The Warlord of the Witcher World

I really don't understand. Are you writing about guns and guns in the magical world? Aren't you just trying to purify readers and make them disgusting? Don't you see how many people have given up reading because of your gun?

The most unreasonable thing about the wizarding world is its attitude towards extraordinary people and the performance of witchers. If we say that the warlocks and witchers in it are all led by nobles and are discriminated against, it is incredible that a few idiots dare to mock people who can kill them at will. There is also the performance of witchers. A lot of people here say that Geralt was stabbed to death with a pitchfork and that witchers can't beat a few soldiers. So the training and transformation of the witcher are all fake. Geralt being stabbed by a pitchfork only shows that the transformation of the witcher is not enough to ignore weapons, and Geralt does not wear heavy armor. The physical fitness of witchers is several times that of ordinary people. With a little training, they can crush ordinary people. It is amazing that the king has not conducted in-depth research on witchers in the world of wizards. They have long lifespans, are resistant to poisons, have strong recovery power, and have good physical fitness. The disadvantage is that they are infertile. If they support research to remove the disadvantage of infertility, then the king can rule for hundreds more years per capita. Isn't that cool?

The previous article is good, but I just saw that the protagonist married a daughter and gave all the weapons and troops to the father-in-law to fight in the war. At this point, the reader should have lost more than half, and the results will not be better later. The father-in-law's family is very powerful. If he wins the battle, the protagonist will have no say. The protagonists have already developed artillery, why are they still marrying each other? We should watch the two sides fighting to see which side is weak and support the other side to make war fortune, strengthen ourselves, and then both sides will suffer losses in the fight, and then they will all be annexed. We should learn from the American imperialism. This is the plot that readers want to see. I withdrew first.

This book definitely takes the hegemony route, which is indeed fine for the original wizard. The sorceress looks awesome and coaxes her, but in fact, as long as the ruler is willing, everyone can be burned on the rack; the demon hunter looks like the sun is rising, but in fact, he cannot hold two pitchforks; the monsters are stragglers and there is nothing to worry about; the Wild Hunt has something, but the fight is nothing more than an army against each other, and any country with strong enough power can fight. But cpdr let himself go in the DLC and created two things that were seriously out of specification—Mirror Master and Shadow Elder. What should we do with these two things?

This is a map of the northern part of the Witcher world made by the University of Warsaw, which is used as one of the main map references in this book.

Sword and Sorcery became . . . Line up to be shot. . Speechless. It has become a historical document

Regardless of whether the other parts are well written or not, I would be put off just by the protagonist getting out the musket. If the fantasy world came up with guns so quickly, wouldn't everyone else be suppressed by technology and die? Demon hunters and mages would also die when surrounded by soldiers with guns. Not to mention that with muskets, machine guns and cannons would definitely appear in the past. Because it is impossible for other lords, nobles, kings and mages to be so stupid and not study guns. The damage power of guns is too abnormal to compare. So logically, the world of witchers will turn into a world of guns. Then what kind of fantasy world is there, unless those kings and mages are forced to turn a blind eye to such a powerful weapon?

Oh my god, the name is a bit low. How about writing the name of the world instead of the warlord of the Witcher world? It's so low.

The name really sounds that way, why not replace the warlord with the emperor?

I've never understood why ordinary people dare to mock witchers. In reality, a two-meter-tall man is in front of you. Do you dare to laugh at him? This is still a society governed by the rule of law.