The Han Crown Prince

Personally, I think this is correct, but many people with unique insights into history strongly oppose it. Next, I will use a question-and-answer format to demonstrate the correctness of my affirmation of Qin Shi Huang's achievements. 1. Question: The crime of overthrowing the tyrannical Qin Dynasty was a political movement at the end of the Qin Dynasty.

Liu Bang... He had a grand vision. Don't portray him as a rogue or anything like that. Tell us how he treated the Xiang family after his death, how he buried Xiang Yu, and how he treated his meritorious officials. Don't rely on marketing accounts; look at historical facts.

Some people only know Qin Shi Huang but not the legacy of the six generations of emperors; they only know about the unification of the Qin state but not the intention of the Duke of Zhou in establishing the Zhou rites and founding the Chinese nation; they only know about Qin Shi Huang's conquest of the six states but not the tireless efforts of the six wise rulers of the Han Dynasty.

I remember that without my mother Lü Zhi's help and Zhang Liang's advice, Liu Bang would have deposed the crown prince.

The account of Liu Bang kicking a child off his carriage is absurd; not only did he escape by carriage instead of horse, but Xiahou Ying, who possessed either the World or the Star of Platinum, managed to pick up children several times, yet his pursuers couldn't catch him. 😅

I couldn't hold back anymore. Why is the author starting to spout pseudo-historical theories? Even pseudo-scientists don't want this kind of thing.

It's turned into pseudo-historical writing; I can't stand it anymore, so I'm going to delete the book. Sorry. Before deleting the book, I'd like to offer a friendly reminder to the author: I have a slight interest in coin collecting. A large number of Seleucid silver coins have been unearthed in India, as well as other artifacts.

I hate Confucianism the most. It's full of grand theories, but it doesn't offer a single policy for strengthening the country. Besides keeping the people ignorant, it's comparable to Legalism.

In my personal opinion, those who praised Qin during the Chu-Han Contention were utterly idiotic. First, Liu Bang's legitimacy as King of Han stemmed from his campaigns against the tyrannical Qin dynasty, which was essentially a denial of his own regime. The author seems to have attended school, but hasn't studied the Feast at Hongmen or the Biography of Chen She.

Lu Ze can be considered one of the top ten philosophers of the new generation of online temples. He is both an original shareholder and the number one contributor. The hype is outrageous. The Lü family was forced to flee by their enemies. Liu Bang boasted that he would give them 10,000 coins as a congratulatory gift, and he was so happy that he personally went out to greet them.