Doomsday Version Update

The protagonist just wears human skin and is not a human being.

It's too rushed, one after another. The protagonist needs to rest, and the readers also need to stop and slow down. It would be more reasonable to have a plot of returning to the main world interspersed between the two dungeons.

The bad thing is that the script keeps changing, but the protagonist's own world lacks superhuman abilities.

It feels like a different version of Meat Dove Infinite Flow. Each world is about saving the world, or else just surviving. The protagonist only has memories, but no strength. Each world is given a template character identity.

The disaster part is well written, but I don't understand the protagonist's goal, or the author's goal. Why does the protagonist always suffer like this? After suffering, what happens next? It doesn't look like a parallel world, it feels like I'm in the underworld and being punished One after another, one after another, one disaster after another, without any respite after one, the next one will come soon, what's the point, as long as this continues, normal people will sooner or later go crazy, or lie down, die after each disaster, and then continue to die after the next one

Isn't the protagonist a tsundere? He kept talking about "emergency food", "because it can be of some use", and "won't take risks to save people". In the end, he saved people.

I think I can write a few chapters to make the transition after the copy ends with real life. Otherwise, aesthetic fatigue

The most outstanding thing about this book so far is the doomsday of heavy rain. The subsequent copies are not very outstanding. It can be seen that the author has polished the first copy very carefully. However, there are many problems so far. First, each doomsday is just a superficial taste, without fully developing the world view, and it comes and goes in a hurry. Secondly, there is no clear main line. Why does the protagonist keep traveling through the doomsday? What is the meaning? If the protagonist dies in the doomsday, will he then restart the worldview and enter the next doomsday, or will he die completely? I'm not sure about these. In the end, there are still too few updates. In fact, I think apocalyptic articles should have a more urgent pace and concentrate the amount of information. They can't have as many words as other online articles. Moreover, compared to the recovery of spiritual energy or the disappearance of men, I would rather read about natural disasters, such as super-large earthquakes and the continuous loss of oxygen.

Many years ago, there was also a book dedicated to escaping in the apocalyptic world, Eunuch, with hundreds of thousands of words written. Does anyone still remember it? The protagonist wants to travel to another world, which will bring about the end, and then escape, and can leave when the survival time is up.

As for this, I thought it was a bad book released after the world version update. I didn't expect that the author was different, but there must be a reason why I didn't pay much attention to the author's name.

I think the connection between the disasters is a bit too blocky. I feel that the two disasters are seamlessly connected, and it seems a bit caught off guard. How about leaving some time in between to settle? You don't need to leave too much, it feels like you can take a breather. Also, isn't it too unnatural for you to be constantly changing? The plot is really a little stuck, too little, not enough to watch.

A disaster novel in which the protagonist has a brain is not selfish, not holy, and not clever.

The first copy has a strong sense of instantaneity, which is quite similar to a novel I have read that starts with a snow disaster. At present, there are already four worlds in Chapter 50. It always feels like it was too fast and it ended abruptly without being enjoyable.

The writing is quite good, but the connection and settings behind it are a little less interesting. The cutscenes are also lackluster.

Personal power is powerless in the face of nature. So if there is no transcendence, the protagonist will be awesome if he can survive on his own, but it will be very divorced from reality and have no sense of substitution. Sooner or later you will have to pounce.

The protagonist raises several women to use as emergency food if there is not enough food later, although the plot does not develop to that point.

Lucky readers are picked at random and thrown into the disaster version.

The Reiki chapter is good, you can touch the edge of the original seeker.

Apart from the introduction, what kind of disaster do readers want to see?

I have read a similar novel before, much earlier than this one. The specific content is that the world where the protagonist lives will change versions every once in a while, but the protagonist's ability can determine which version he will go to next, and the abilities and items owned by the protagonist will not be erased due to the change of world version. A famous powerful person in the immortal version may be the mayor of a certain city in the urban version. In the version of cultivating immortals, the protagonist may just be a third-level casual cultivator of Qi refining who is subordinate to others, but in the urban version, he is an immortal master who is superior to others.

What a great guy. Except for the end of the first heavy rain. Take a short break. What follows is like rushing to a game, with no breaks in between.

No, man, our rhythms are too wrong.

Do you want one volume for each disaster?

So far, it seems that except for the train, everything else is pretty good.

Let me add, this is not directed at the author, but the subject matter is a bit heavy and very niche~

It's not interesting. The protagonist is a pure ordinary person. At most, he is an ordinary person who is prepared. He has no power at all. No matter how ruthless the character is, the protagonist will send it to you.

The version is updated too fast. At this speed, the protagonist should experience the previous disaster again.

The whole thing turned into a political essay?