Yuanyang Taozu

All I can say is that it's too cliche. The protagonist wastes his spiritual root. When he is queuing up to test his spiritual root, he encounters a heavenly spiritual root. After the test, he provokes an enemy. He is also an unofficial disciple of a cultivating sect. Then the person he saves is another heavenly spiritual root. Really, after seeing this, I have no idea of ​​​​going on.

As far as the protagonist's opportunities are concerned, even a pig can become an immortal, and no one has the talent that a great person should have.

How many qi-training shrimps actually came to recover the sacred object? The plot is not rigorous enough,

I'm speechless. During the period of Qi training, there are so many virgins everywhere, and they want all the benefits. It was good to read at first, and it was interesting. They practiced alchemy and the sect was harmonious. But when I got out, I couldn't stop the car. The more I wrote, the more excited I became. During the period of Qi training, I was able to take care of the destruction of the world. The author didn't read it himself.

Writing about morality in poor writing is actually criticizing morality.

Finally found a normal Xianxia book, it's good to read

The head of the Li family, a qi practitioner, is friends with Jin Dan. The writing is messy and off-putting. Doesn't that mean he has only been practicing Jin Dan for more than 100 years?

Our ancient literary giants had outstanding positive qualities and could cultivate immortality, but modern cultivation of immortality is anti-intellectual.

Leave a comment and let me know. What's going on

(◔◡◔)♬︎*(๑ºั╰︎╯︎ºั๑)♡︎(*￣3￣)╭♡❀The little flowers will hit you. .

Does the Tao Te Ching talk about morality?

The author, the classical fairy tales can refer to Xia Dao Jun: Starting from the First Grade of Golden Pill. As someone who has read "Flowers in the Mirror", "Four Travels", "Flowers in the Mirror", "Four Travels", "Four Classics" and "Four Great Classics" to read today's readers, I would like to talk about my current thoughts, "Jiaodian Liu", the panel flow is rotten and will be eliminated sooner or later. Really good works should not be "Jiang Dian Liu". Writing "Jia Dian Liu" can basically only be a cool article. Once you read it, you will forget it. This is a representative copy of the article. The trend of waste materials and the trend of breaking off an engagement are also out of date. Nowadays, when writing books, they either have to be clever or have good writing skills. For example, Guan Guan Gongzi's writing will be bought by daily readers.

The first few chapters were okay, but it got worse towards the end.

Now I know why this book's grades are so poor.

Water is almost the Tao. Goodness nourishes all things. Evil will destroy the world. Good and evil are not Tao. Water, false way! Strength, acting as king, dominating, is called sage, so it is Tao. I only believe in force! People are living lies! Inheritance, inheritance, and continuation are nothing but lies about eternal life. Human civilization has never been great, but it deserves praise and needs to exist, that's all. Good and evil are due to position, good and evil are due to position. If I have enough force,…

Chapter 79 is repeated It was so uncomfortable to read

Not cool, too dry. There are only two points to appreciate in Xiuxian novels. First, the protagonist's genius-style plot is fun and gives readers a visual impact. Second, you can write small plots one by one. This is equivalent to a group portrait, but as long as each small story is written well, there will still be readers. But this book of yours is not that exciting, and the storyline of the second part is dry and has nothing new. I haven't read it at all.

I haven't read it, but I was attracted by the introduction. I would like to ask the author if he has read the Tao Te Ching in its entirety 🌹