For Reform, I Face Death Without Fear

As expected, the history circle is still a bad one. The comment section is already noisy, but we can still get together to read the same book 😄

In order to support the bourgeoisie, they deliberately tied the bourgeoisie to the army, hoping to replace the landlord class, and even tricked the imperial power and many scholar-bureaucrats into siding with them. But there are several core issues. First, the production relations of capitalism are only more advanced than feudalism, not to mention that in the early stage of capital accumulation, it felt stronger than serfdom, but also limited. Second, if the level of productivity is not reached and capital is transferred by force, exploitation will become even crazier, capital's ability to withstand risks will be even worse, and the conflict with the feudal landlord class will become more acute, which is basically out of the question. Another one that is more disgusting is to form a women's federation. Haha, women's liberation is not the kind of deconstruction and narrative of women's rights. The core of women's liberation is still the class issue, which requires overthrowing three mountains. You support the imperial power, support the capitalists, and even establish a women's federation. To be honest, I am really disgusted. The so-called women's problem in the article is basically that the level of productivity is low. Compared with the core production positions, men must be more cost-effective. Even if the author also writes about the textile industry, if it is so popular, do you think that if male workers do not consume a lot of heavy industry, will the textile industry recruit female workers? Secondly, don't read many articles about so-called patriarchy. The core is actually feudalism, feudal society and feudal thoughts. Don't expect these people to betray their class. Wu Zetian can have female officials, but there is no women's federation.

If you die for your country, you will become an immortal! Let's not talk about how to judge the credibility of the idea that you can become an immortal after death! Judging from the introduction, Pig's Knuckle believes in and wants to realize it as soon as possible, so why would he choose the most troublesome method of reform? ! If you go to suppress the bandits, do you think you are serving the country and the people? If you go to kill the cavalry of the Liao Kingdom and Xixia plundering the border, do you think you are serving the country and the people? Even if you find a corrupt official to assassinate, you are also killing traitors for the country! Wouldn't it be quicker to die than if you offended people by enacting reforms? 🤓

Why should the protagonist, a good man from nine generations, do anything good when talking about cross talk? In the tenth life, I died for the sake of death. I am selfish. I am a pure villain. How can I be considered the best?

If the protagonist does not become the emperor, then the protagonist must carry out comprehensive changes that limit the emperor's rights. It is useless if the protagonist just copies the technology of later generations and adds a few reforms. If a country wants to produce a large number of original inventions and creations, it must carry out systematic changes in ideological foundation, political structure, legal system, social forces and other aspects. The reason why Britain was the first to enter the Industrial Revolution is that after experiencing the ideological changes of the European Renaissance, coupled with the British Glorious Revolution of 1688, the king's rights were further restricted. Britain established the framework of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law, and the bourgeoisie, the new aristocracy, and the king formed a check and balance, which allowed British civilians to gain unprecedented freedom. At this time, the degree of freedom of scholars, craftsmen, and farmers in Britain was higher than that of other European countries at the same time, and it was far more liberal than the civilians of China's Ming and Qing dynasties. The high degree of freedom of all British civilians fully inspired everyone's strength. The power of the Chinese emperor was not greatly restricted, and all officials, gentry and landlords were dependent on the imperial power. The freedom of civilians, who account for the vast majority of the country's population, is too low. This system inhibits innovation and hinders social development. China's Zhou Dynasty was a feudal system, and the central government could not control much of the local princes' affairs. The princes competed with each other. During this period, Chinese civilization truly allowed a hundred flowers to bloom. Most of the essence of Chinese civilization came from this period. During the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, the "Mo Jing" recorded the principles of optics and mechanics, and the germination of geometry had emerged; the "Gan Shi Xing Jing" recorded astronomical observation data. But from the Qin Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty, there was almost no progress! The institutional innovation of the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods stagnated after the Qin and Han Dynasties, lacking the ability to dynamically adjust. Since the Qin Dynasty, especially since the Han Dynasty deposed all schools of thought and only respected Confucianism, Chinese civilization has almost stood still and entered a dead end. The Zhou Dynasty and the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period were similar to the ancient systems of most European countries. They were all feudal systems. Even in successive years of war, less than 10% of the country's total population died directly or indirectly as a result of the war. But from the Qin Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty, every dynasty would kill half or more of the country's population due to war! What is even more tragic is that every time there is a change of dynasty, there is almost no progress in the system and culture! {"NickName":"Restriction and Supervision","UserId":417773267}

I don't understand why the protagonist must become a disciple. This kind of setting usually involves lonely ministers. Wouldn't it be nice to cooperate with others? It's just a mindless and enjoyable article, so why can't it be enjoyed to the end? Get an apprenticeship

If you don't centralize power and don't have soldiers, what is the change? The most convenient way to die for the country is to go to the border. Just charge into any conflict without armor.

It is recommended to charge authors a breathing tax and pool their money to build the country so that authors can be more patriotic.

It's really easy to deal with people like the protagonist. Isn't the protagonist going to be a saint and a blue sky? I am your opponent. I will immediately corrupt his family and friends. The simplest way is to give you the beauty of White Moonlight. Do you want it? If you want it, let the beauty secretly engage in loan sharking, fraud, smuggling, and gambling without telling your family. The simplest way is for the villain to find a girl of his own, and then deliberately arrange for people to cooperate in killing and threatening her. When the protagonist sees it, will he save her? At this time, arrange for the girl to rely on the protagonist's family. You can't guard against this, right? Then let this woman do bad things on purpose. Maybe the protagonist will have servants and friends later on, and there will be various methods of coercion and inducement to trick you, and various traps will be dug, but there will always be one that will fall into your trap, right? I'm going to expose you at this time, the protagonist, what are you going to do? Should you kill your relatives and friends or not?

A classic and mindless novel, the main character is sure to succeed when he wants to do something, and there is also an introduction. Why should I scold Wang Anshi? It's all about praising the protagonist and scorning everyone else.