makes [Wits] more pure. Friends who are familiar with the author know that among the large list of references listed by the author, "Chainsaw" is at the top, and it may even be marked with "ranking order" (I hope someone can add a picture in the comment area) What does this mean? The author wants to deepen the dungeon from the perspective of [human nature] and give the dungeon the soul. It is not difficult to see that what the author did was relatively successful. This is the first great thing about this book. The second and my favorite part is the intrigue after the copy ends. Many friends may not like this part and feel it is watery. But I think this is precisely the greatest feature of this book. [Community] The small society in this veranda is wonderfully described. [Distribution] [Trial] [Elimination] These dungeon themes deepen this point. Then talk about the shortcomings. Just like the examples I gave at the beginning of "Ready Player One", "End of Ten Days" and "Thriller Paradise", the male protagonists are all very charming. Many readers even like the male protagonist more than the work. As for "The Imitation of God", that is, this book, the portrayal of the male protagonist is very little and very thin. Maybe you know the names of other players in the community off the top of your head. But my impression of the protagonist may be that he is very smart and understands human nature, Lawyer Lin. I can't remember the main character's name now either. He is too thin, and just like the title of the book, he is a bit godlike. Is this a failure? Maybe not. Anyone who reads the book carefully should be able to see that the author's description of the protagonist is currently in the form of a "hook", that is, leaving a lot of small descriptions that seem to be there but not at all. This can be [exploded] by responding to the foreshadowing later in the article. I boldly guess that the following article is likely to have a large character description of the protagonist, which focuses on becoming an excellent imitator of God until becoming a god (or becoming the most divine among humans but not separated from humans as the title of the book says) Then there is about "The End of Ten Days". Although it is highly discussed with this book, it is also a copy of the book with more prominent descriptions of "fighting of wits" and "humanity". But I think that although the two look very similar, there are obvious main differences. The cool point of "Ten Days" is more focused on the setting, which is the zodiac and the battles between various gods and the protagonist. The same is true for "The Foolish Play of the Gods". "Copycat" is more prominent in the discussion of [human nature] and [society]. Those who like a more popular, passionate and setting-oriented book will like "Ten Days", and those who like to delve into social aspects and explore human nature will like this book.

If someone were to ask me whether I would recommend this book, my rating would definitely be recommendation. Works of this kind of writing are enough to get rid of the assembly line industry chain and allow the author to make his own name. 🌿The current text volume of about 500 chapters is enough to keep people reading for a long time. The only drawback is that the update speed is slow and the experience of later updates is not good, but there is nothing we can do about it. It's hard to get the best of both worlds, quality and speed, and Zhi Dou is the type of writing that thrives on quality design. I recommend that new readers, like me, follow up on copies and reviews at a regular pace in order to get the best reading experience. 🌿Then let's analyze the taste of this book in detail. Let's put it down first, the author's writing style is not considered to be excellent, at least not among the top ones. A large amount of the novel's plot advancement relies on dialogue, and the amount of information about the rules is very dense, and it is difficult to explain it perfectly. There are a lot of purely mathematical parts in copy design. I personally skip these directly and complete the rule process through comments or review. 🌿 Some people will think that the cumbersome rules and high proportion of mathematics will reduce the quality of the novel, but on the contrary, it just shows how much complex considerations the author put into conceiving the copy. These complex considerations will ultimately make the quality of each copy extremely high, so that no matter whether it is a broken game or the optimal solution, it will be reasonable and extremely convincing in the end. 🌿Believe me, I have watched too many witty fighting works, and very few can do this. There are several top-notch copies of this book, some of the highest quality I have ever seen in my life. It's hard to imagine that these copies would appear in the same novel with such an outrageous density. I don't blame the author for the slow update speed at all. It's incredible that a purely online article can reach this level. 🌿 Let's talk about the author's ingenuity in conceiving the copy. I only realized it after seeing the author's own prompts in the middle. Most of the games in it have realistic prototypes and are typical psychological and sociological conclusions. The author expanded his ideas through these conclusions, and combined with the specific conditions of each role in each community, finally achieved batch high-quality copies. It is anchored by realistic evidence, and the final ending must be real and believable, and there will be no sudden plot killing of the characters. 🌿The second issue is planning. Taking the complete copy as a unit, the author obviously has his own framework. But this framework is far more than the length of one copy. The first volume alone has several long dark lines running across the entire text. The author who dares to do this in an online article is undoubtedly arrogant to the extreme. But under the premise of ensuring high quality, this complex frame design is simply a rare gem. Of course, this praise is arbitrary, and I only gave it after seeing the author finish the first chapter. 🌿Of course it's time to take stock of the shortcomings, because the author focuses on puzzles, and the pace of the novel is inevitably a bit monotonous. It's almost a copy-replay cycle. The advantage of this is that the structure is concise and clear, but the disadvantage is that it lacks the complexity and depth of literary works. But after all, this is an online article, not a literary work, and a simple structure is not a bad thing. 🌿Finally, let's talk about my personal views. Writing a book is essentially an expression of the author's own thoughts. The book is filled with a lot of criticism of social phenomena, which is essentially the expression of the author's own opinions. On this basis, the author also describes a superhuman character who is extremely divine, free from the world, and possesses decisive power. There's no doubt that it's not just the protagonist who wants to become a god. But then again, it is perfectly normal for Cai Fangkuang to be placed on the pen. Now that everyone has started writing books, it would be unsightly if they didn't pursue their writing. After all, we are all human beings, and killing gods is the highest pursuit of human beings. There is always an endless stream of similar attempts. At this time, we return to the title: God's imitator. It really makes me curious whether the author really pursues it or just imitates it. I will definitely follow this book. I really want to see the final result.

(Written in Chapter 618, the following contains minor spoilers) Let me talk about the title first. "The Last Dance" is the author's positioning of the book in the conclusion of the first volume. It took me about a week to read from Chapter 1 to Chapter 618, and stopped in front of the [Prison Factory] game. After reading it in one sitting, whether it is from my own reading experience or from the content and quantity of book reviews, the author has become more and more "self-admiring": specifically, he is not writing a book using the method of "daily updating of online articles". My reading experience can be summed up as a "W" shape. At the beginning of the first volume, the game of roulette and the trial of the king are both very eye-catching copies. Compared with those games with complex rules and numerous calculations later in the first volume, this type of copy that tortures human nature, has simple and clear rules, and involves social topics is obviously more in line with the expectations of online readers. Therefore, the early reading experience can be said to be very good, and the first order result of this book is also higher than the author expected. Entering the mid-term, for me, the beginning of [Optional Game] and the end of [Tarot Game] can be regarded as the low point of the first volume, which is the first place where the "W" sinks. Although there is a copy with a good concept like [Lifting Game] in this section, overall the protagonist's performance is not much, the game rules are complex and have been repeatedly pointed out by book reviews, and the large sections of complex rules are a disaster for the reading experience of daily online articles. If I didn't read it all in one go, I would probably stop at the "Games of Your Choice" or "Tarot Games" section, and wait until I remember this book one day before reading it again. The end of the first volume, as the climax of the volume, greatly improved my reading experience. Although many readers in the book reviews don't understand (such as why Lin was not killed), I don't think so. In the end, the two of them faced off for their own beliefs. No despicable way to win or a simple physical victory could satisfy them. Only by completely defeating the opponent mentally can they go further with their own beliefs. Their pride as S-class imitators brought them to this point, and it was reasonable. The other thing is the departure of community members. Some book reviewers think that the author is destroying the Great Wall and overthrowing all the supporting characters. But this ending is undoubtedly the best ending for them in this volume. Instead of dying inexplicably in a game like Xu Tong, it is better to say goodbye and return to the boring but peaceful real world. Finally, at the beginning of the second volume, the reading experience of the [Hospital] copy became worse again, which is also the main reason why I decided to write the title "Lonely Beauty". The protagonist does not appear in chapters 20 and 30 of this dungeon. After appearing, a prompt is given to Bo, and the new supporting character finds the imitator to end the game. Again, if I were following daily updates, the experience would be really bad. Writing this way in the Rigeng. Com article somewhat implies that "the author is immersed in his own art". Even in the book review section where I've been following this, there are voices of people abandoning the book. So I stopped after reading the next copy. If I were to write a book review again, it might be 2 million words later. Overall, the quality of this book is good, and both the early and final chapters of the first volume are very well received. The current results of this book are still impressive, and I hope the author's last dance can have a good ending.

It is a short fantasy unit drama in itself, but the rules are so complicated. The entries add up to several thousand words, and the reading experience is terrible.

There are good characterizations and story logic. 1. Characterization: Men, women, old and young have their own non-facial characteristics, which reflects that people are complex people, not people under labels. Good non-single-label character portrayals are rare in online articles and deserve encouragement and recognition. It shows that the author has rich life experiences and observations. 2. Story telling: The story has clear logic and the author has his own writing persistence. The author listens to the readers' opinions with choice and consideration, and does not give up the core of his writing and story ideas just to please the readers too much. In the end, after careful thinking, a quality story was presented, and an answer sheet worthy of the author was delivered. 3. Clear title: It facilitates the selection of readers with different preferences. We prefer to savor exciting and complete stories carefully, and clear title separation also facilitates more impatient readers. Accommodates and balances different readers' preferences to the greatest extent. ——Good reviews.

Recently the group portraits have been getting better and better. There is no absolutely perfect person in the world. As time goes by, everyone's shortcomings begin to be revealed. The rhythm is quite good. In the beginning, the crisis highlighted the weaknesses of human nature. As the situation gradually stabilized, some people began to feel good about themselves and felt that I could do whatever I wanted. They were born in worries and died in happiness. The game uses different scenarios to amplify these weaknesses so that people can detect them on their own, discover and correct them in time, and if they cannot correct them, they will be eliminated, thereby screening out more perfect people. The purpose of game design is to allow them to discover weaknesses and have a sense of crisis and urgency. If they don't correct it, they will die. And if they correct it in time, they still have a chance of survival, otherwise they will not be adopted. For example, the protagonist gave Lao Ding no sense of crisis, and the original blind date game had no way out, so it was rejected. So the absolutely perfect person is God, and everyone is on the way to get closer to God step by step. Imitation criminals are born with the rights of gods. Some people are just poor imitations of gods and judge from above. And like the protagonist, who can reflect on himself while designing the game, and even take the initiative to give up opportunities, and look at others while also looking at himself, can he go further. Does anyone say that the protagonist has no shortcomings? Is it possible that imitating God is a sin in itself, and the moment they enter the game they become "criminals" and are "committing crimes".

The writing is quite good, but because of the partial group portraits and the lack of timely feedback, it is not suitable for following updates every day. It is suitable to save a copy and read it together.

Full order, thank you Sister Qing for your courage. I learned about Sister Qing from Kuicheng Richest Man. Although I only read the interesting parts in the early stage, in my impression of the author, it can be regarded as ranking second to better. Later I saw that a new book had been opened and I read it. I found that it was about the same subject, so I stopped reading. I think that today's Chinese Internet literature, especially Qidian, is no longer a cool article that can satisfy the group of people who read Internet articles back then. Perhaps it is from Lord of Mysteries or from novels to animations that a large number of high-quality dramas have appeared, which further raises the threshold of cool dramas. I have also recently learned about this imitation of God frequently from other online writers and B-site ups. It kind of makes me travel back to the people who watched Infinite Horror, and experience extremely novel stories and thoughts. With infinite expectations and the fact that there are few books to read, this... Let's put it this way, the book I am reading recently is Lord of Mysteries (I have read it before, but I have never read it. The recent King of Kings linkage has aroused my curiosity as Miss Justice, and I have read the third volume now, and there is no movement), as well as the recently popular Baishi Book Stream and Cyber ​​Loan Stream (these have higher expectations than the son-in-law, and the setting is more exciting). These books, only The Imitation of God, make it very easy for me to read. I can even help my colleagues deal with problems at work and help my boss clarify my work ideas. While doing these things, my mind can seamlessly connect with the thoughts generated by the games in the book (I have been following 93 recently, and I have also bought a brief reading of Marx, The Wealth of Nations, Border Town, etc. And I am following them). The most important thing is that this book is really easy to read! Thank you, Sister Qing, for giving us this book. I also hope that the author pays more attention to physical health. You can imagine the pressure and tediousness of composing this book. I have also tried to conceive of a novel, but it is really time-consuming. It may only take a few minutes to read the 2,000 words, but it takes at least 2 hours or more to construct it. This is a little turtle given by a colleague (laughing)

Lin's image progression from a criminal defense lawyer to a veranda prosecutor/rule changer is handled extremely delicately. The defense hopes to ensure judicial fairness, and the establishment of rules is a necessary procedure for a fair trial in the veranda. As a simulation game, it has been created with considerable practical value. The truly outstanding trial rules are to maintain everyone's due position and fairness. Including suspects. Get what you deserve, rather than being carried away by emotions. I hope the author can maintain this solid writing style and look forward to the follow-up works.

After watching it, it is still very interesting, but the update is a bit slow. Come on, author

Player No. 1 Lu Xinyi Former community core No. 3 Played against the protagonist for the first time in blood poker Lost to the protagonist Later cooperated with the protagonist in the Fool's Game Tarot Game Except for blood poker, no defeat Player No. 2 Cheng Yin Former community assistant No. 3 Cooperated with the protagonist in the game of choice Succeeded to be taken away by the protagonist Player No. 3 Wang Yongxin One of the core members of the original No. 17 Community Kicked out of the 17 community by Cai Shuji and joining the 4th community as the core Entering the game many times to make money In terms of earning power Not inferior to the protagonist No. 4 Player He Xiaojun Original average player in the 14th community Achieving stability in multiple games Awakening in the Tarot game Joining the 4th community Player No. 5 Jiang Chenyan One of the core members of the original community No. 15 Cooperated with the protagonist in the tarot game Became famous for playing against the rival Wang Weidong in the same community Player No. 6 Xu Zhao The former assistant of the community No. 15 Later was selected as a copycat The only first-level game in the game was made by him The strength of the copycat is in shambles However, the auxiliary ability is not low! Player No. 7 Fu Yujun Fu Chen's father Debuted in the lifting game, MVP of the game Later appeared in the Hermit Trial, still the same ps: I suspect he is also a copycat, but I have no evidence Player No. 8 Song Xiao, make up the number Player No. 9, Huang Ming, make up the number Player No. 10, Kong Yuxin Make up the numbers Player No. 11 Chen Yumei Make up the numbers Player No. 12 Lin Sizhi One of the core members of the original 17 community S-class copycat Designed two S-class games Redemption Roulette and Simple Questions and Answers But he is unwilling to manage the community Only willing to lead everyone silently

Advantages: First of all, the theme setting is very novel. A group of people enter a new world and join different communities. They can only survive by participating in the game and obtaining visa time. Among them, the introduction of the concept of community is very interesting. The book involves many manifestations, differences, development, etc. Of community ideologies, which is full of profound meaning. Second, the protagonist's golden finger is satisfying and refreshing: the protagonist is a copycat, and can design game submission arcades, which has a certain dimensionality reduction impact. Third, group portraits: There are not that many depictions of the protagonist in the book, which makes it seem that the protagonist's presence is not high. And people like Li Renshu, Fu Chen, Cao Haichuan, Wang Yongxin, etc. All have their own character traits and thoughts, which further reflects the diversity of the community. Fourth, at the game level, if you look purely at the design, some are indeed complicated and cumbersome, but each game has its own intentions and considerations, from which we can get a glimpse of the ugliness, brilliance, and personal growth of human nature. It can still be seen that the author has put a lot of thought and effort into these games. Although there are some flaws, they are acceptable. Disadvantages: Except for the members of the 17th community, the portrayal of other characters is slightly weaker, resulting in no special memory points and a bit of facial makeup. The emotional portrayal is also not delicate, and there is no resonance in many places. Generally speaking, it's a bit high and low. I stayed up all night chasing after the previous chapters and couldn't stop. But the more I read the later chapters, the less I felt like it. On the contrary, it was very dull and boring. I hope the author will continue to work hard

A simple question and answer is about the old lady's foot-binding cloth, which is smelly and long. If I wasn't afraid of missing the plot, I would have skipped it.

I ordered it all, hoping to strengthen some of the main clues. The review section should be concise and to the point, not too wordy, so as to give readers space to think about it.

At present, we can only tentatively consider Huang Lin's discussion, third-perspective narration, etc. As absolutely correct. It would be a bummer if there were any lies in this "narration explanation" session. The information about the prison game is: Lu wanted Yao to join the game to assist Yao but recommended Lin. Lu killed Deng in it. Lu implored Lin not to say more after the game (covering his mouth afterwards showed that he was not fully prepared, otherwise it would be over if Lu and Yao entered the game. There is no need to let Lin Jin cover his mouth again). The narration said that Yao was very worried about Lu. These details actually point to a result. Lu Yao's camp must have unknown fears about this game, and killing Deng can only be a temporary act. So we come to the conclusion: Yao's decision to kill Wen was the same as Lu's decision to kill Deng Xiao. It is true what Qin said about weakening non-important figures in his own side to achieve low-level status. This is the message that breaks the prison in a few words. Then let's look at the information about the jury game. This game was made by Qin. The occupations of the four contestants: lawyer (Lin), businessman (Wang), detective (Tang), doctor (forgot). These four career choices are actually worthy of scrutiny. Businessmen and doctors have a certain base in the arcade. The businessman was chosen by Sister Qing, who wanted to bring Mr. Wang to the stage. The other three professions Qin Cheng chose are lawyer (most likely Lin, testing Lin, everyone has talked about this a lot), doctor (possibly himself, this is Qin's first game. He can't tell whether he will enter, if he does, he can better observe Lin and Detective in the first person), detective (I think this is Qin looking for Fianyan's imitator, because Fianyan Prison breaking is just one sentence reasoning. Reasoning enthusiasts are not professionals so they cannot act. There is a high probability that the arcade cannot use "hobby" as the screening basis, so the closest thing is the detective. In the end, Tang Qing got involved again by mistake) In the end, Qin cooperated to help him complete the psychological suggestion of killing Yao unanimously, and voted "no" in the referendum on Lu. Have you noticed this person? I think this person must be very important, maybe even a copycat, because from Qin's perspective, no one else is as trustworthy as Huang. But he still did not choose Huang as his vote, which shows that this person's identity surpasses Huang, and Qin must cooperate with him. So the final conclusion is drawn. The fourth imitator discovered that Qin was looking for him after the jury game. After contact, he reached cooperation with Qin and conspired to eliminate the Lu faction. Qin + the fourth imitator vs. Huang + Ye should be the main plot of the second volume.

I have only read the first volume so far, let me talk about my personal feelings This is a love letter to INTPs. Its basic elements are "games", which are novel and full of thinking at the same time. These basic elements are composed of "questions about the human heart", how people face their own human flaws, and how politics directly arises between people. This is exactly the key that INTPs need to get the answer to the "questions about the human heart"

Reading progress: Chapter 95 Advantages: It can be seen that the author has racked his brains to design the levels. Indeed, the current levels are quite entertaining and he also knows how to stimulate readers' emotions Disadvantages: 1. Compared with the excellent level design, most of the characters appear to be very stereotyped. There is only one interesting character so far, and he is from a different community... 2. The character of the protagonist... As the designer of this kind of killing game, he is too lawful, so lawful that it makes people feel a bit boring. Although I think the author does not want to write a story about a fun-loving person or an arrogant maniac who kills people, so he deliberately goes in the opposite direction and introduces other more extreme imitators, but doing so also further weakens the charm of the protagonist 3. There are also some small unreasonable things that make it easy for people to get into trouble. For example, out of a random group of seven people, four can fully explain three problems, and three can even quickly use mental arithmetic to come up with a complete probability table that is accurate to a few decimal places... Isn't that too ridiculous? If it's okay to say that games only attract social elites, what's going on with that delivery guy? 4. Although it can be seen that the author is very attentive and hard working... But I am not very optimistic about using online articles to write this kind of subject. It is quite difficult to keep from breaking down due to the pressure of updates and brain-burning; of course, if it can be maintained, it may still become a fairy grass ------------ Overall, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Book friends who like complex and brain-burning level design can read it.

Keep up the good work and fight for the first place. The third child will definitely not be able to catch up with you. What is that written? I couldn't stand it after reading about 10 chapters. The first one is about marginalia. Now it's a plot. I guess there won't be many monthly tickets. You have a chance 👍👍👍

Twelve men and women of different identities were invited into the new world to decide their own way of life through voting. At the same time, they had to participate in deadly games, and the designer of the game, the imitator of God, was among them. Think like God, judge like God, and commit serious crimes like God. A work with considerable depth, including a battle of wits, an exploration of human nature, reflections on certain social issues, and the joy of unraveling the mystery. While reading this book, sometimes you will have a sense of déjà vu as you are watching a unique werewolf killing. Compared with similar works, this book will focus on describing the thinking and situation of the game designer, thus forming a symbiotic relationship in which the imitator and the player are antagonistic and dependent, from which a unique plot and specific values ​​are derived. Highly recommended.

Results are important, but you are more important than you should be. Baggage is not a reason to abandon yourself.

Randomly select two fully populated communities to compete. A total of 40 people from eight other communities will be randomly selected to serve as spectators. 12 People from the confrontation community will decide who will be the coach, goalkeeper, and player. If more than 10 goalkeepers are scored, they will be punished by sudden death. If the coach loses the game, 2 of the 10 players on the field (randomly selected) will be punished by sudden death. Players who remain stationary for more than 10 seconds will be immediately deducted 5,000 yuan. Yu Shichang, one successful pass will get 5000 remaining time, one valid shot will reward 20,000 (regardless of whether the goal is scored or not), if there are more than three invalid shots (it will not count as long as there is a threat), 50,000 remaining time will be deducted, one goal will reward 100,000 remaining time, winning the entire game will collectively earn 5 million remaining time, one foul will deduct 20,000 remaining time, and one yellow card will deduct 50,000 remaining time. Often, a red card will result in an immediate death penalty, and 4 yellow cards will immediately convert into a red card, and the referee... Will reflect the collective will of the 40 spectators in the independent room after each foul prompt sincerely give their own choices, and deduct a fine of 10,000 against the true will of the heart. The remaining often does not affect the final collective will result. More than 5 collective penalties are unfair and one person randomly selected from the audience will suffer 50,000. The remaining time will be deducted. If there are more than 10 unfair penalties, one person in the audience will be punished by sudden death. Whether it is fair or not will be voted by another 100 off-site community spectators. To overturn the original referee's decision, two-thirds of the off-site spectators need to vote "unfair", and more than one-third of the off-site spectators vote "fair" to express their approval. Off-site spectators can bet on the ball Successful interception reward 2000 5000 for throwing a ball, double the score, and ten times the score. The goalkeeper will be rewarded 5000 for a successful save. A deduction of 20,000 will be awarded for losing the ball. A penalty kick will be rewarded 5000. Use a classic shot to reward 20,000.

Suddenly I found out that my monthly pass was about to expire

A very tense urban supernatural reading experience. This book combines urban life and supernatural power settings very naturally. The suspense rhythm is tight and the character selection also has a sense of substitution. Reading it gives you the motivation to continue to follow up. I look forward to the subsequent reversal and the expansion of the world view.

Help the interaction volume of the work~(￣▽￣~)~

Yep, another post. Because I went in with great interest to see how Fu Chen argued, but there was a question mark on my forehead, and I felt like I had been emotionally deceived. I can barely understand that the key point is why Cai tried to sue himself, but it would be better to explain why he was a copycat and could sue. What the hell is the length of the scene? Cai obviously has more presence than Fu from the beginning. Let me answer, just because Cai Judgment himself has not been discovered, it is worth S. Of course, the premise is that he is indeed the imitator who designed the king. Now the author has not given a 100% conclusion, so he can only speculate 90%. This is already a poorly discussed issue. I am naive, so I opened a new thread to explain from the beginning why Cai is speculated to be the second S-class, and Fu is not. It may be very long, very long, very long, please forgive me. Everyone who can finish it is a hero. ————————The dividing line of the argument———————— ♛♦♚ In order to refute the plot, let's start with Pangu. For the specific content of the King's Trial game, skip directly to ⑦ if the argument is useful. ① As soon as Fu Chen entered the community at the beginning, someone suspected him when he said he would have a white room for two hours. The first person to speak and no one questions it later can prove that there is no problem. Knowing that it is 2 hours, it is entirely possible that the room has a timer, but it was not stated in detail. Normally speaking, imitators should not be the first to speak. Come on, this isn't Werewolf. It's clear what you can say about the good guys. This is a world where everyone is coming for the first time. How can you make up the civilian perspective when you are the first to speak. What about a white room? What if someone else's room is not a white room but a dark room? Besides, I don't know the point of making up a fake experience before coming to the New World. If I want to refute it, I should refute the fact that the content within 2 hours is fake. ②Fu's hosting position was actually established by Cai. It can be seen that from the beginning, he wanted to output opinions and influence the situation, but he did not want to take the lead. The information of imitators is different from others, and leaders are prone to making mistakes. ③ When we first asked each other about the visa time, Fu Chen said one month and ten days, and someone else said it was not just xx days, but a lie. From my point of view, one may be that the author is afraid that some people will not see the meaning of 45 days, so he pointed out more than a month; the other is that people subconsciously convert conventional units, and he subconsciously answered after doing the conversion himself. For example, Lin's 117 days, at first glance, I don't know how long it lasted, but if it were almost four months, I would immediately have an idea. In this plot, Cai is invisible. I think it is because he needs to hide the information about the second imitator at this time. When he participates in the discussion, he has to reasonably avoid risks. If it is difficult to write, it is better not to write. On the other hand, it is also doubtful that he is a person who likes the Ba Ba rules so much and does not participate in the discussion of the initial standards. ④ Discussing the redemption roulette, Cai came up with the reason why, which is very consistent with the mentality of a copycat who just passed the test and believed that he was the son of God, but found that someone was better than him and I was dissatisfied. And he must think that he is also T0 among imitators. Everyone just wanted to see a case to discuss the rules, but he was obsessed with evaluation, implying that this game was not worthy of discussion. Is it reasonable in this situation? And it can be seen from his probability theory that he believes in avoiding risks by calculation. In fact, no matter how low the probability was, there was always a risk of death if he shot himself, but he was confident that he would survive. So in the King's Trial, he was confident that he had calculated everything, and the risk of death that was unavoidable in many people's eyes did not exist in his eyes. He is just so arrogant, and this whole discussion is a perfect example of his arrogance. ⑤ In the morning before the start of the King's Trial, Cai chatted with Fu. Let's not say whether his lack of sleep was due to his exhaustion in designing the game. Let's talk about the content of their conversation. It was clear to the player who opened his eyes. At this time point, the sudden mention of group battles and voluntary registration is more like a hope that more people from this community will participate and compete for audience quota to send barrages to protect players in this area. This can be regarded as a layer of insurance that is better than nothing. Moreover, he still induced Fu Chen to go and become invisible himself. Especially this hypothesis, is it too imitative of the prisoner's perspective, perfectly in line with the configuration of the King's Trial. ⑥ Regardless of whether the arcade will invite the person being judged to design a game, what will he do if he receives an invitation to judge himself? The answer is to work hard to get your game selected so that you can protect yourself to the greatest extent. From Cai's perspective, being selected should be high-risk (as can be seen from his evaluation of the kindness of the roulette wheel), so there is no need to design a peaceful game for yourself, which will only give the right of life and death to others. In fact, Lin Lu's low-risk game was passed. So he chose to leave himself a hidden backdoor in a high-risk game. The last sentence in the screenshot above can even be seen as a hint. Some people think there is still a risk, because Veranda is not stupid. How can he pass through the back door that can avoid danger 100%? Cai is not that naive. ⑦Finally we can talk about the game itself. Personally, I think King's Trial has four goals Goal 1: Save your own life Goal 2: Get rid of Ding Goal 3: Get rid of Wang Goal 4: Earn time for a visa Why S, I personally think he took his personal selfishness into consideration while saving his life, and almost achieved all the goals and ended it perfectly. In fact, when discussing social security, Cai was slightly opposed to it at first, and then specifically gave him a psychological activity of not thinking that he would be a weak person, so I think he felt that Ding was a drag on the community, and he would get rid of him if he had the chance. Objectively speaking, he left a way for Ding to survive, but subjectively speaking, he saw through Ding that he was 99% certain to die. For Cai, 1% means nothing. Therefore, King Dingdang will be able to reap the rewards from the audience to his death. Wang's words are probably a sign of trespassing. He may feel that they are a threat to his core position, or he may be simply annoying. He has also expressed his opposition many times in the future. What's more, there is a lot of money, and you can make money by harvesting blood. ⑧Cai's performance in the game Cai is such a talkative person, but he is unusually quiet in King's Trial. Farmer Shi could say that he didn't care, so only Wang explained what Lin meant. What happened next? Every time I emphasize that I am out of breath, is this really not an act? Looking at his post-trial description, it is basically mechanical and repetitive. The first time he spoke was to encourage Ding after disclosing his crimes. It can be seen as a kind of psychological suggestion that makes Ding feel innocent and guilty. Lay down the burden to judge others, the catalyst for injustice. The second time he spoke, he took the initiative to enter the first cell. Is he this kind of persona? Or should we calculate the probability that this one is the safest without opening the next few? No matter what Lin Lv said after that, it was Wang who explained it. Even when it came time to choose one of the two to launch a third trial, he still kept silent. Ding described it from his perspective as if he had given up on struggling, and asked Cai if he had such a weak character? I think he is confident. In addition, his low sense of existence also rationalizes the narrative perspective of this game. The farmer stage is Wang and the trial stage is Ding. So why did the author write this? Because we want to avoid Cai's psychological activities. ⑨The hidden insurance in the game rules ❶Ding is the King I won't go into detail about the match between the one-to-one weight-bearing racing and the large-scale courier. It is not only a trap for Ding, but also the first insurance. Because when a person from the same community becomes the king, he will most likely give priority to protecting his own people. Many people talk about the injuries caused by the farmer's walk, that is, they look serious, but they are actually skin injuries. You can't have a brutal game and leave no trace at all. Wang also suffered from hanging rope injuries, but Cai would have been uninjured if not for the farmer. ❷Cell No. 1 Let's look at the description of the cell: What is the majority, that is, there are a few whose lives are not in danger for the third time. Then the punishment in the first cell is also the most ambiguous. What is step-by-step increment? Will it be too strong to bear? Not necessarily. The lethal factors in other cells are clearly visible. What's more, passive grinding does not specify the speed or increase the time. If the rest time is long enough, why can't you persist? ♥This is the second level of insurance and the largest guaranteed insurance. ❸The King's Camp It seems that he is on the King's side, but in fact he is on the front line of sending the King to his death. In addition to accelerating the process of injustice, it also protects low-risk cells in disguise. Because the more dangerous cells are where people die faster, they will definitely give rewards to choose the later cells first, and the first cell, which seems to be the safest, will be saved for last. This is the third level of insurance. ❹Prisoner Camp Needless to say, this must be to protect the prisoners. And the number of 3 people is pretty good. It doesn't matter if the first one dies is the first step to ensure that the king can take the first step out of the slippery slope. Then guard the second one for a while. If you can't hold it, the king's side may weaken the reward because less than 3 people have met the victory conditions. The last 2 people are a little safer. The relatively weak fourth level of insurance. ❺Fair trial This is to kill the king and protect yourself. It's probably the first thing many people think of as insurance, but actually I don't think it's absolutely necessary. It's probably more about Ding's murderous intention. It can be seen from Ding Duan's psychological struggle that he will eventually choose the two to protect one. It goes without saying who he will protect between Cai and Wang. The fifth level of insurance is optional. Thinking about it this way, the number of trials 10 times is quite good, and it is worthy of the great algorithm. Not to mention that the prison cell is so harsh that it must be unfair, Ding's paranoid view of fairness after the blood poker is also foreshadowing. This king is bound to die, it depends on the point at which he dies. Maybe Cai is still cursing in his heart, why is it so early, wait until I am the only one left to start it, the profit will be the greatest, and the three dead people voted perfectly, I don't even have to take the blame! ♠To sum up, Cai has designed insurance for himself at almost every step. He has achieved near-perfect returns and managed to become invisible. He has calculated people's hearts to death. Why can't he be S? ! And he was smart in that he did not favor himself, but reserved a position and then grabbed it himself. ⑩ It can continue. During the review stage, he was the only one to speak, and it was like he was competing with Lin Lu. Have you really seen through my game? This kind. Also, is this the only game that doesn't have a detailed review? Although the reason given was that someone was dead so he was not in the mood, was it really not because of Cai's identity that he couldn't do it? He is the kind of person who must be loud during the review stage. It was just a review that still needed to be done, so Cao Linfu came to do a small review. Compared to Cai's anomaly, I don't think Fu's doubts were staged. His inclusion is more like asking some questions that Cao and Lu both tacitly agree on but readers still have questions about, which fits his silly and sweet persona. 11. (No more circles) Modifications of the blind date game Although I still don't understand why the other suggestion for blind date was given by an S-level person. This person must be Fu Chen. Where is the causal relationship? But I still want to say that it is not necessarily an S-level one, because the imitators who gave the advice must be more than 2 people. Let's take a look at "a large number of failures" and "these imitators". This means that more than one design needs to be modified, right? Does the fact that Lin Lu only received one copy mean that there are other outstanding imitators who received others? Could it be that only the S is left? When the Fool Game invited revision, Lin Luyou judged that all those who were incompetent had been eliminated, so the only one who could not be eliminated was Zhong Yuanyuan. (It turns out that there is a limit of 10 illustrations for posting!) In addition, the first piece of advice for blind dates is to collect likes to avoid death. Is this the style of a king's trial? Also, Wei has been through so many times since the primary election and has only passed the review once and still got a B. How can she be excellent? 12. Off-site attribute information This is the reason why everyone generally excludes payment. The five-pointed star given by the author, Fu Chen's layout is 5 good and 10 evil. In terms of ability and morality, he is not capable of designing the king's trial. So far, the payment system has been quite stable. Of course I insist that the author is just giving examples, not necessarily real character settings. If you have strong reading comprehension skills, you have the final say. 13. Doubts about the Shelter Game This is actually a bit subtle, mainly because "any way to avoid death" refers to death-free coupons, and it seems that other communities don't know about it. It also seemed to be directed at Cao, but not that strongly. In addition, there is the issue of whether the three games King, Chaebol, and Sanctuary were designed by the same person. I think the shelter is an upgraded version of the combination of the first two. All three have a high position on the surface (king, chaebol, privilege); similar to the king, they have a hidden camp and influence the inner court, and the audience benefits from the inner court, one by one trial + voting against their will; both like the chaebol and like to count money, the rules are complicated and divided into modules, and the money circulates in different modules. The overall structure is similar (← this can only be understood). Also, the three are suspected of being invisible during the review stage. King ⑩ has said it. He participated in the chaebol, but he asked Qin Yao to explain the strategy to Lin Lu during the review. Isn't Cai the one who likes to show off during the review? Only at the end did he explain his strategy for Luo Wei and incidentally answer a low-probability question from Fu Chen. However, there is a chapter that mentions that inducing Luo to betray is very similar to the routine of inducing Ding (this is a matter of opinion). After this game, Wang really didn't believe that he was the real one, thinking that he was just an assistant. In the review of several chapters of Sanctuary, Cai Weier's speech was to argue that Cao's ending would not change. Did he want to prove how professional he was in designing the trial? I specifically re-confirmed all the reviews. Other than these three, he is basically the main player. Even if the fool is explained by Mamoru, the designer, he has also brushed his presence on the lead-filled dice. Moreover, Wei Yinzhang was introduced here, and it was logical that he would become invisible again in the shelter, and Wei would come. In fact, it's not that reasonable, right? Why is it that Hao Wei's game-breaking ability is not high, and he can preside over the replay with just his experience in imitating offenders? 14. Officer Cao's intuition Actually, I was quite surprised that Cao was off the line. I always thought that his life-saving imitation criminal pursuit line was not completed, but I didn't expect it to be cut off immediately. Can it be considered that he has given out all the clues he should have given? What did he give? The king's trial is too targeted and it is suspected that an acquaintance committed the crime + the imitator may try himself. After screening these two conditions, only Cai Wang is left. Whether it was Wang's main perspective during the trial or his outburst during the review, it was not what a copycat should have. He even made a proposal to Lee to kill the copycat, from a completely civilian perspective. Except Wang, there is only Cai. If Cao's guess is denied, then the entire line of this character will become meaningless. Finally, enjoy the original words of Officer Cao: "Suppose that a copycat really designed a game to judge himself, the optimal solution is definitely not to obtain a superior identity. "It is best to let others become a superior identity, choose a weak identity yourself, and then find a way to get through. " ————————The dividing line that is finally completed———————— Wow, I almost reached the upper limit of the number of words, setting a record! Everyone who can see this should give a warm applause (0 people), amazing! I feel so good after I finished output~

⭐️Involves serious spoilers . . . . . . . . . . . Volume 1 Volume 2 Detailed information about each game At first I was a little curious about the timeline of the story, but I didn't expect that as I was doing it, I also included the relationship between the characters. I hope it will be helpful to book lovers. If there are any mistakes, book friends are welcome to correct them. 2026.8.15 Updated to [One Side of Words] Start

🦉Serious DramaAttention ⭐After finishing the whole book, I realized that there are so many small daily details that are not very impressive. After making the collection, I realized that there are quite a lot of them. ⭐A large collection of pure original text settings, which can be regarded as a way for readers in need to interpret Lin Luyong's posts on their own. I don't understand it myself. 10 pictures in total One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten The first volume ends with flowers~ By the way, I also compiled a setting post of Lao Cai's original text, the name is this "🦜Complete the settings and foreshadowing related to Cai Zhiyuan in the original text", if you are interested, you can also check it out

[Serious spoiler alert] [The plot related to Lao Tsai is almost finished] ❄️It is a foreshadowing of the identity of the suspected imitator 🦜It is character information, including personality, etc. ⭐It is an act of manipulating the community Reworked after the hermit trial, a total of 10 pictures One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten I also compiled a collection of Lin Lu's original settings, titled "🦉Complete the settings related to Lin Sizhi in the original text (Volume 1)". You can also take a look if you are interested (show your heart)

The writing is very good, and it looks like someone who has been a god. The writing is very real, and it matches my experience of being a god. Come on!

1. "Redemption Roulette": The classic "Three Doors" theory, a discussion of human subjective malice, and an "S" level evaluation of the arcade. People with good intentions will be safe. As long as one of the six bullets is aimed at themselves, they can survive. But a person who is extremely selfish and uses up six bullets on innocent people has lost his qualifications as a human being.         2""：，，"A" "Life can be quantified", 200ml of blood can be exchanged for chips, the machine cannot "fold" to win huge chips, and the classic "bluff" at the gambling table, etc., Starting with "distributing chips", introduces the horror of gambling. 3 "The King's Trial": Prisoner Theory, Discussion of "Fairness", Veranda "S" Level Evaluation. A takeaway accident, five criminals, and ten spectators. When the low-level deliveryman became the "king" of the trial, he lost the kindness and innocence he once had. Even if he had "one hundred thousand time", he still continued to kill for "half a million time" (the bait to continue killing), but was voted back by the prisoners. The good and evil of the bottom people, the guidance of the Internet, and the persistence of the original intention, show the ultimate wisdom. 4: "Power Theory": Community and community, community and individual, and the particularity of "three, five, and seven" are reflected everywhere in the daily life of Community No. 17. "Opinion leaders", "men and women's rights" and "group confrontation" constitute the background of Community No. 17. 5 "Dating Game": The confrontation between men and women, the discussion of magic, the arcade is rated "C". "Like", "dislike", "interesting", and "boring" all have their own effects. Through the selection and 10-minute conversation between the protagonist and the "fat cat", the relationship between "finding women and men" and the entire group is discussed in a surreal way. Writing at the end: This book gives me a very familiar feeling, and the author also admits that he has borrowed from other works. The book is very interesting. Discussions about the plot are welcome, and I look forward to the author's updates.