The Mastermind: I Rewrote This World

I have been watching behind-the-scenes videos for several years, and I would like to give you an opinion. Each of your stories has too strong a sense of fragmentation. The first ten chapters tell one story, and after ten chapters it immediately jumps to another story, and the story is rarely mentioned again. Then this story is equivalent to a short film. The sense of fragmentation is too strong just by linking one or two characters.

I feel that the introduction is too dissuasive. The supporting characters in the introduction are very disconnected from readers who have not read the book. It is easy to dissuade some people. I suggest you modify it. (If you don't participate in the quarrel, you are right if you say you are right)

To be honest, the author's three golden chapters are very poorly written. The character of the protagonist has not been established at all. He is pretending to be established and then writes about how he cares about human life. However, he was directly included in the first chapter without his consent. If the author wants to make money, he should actually pay attention to the fact that this is writing a novel, not a novel. For real characters, when writing novels, the personality of the characters should be clear, rather than the mixed personalities of people in reality. For example, if you want to write about a good person, you should directly say that he is a good person and keep writing about him as a good person. When writing about a bad person, you should make him completely bad. If you want to write a mixed character, you have to say from the beginning that he is a capricious character, like the protagonist. In fact, at the beginning, he can completely use the model in the book "Reincarnation Paradise" to find dying people to solve all problems. In fact, these days, there is no such thing as the kind of protagonist who always confronts Goldfinger. Don't challenge that kind of writing. That kind of writing is a test of the author's writing skills. However, using the model of "Reincarnation Paradise" will be more effective. It consumes energy points, but it establishes that the protagonist is a person who cares about human life, and if you go to save the woman later, you still have to spend more energy points. The author should focus on writing about what he is good at, rather than trying to write about everything. It is easy to write mixed, you are like the author of Samsara Paradise. The best thing he writes is the fighting scenes and the background setting. He focuses on these two, but in the real world I just mentioned it in one stroke and the protagonist can't fight against Goldfinger, so when writing about Samsara Paradise, I always find people who are already dead, and then ask people. In this way, the paradise does not owe the contractors, and it can be anything. Moreover, its economic system has actually collapsed, but it is written in a vague way, so not many people care, so the author should find the writing method that he is best at, and to be honest, you can Just copy what others say and write it that way. After all, you are constructing stories one by one. It is the same as a contractor performing tasks one by one. You don't necessarily need to use space. You can use things like gods and apostles. Of course, I am not teaching the author to do things. I think the setting of this book is very good, so I say this. After all, I still type so many words. Of course, if you don't care, forget it.

The plot started to decline after A Nightmare on Elm Street, and it got even worse in Japan. I found that the author is still suitable for writing local strange stories. The other inconsistencies are a bit strong.

It's too complicated. Some people say it's like a unit drama. I feel okay about that, but I feel it's more like a pot of hodgepodge. Everything is added to it, including mythology, folk supernatural beings, fairy tales, history, animation, games... There must be some people who don't like some elements in it. It's like a pot of soup that I thought tasted good but vegetables that I didn't like, and I felt that the whole pot had a disgusting smell.

Let's complain about the title of the book. I "re-wrote it" or "I re-edited it." What the hell does "I re-write it" mean? I don't understand the language.

There are only three people in this department? Two of them were specially summoned! Are you kidding me? ? ?

After reading it for so long, I evaluated it and found that it is obviously the best written behind the scenes at Qidian. Although most of the other results are better than the author's and more people read it than the author, it is indeed the best written. Except for the connection between various copies, there is no progress at all. The reason why it is not as good as those books is actually very simple, it is not just pretentious. Good behind-the-scenes writing skills either have a sufficient understanding of folklore and some occult knowledge, or they are constantly pretentious, or their writing is exquisite Obviously this author has no one 😆, the plot writing style is obviously a novice without any depth, and the understanding of mythology is limited to the most common settings in online articles. Because of the author's personality, the protagonist does not like to show off.

I don't know if anyone likes this kind of Madonna protagonist

This kind of corpse fraud usually doesn't last too long. People are exhausted and ideas are broken. It is usually difficult for the author to continue writing. It is estimated that it won't be long before there will be a second eunuch 😰