A Weird Game of Wits, Who Dares to Compete with Me?

It's not considered a battle of wits. It all depends on teammates and reversal of support

Just by looking at the title of the book, you should know that the author cannot write about the battle of wits.

The title of the book is not very clever. It is also a battle of wits. The upper limit of intelligence depends on the author. It will only feel embarrassing to brag about a high IQ.

It's a very good novel, but I don't know why there are so many trolls. Those who insist on finding faults with the protagonists and supporting characters with a critical eye to prove that the supporting characters are not well written are simply trying to criticize and win. But this is not a math problem. Don't force the author to find the optimal solution, and don't expect the supporting characters to be extremely smart right from the start. How can the points of such a powerful supporting character be low enough to match that of the protagonist who has just played two or three games? It is not easy to read a book that satisfies your appetite in your spare time. The protagonist's IQ is at least higher than that of ordinary people and he is neither a virgin nor a licker. Now that the author has cut it off, do you want me to read those so-called weird stories in the introduction that "the supporting characters are all orangutans, the protagonist can see the weird patterns at a glance, the protagonist is immune to weird damage, and the two protagonists have big ears and can stun the invincible weird"?

From the title of the book to the introduction, it seems that it is not very smart.

The copy design is interesting, the reasoning is exciting enough, and the author is capable.

Upper pressure😁😁

It's obviously a very good book, but I just need to be more patient. People are so impetuous nowadays that I can't help but complain about the title of the book.