Transmigrated into The Sword Stained with Royal Blood with Xiao Feng's Talent

I have read several Jin Yong fan works, and the fan is considered the leading author. I have also reviewed and recommended it, but if the political, military, rules, and character descriptions of Jin Yong's martial arts are not the same as yours, you can just deal with them with a gun and a stick. The views can be argued, but can the author discuss them calmly?

Li Zicheng never betrayed the peasant class, nor did he engage in large-scale burning, killing, and looting after conquering Beijing. He was a real hero. His failure was that he failed to cooperate with the landlord class, and he still looked at the problem from the perspective of farmers and did not become a member of the landlords. He was eventually strangled by the Qing Dynasty slave owners and Han landlords.

Isn't this Wen family drama over? If you need to fight, hit, if you need to kill, kill! And why is the protagonist competing with Yuan Chengzhi in front of the Wen family? What is the author thinking about?

The new book has a novel angle, but as the author you have to establish your credentials to ensure that it will never be unfinished 😡

What a crappy title this book gives me, it gives me the impression of a short, fast, low-quality and refreshing article.

People are willing to believe in the theory of martial arts degeneration, but you can't explain it no matter how many chapters of the original novel you use. Why? Because people won't tell you about the original novel directly, they only want to believe what they want to believe. For example, if the author takes out a certain chapter in the original work to explain that someone has practiced a certain unique skill of the seventy-two Shaolin skills, to prove that the other person is very strong, but of course it is not the same, the other party can just say that this unique skill must have been lost, and what he practiced is definitely not the original version. Then you use the original book where someone has practiced a certain secret skill to prove that he is very powerful. The other party can definitely say another sentence. He must have practiced it to a incomplete version and has no mental skills to exert force and movement. Then you use someone in the original book who has practiced some kind of unique skill to prove that he is a master. The other party can definitely say another sentence, and what the other party has practiced must be a simplified version. But does it say in the original novel that what they practiced was not the original version? Did you say that what they practiced was a mutilated version? Did you say they were practicing a simplified version? No! But they won't talk to you about the original work at all. If you let them read the original description by themselves. I won't watch it anyway! Not interested in the original novel! Anyway, just one sentence from me, I think they are practicing either the original version, the incomplete version, or the simplified version! The original novel didn't say that they were practicing a mutilated version of martial arts, so I don't care! Anyway, I believe in the theory of martial arts degeneration. As long as I put aside the facts, I don't believe you can argue with me. What can you do? It's useless if you bring out the descriptions in the original novel. Even if you bring them out, I still think he's practicing an incomplete version, and you can't win against them.

Stop messing around!

The author's writing is good, but there is too much inner drama.

It's really rare to see martial arts novels written with such flavor. 3 Monthly tickets will encourage you. Come on and update ~ I love you.

It's best not to change your vest when opening a new book. In today's context of entertaining novels, it's not easy to accumulate some readers who love martial arts. Because you don't want to change the characters and stories in the original novel, it's hard to write that kind of entertaining novel.