Chinese Showbiz: The Age of Genius

Just a word for latecomers, the protagonist of this book, the unspoken actress, failed and was caught red-handed.

It's just a soul-wearing green-haired turtle. The first piece he wrote is a stupid dog article. It's rubbish.

1. The protagonist's character is too soft, he is just an honest person who understands finance, and is not suitable for starting a business and becoming a leader, so the tone of the whole book is extremely strange. 2. Finance combined with movies is indeed innovative, but the priority should be clearly distinguished. It is mainly entertainment. After all, financial memory depends on making movies, so it is enough to occasionally intersperse financial content with a chapter. If you write it in such detail, it will only slow down the pace and make people feel confused. Otherwise, you should write specifically about finance. 3. The author is a literary youth, has too many psychological activities, and is proud of his writing style, but these invalid contents are just procrastination, making the whole story smelly and long. Everyone can tolerate the occasional private information, after all, it is your work, but forget it if it is a long story. No one can bear it if you describe something in one sentence and a few paragraphs. 4. There is a problem with the rhythm of the whole book. I guess the author doesn't want to write about the shooting, release, box office reviews and then continue on to the next movie, so there are a lot of details and behind-the-scenes interspersed. But you can't write condiments as the main course. The first film was stretched to more than 200 chapters, and readers couldn't get any feedback at all. Otherwise, you can write about the path of a producer, and one company will shoot many films. If you write the protagonist and direct it yourself, you won't be able to control the rhythm. 5. There is something wrong with the feeling of the text or the style of writing. I personally feel that reading this book is like a greasy, dark rainy day. It does not have the uplifting and sunny feeling of career writing at all. This is purely a self-feeling.

I hope Qidian can come up with a function that can block authors.

The previous article is very good, but suddenly a female passerby came out and was pregnant. This operation was like the old coal boss's old hat. Iow Also, Liu Yifei's salary for signing three films was about the market price of the first one, and then it increased tenfold (the update is too slow, it may not be accurate after a long time), then what is the meaning of signing three films in a row? I don't understand, if it is to determine the market price of the schedule. , You gave her a salary increase for the next two movies before the movie was even made. Even if the increase is 20%, I can understand that you are too licky. You have to know that you are not just a director but also a capital. Her mother can't be offended if she doesn't talk about maintaining relationships. Reality may not require logic, but novels do!

I was alarmed when I saw that it was on the shelves and there was no intention of releasing it. I looked at the catalog and found that it was already 200 chapters in and has not been released yet. My expectations for the excitement of the first movie were completely dashed. According to the author, there was not enough time, it was only more than a year, but you have made several movies during this period. You really wanted to release it long ago, so you deliberately delayed it. But you must know that the longer you delay, the higher the readers' expectations for box office and entertainment. But why is the quality and box office of your first low-cost movie higher than the ones you shot later, and the box office of the original film was only average, which is too contrary to logic.

No one from Huayuwen posted pictures?

I can lick it. With a salary of 30 million for 3 movies, I really know how to provide help in times of need.

It's OK to update it. Don't listen to those who say don't write about stocks. This is the characteristic of this book. If you remove it, you may not continue to read it. The homogeneity of entertainment literature is too serious.

It can be seen that the author has a strong knowledge background and careful preparation when writing this book. But precisely because of this, I feel even more pity. If professional knowledge is superficial and other writing, such as pretentiousness and daily life, is watery, I think it is more appropriate to open it at 30-70, and it can be read relatively smoothly at 40-60. If it is 50-50, the writing will be very stagnant and boring. However, I feel that this book is written backwards. The popular science of movies and financial terminology are all very professional, which makes people confused. There are a lot of things that should be pretended but not done, and there are a lot of things that should be written that are not written down. For example, after making so much money, how does the protagonist live, buy a house and a car? Having made so many movies, what do your peers think of the protagonist? The audience should flatter her, and the female stars should not have the admiration they deserve? If these are added together, the characters of this book can be greatly brought to life, and the reading will not make people (mainly myself) feel stuffy and boring. Of course, the author has his own writing style and writing goals, and may value self-expression more, so I understand respect, but it is still a pity. //If this comment affects the atmosphere of the book review area, the author can delete it directly.