I Can See the Cost of Options

The writing is too stream-of-consciousness, or too pretentious, and the characters don't look like people.

The author is too obsessed with exaggeration, especially the various emotions, actions and costs of the protagonist. In the first book, nearly three-quarters of the content describes what happens to the protagonist and what happens to others, and the plot is slowly and ineffectively promoted. This is a text novel, not a movie or TV series. The information output and reception efficiency is not that high. Readers cannot focus on the desired pictures and filter out the useless parts like watching a movie. High-intensity output of content that has nothing to do with the story will only reduce the smoothness of the story. To be honest, after finishing this book, I have no energy to reason at all. I just watch the protagonist perform a one-man show intoxicatedly. From getting on the bus to perform to arriving at the station, the plot only advances two or three steps. When arriving at the station, the plot is pushed as fast as possible, and the performance is not forgotten even at the end. Please choose, continue to perform or tell stories.

To be honest, I didn't understand it all after reading it. The article was full of riddles, which made me confused.

I hope you all can share your thoughts with me. Thank you very much.

Every reader has a dream to write a book

Is this a newcomer? Born to eat this bowl of rice?

It's so foggy that I can't even understand it when it's over.

The style is obviously different from the others, but I still wish it was a little softer.

His XX construction is a bit tired of aesthetics

The setting idea is actually a bit gripping, you can see the cost behind the choice, and the moral dilemma background has some potential. But the reading experience is too fragmented. The connection between real-life communication, dialogue and consciousness lacks transition and organization. The text is too fragmented (very serious). The key information is in sparse sentences, which requires readers to piece it together by themselves. It makes me confused and confused. -The cost hedging deduced by the protagonist in the waste volume chapter can only be repeated to the conclusion pointed out at the beginning: choice must involve sacrifice, and sacrifice must be made. The strategy collapses, companions die, the situation remains unchanged or gradually deteriorates, and there is almost no actual gain beyond cognition. The whole process is verifying the themes that have been thrown out, and there is a lack of new starting points for outward expansion (the main reason is that the depth of the plot is not enough for outward expansion). The further the plot goes, the easier it is to fall into a cycle of internal friction. That's not to say that you can't write about unsolvable dilemmas, but the fragmented narrative and the depression of not being able to see a way out will make it very tiring to read.

The content of the story is good, but the author's writing style made it very uncomfortable for me to read.

It seems to be well written, but it's really hard to understand.

This book is not suitable for listening to. After listening to it for a long time, you will feel foggy and want to vomit.