What's Wrong with a Government Official Keeping a Few Monsters?

I don't know what I'm writing about. I've taken several pictures and I can't see what the main line is about, enjoying life? Cultivate your demons? Protect one party?

Just like the title, it's like a cold chicken rack, it's flavorful and meaty, but it's delicious when you first eat it. As you eat, you realize that there's very little meat. The protagonist looks like a gamer, a chess player, but this 13 is really annoying. It's not mellow at all, half-hearted, and pretentious. But, but, it's worth a look even when you're free. The chicken rack is still delicious when you're killing time.

Keep the quality and the results will definitely get better and better. As for what the comment section said about the protagonist not overthrowing the dynasty, it is a diode. There are many ways to improve people's livelihood, and overthrowing the dynasty is the last and most compelling way. The prince in the book obviously has the appearance of a king, and Ling Yu also has the idea of ​​loyalty to the emperor and patriotism. Moreover, the protagonist takes the initiative to guide the prince to discover the truth, and guides the two princesses to face up to their own desire to take power and eliminate bad governance. If they can bring peace to the world, isn't it also changing the world? Overthrowing a dynasty requires war, and many people will die in war, but in a top-down change, only vested interests will die. Taking a step back, although the protagonist has magic around him, he is obviously not the kind of person who is suitable for shouldering the world. It is obvious that the protagonist likes a relaxed and comfortable life. When the time comes, it will really be like pig's feet to rule the world, and the character will inevitably collapse, and you people will have to criticize the author for being too high and too low.

For the record, there is not a single negative comment among the 81 comments. There are only two possibilities for this situation. Let's wait and see.

I can feel that the author wants to write some meaningful plots and stories, but the heat has not yet reached home. After 20 chapters, it feels like I am still in the same place. It is very awkward to read. So what is there to write about the story of the county magistrate's scholar son and the female ghost? The man has a relatively good background, but is incompetent, and the woman is just an idiot who falls in love with a man because of some superficial rhetoric and some nice love words. It's a waste of words. If you really want to write a good plot and story, let's not talk about reading the four major classics, but just talk about what some really powerful platinum authors in Qidian have written. You export your personal views and thoughts too often, and I think the actual actions of the protagonist should be written to create the character image, rather than the protagonist being constantly blabbering and frantically outputting his own opinions to shape the image. I'm tired of it.

After reading the latest chapters, I feel completely different from the previous ones. In the past, they were mostly people cultivating immortals, but now the sky is full of gods and Buddhas. Earlier, I thought the protagonist was leading the way to the gods in this slowly recovering world. But now it seems that this world is not recovering at all, but has always had the fighting power to destroy the world.

Isn't this paragraph of writing about the revenge of the wronged soul too harsh on the victim? The scholar surnamed Zhang is indeed cowardly and incompetent. He is indeed angry at his father who is the county magistrate for blaming the playboy for escaping punishment, but his father is not innocent either. Perhaps his father can only govern the place better by colluding with the local powerful in this way, but the playboy can do it without any scruples. To cause trouble in all directions, isn't it because the place where the law should be maintained has been bribed? There is a cause and effect on each other. In this case, although he may have no choice, it is not surprising that under the coercion, he still planted the evil cause himself in exchange for the bad consequences of the report by his filial son. As well as criticizing the victim who committed suicide regardless of her parents, and blaming the scholar for not risking his life to avenge his wife, isn't this a bit contradictory? Let a woman who commits suicide for the sake of chastity say that she is a rotten person who has failed her parents, but does not mention at all the despair faced by women who lose their virginity in this kind of feudal society. Doesn't the woman commit suicide to prove her innocence in the hope that the justice of the law can avenge her? Then the corrupt magistrates are helpless, and the woman who proves her innocence is just sorry for her family. On the scholar's side, if a woman commits suicide regardless of her family, she is a dead person. But on the scholar's side, can she exchange her life for her life regardless of her family? Why does it matter if a woman proves her innocence? Why should a victim woman say that she is a rotten person? There is also the dandy who is the real perpetrator of all the things. Why can he say that he is better than any scholar because he does not cheat on others? Of course he doesn't need to cheat on others. He is the biggest beneficiary of the collusion between rich and powerful people. He can do evil everywhere without being punished, so why does he need to cheat on others? The scholar hates his father and hates him for shielding criminals. He is unreasonable and angry without considering the need to govern the county. Not taking revenge is incompetent and cowardly. These evaluations are fine, but is it reasonable for an evil playboy who stands with vested interests to be evaluated as having a higher personality than the victim of his evil because of something he does not have to do? In the end, if there was no such thing as this dude, would the scholar and the woman be able to go on better together if they supported each other, and would it be possible that the scholar would not have been idle for five years? It's unreasonable to criticize the victims so harshly without criticizing the perpetrators.

I have never spent money on reading novels, and neither did this book.

The writing can be very good, the setting style, and the writing are very good. If you just want to read to relieve your boredom, you can read it, but the author really has a lot of personal stuff. Starting from the first chapter of saving people, I won't save them, they have to save themselves. Otherwise, they will still be killed, just a group of cattle and sheep, and then there is the woman in black below. He said that the master said that he was an evil star, and he had to do good. Then the protagonist began to express his own views that were different from ordinary people in long paragraphs, and what the rulers said about good and evil was just what they wanted to control. Is there a possibility that the young man in black is just doing good deeds in his heart? Your private goods are too obvious There are less than ten pictures. If you can bear it, you can continue reading, because the author's descriptions of various settings and behaviors, whether it is birds, people, or bamboos, are all very good, as long as you can bear the private goods

There are so many worries in troubled times. I don't want to change dynasties to loosen up the people. Instead, I run to do some inexplicable things. Maybe the author thinks this is good.