A Mage’s Journey Begins as a Follower of the Sun God Cult

I think the Sun God Cult is alright, but I don't understand it. Both the synopsis and the novel are very discriminatory. They said during the recruitment process that if you didn't pass, you would die. And if you did pass, you'd get one free treatment. Even someone like the male protagonist, who often goes hungry and may be from a poor, low-class background, is allowed to apply.

A reassuring thesis-style spiritual practice... When I read the previous book, I felt that this self-contained system of spiritual practice would go very well with Western fantasy.

Whether you have a cheat code or not makes no difference.

I feel the world the author created is problematic. A large amount of mathematics must stem from real-world needs. Logically, abundant mathematics and mechanical engineering should lead to extensive social practice and the transformation of social productivity. However, the protagonist's initial living environment resembles a medieval serf society.

I especially love writing about data; it's too complex and makes it easy to get lost in the protagonist's world and profession. This kind of data-driven stuff should be diverse and vibrant. It's better to avoid monologues and map changes, as there are too few supporting characters. Also, a mage's world shouldn't just be about mages.

The sorcerer is just a facade; the book has been renamed "The Art of Leading the CPU," originating from and returning to PUA.

Are you going to build up to chapter 100 before the main character officially becomes a mage? There's been too much buildup. I'm getting tired of writing the foundational stuff.

Well, energy value shouldn't be mana. Mana should be attribute, like solar mana. Since the sun itself is a sun, casting a spell won't harm itself. Similarly, the sun emitting sunlight won't harm the sun itself.

Brothers, according to the faction division of D&D, which faction does the protagonist belong to?

You need to develop a comprehensive system, not just skip over details. It looks rigorous, but it's written around blank spaces, leaving a significant sense of incompleteness. For example, what are its shortcomings? Should we just skip over it? Truly, I listened to your words, and I listened to them wholeheartedly.