The Strange World: I Passed the City God Exam

The author's view of good and evil is really open to question. Begin with a discussion of intentionality and unintentionality. That's true. I have never seen the dangerous world. If you have the intention to do good, the purpose is not to do it for good, there must be another purpose. For example, human traffickers open orphanages and so on, using their good deeds to cover up their evil intentions. There are many in society. So there is a sentence. Ancient emperors often said that their hearts can be forgiven and their hearts can be punished. Good and evil still depend on intention. By the way, when I was a child, the teacher praised his classmates for picking up pencils and giving them to the teacher. Later, a student picked up a long pencil, cut it into four sections, and gave it to the teacher four times.

As long as the core of the novel involves good and evil, good and evil, the novel will not go far. Because there are such things as good and evil cause and effect, it can be said that there are thousands of positions and thousands of beliefs, and there will never be a real answer. The novels written in this way must also be inherently flawed. From ancient times to the present, from inside to outside, many wise men and saints can't explain things clearly. I don't believe that an online writer can give a clear definition!

Many novels are set in rural areas. Where will the materials come from to support the cities?

Test City God, that's it? I can do it too

I read a lot of comments, and all of them are about how to punish someone after doing evil and then doing good, or what if it is evil but has good consequences? Why do you have to link the punishment together? Good is good, evil is evil, good and evil do not contradict each other, good is rewarded for good, and evil is punished for evil. If he himself is a bad person but has done good deeds, then he should be punished for the evil he has done, and he will be unselfish. However, he should be rewarded for the good deeds he has done, and he should not only punish the evil but not reward the good just because he is an evil person. If something is evil in itself but produces good consequences, then the evil cause should be punished and the good consequences should be rewarded. There is nothing that needs to be argued against.

There used to be a bad novel called "Start from the City God"

New book sets sail, please recommend and read, thank you

Another one who was suddenly cut off and suddenly wrote a heroine

In the opening chapter on the theory of good and evil, the author is not of that level, and neither are the readers, so don't show any cowardice or conspicuousness.

If you do good deeds intentionally, you will be rewarded little, but if you do evil unintentionally, your karma will be measured based on the results. Doing good without intention should be rewarded; doing evil with intention should be punished.