From Witcher to Lord of the Empire

What has always attracted me is the world full of magic and fantasy adventures. In the game, it is the friendship, love and family ties of the protagonist Geralt, rather than the demon hunter itself. One profession does not mean anything. The key is the unity of knowledge and action.

This book feels like it was unnecessary to write the first eighty or so chapters, and even after writing dozens of chapters, it actually didn't make any major changes to the original plot product. The previous plot can be summarized in one or two chapters to summarize the background of the protagonist. Then just start the plot of the witcher's mutation.

Stone Heart was a bit procrastinated, and waited until he finished writing before bringing it up, because he didn't want to interfere with the writing state with comments. Most people who read this kind of novel want a struggle to control the ups and downs of fate. There is too much ink about a classic branch line, and the sense of struggle is diluted immediately. My personal impression after reading it is not on the same level as the first volume. Maybe it's the author's self-satisfaction for the shortcomings in his heart, which is understandable. Enough said, keep going.

"From Witcher to Lord of the Empire" is a highly imaginative work. The author skillfully combines fantasy and politics, novels and game elements to tell the protagonist's legendary experience of fighting against fate in the wizarding world. The plot in the book has ups and downs, the characters are three-dimensional and vivid, especially the story of the protagonist group is fascinating. At the same time, the author constructs a lifelike different world through rich and detailed descriptions. This book is worth reading, whether you are a fan of fantasy novels or a fan of Witcher games, you will find fun in it. For me, a pure Witcher series gamer who has never read "The Witcher" novels, this book made up for my sense of loss after finishing the game and satisfied part of my fantasy about that fantasy world. Personally, I think the most exciting thing dealt with in this book is the relationship with the Mirror Master. The communication between the superior narrator and his attitude towards low-dimensional creatures are just right.

I enjoyed watching it. Could there be more? I have watched it three times.

，，                                       But how to say, every time I take a look at the book circle after chasing the latest chapter, I will always see many readers quarreling. There are many reasons for the quarrel. I have read most of them and sorted them out. The first thing that comes to mind is why the protagonist wants to be a witcher. How should I put it, because the book is called a witcher? So the main character is a witcher. This is just like the system novel that says there is no need for a system, the harem novel that says there is no need for a heroine, the lily novel that asks the protagonist to get married, and so on. They are all chaotic and happy people who don't know what is said. They are not making comments for the good of the author, but just for the sake of trolling. There are some that are not so radical. One supports the protagonist becoming a witcher but does not support the protagonist's mutation. The other gives reasons why the protagonist has no human rights after becoming a witcher and why he should not be a warlock.                                                                                                                                                                                                             but also the inability to have children after mutation is indeed a disadvantage. The latter is outrageous. The so-called lack of human rights comes from the weak environment of the witchers, and the protagonist's main mission, in addition to restoring the country, is to restore the glory of the witchers and reshuffle the environment. This can be seen from the meeting of the kings in the north. After the protagonist showed the power of the witchers, many kings began to re-examine the power of the witchers. Some book friends put forward views that were completely contrary to what the author wrote. I couldn't understand it. Another reason why the protagonist is not a warlock is because the author does not have that much development time for the protagonist, and the ultimate "villain" Mirror Master is behind it. The protagonist has no choice, and the title is a witcher! The title is The Witcher! The title is The Witcher! Then there is the second big question. The protagonist is a noble. Why should he become a witcher instead of a king? This is outrageous. I don't know how much the book friend who raised this question knows about the national power in the Witcher series. But in the protagonist's country, normally unless the protagonist marries Shirley, he will definitely not be able to become the king before the country is destroyed. Moreover, the main plot of the book is the restoration of the country, the restoration of the country! What should I do if I become a witcher but am discriminated against and not allowed to become a king? Have you read a book? Where does the delusion come from? The country is gone and there is still discrimination. When the country revives, it will be a new feudal regime. How the new feudal regime will be is not up to the protagonist? I don't even know if the readers who ask this kind of question understand the so-called politics or not. What I'm most afraid of is that they don't think about it before saying it even though they don't understand it. And the protagonist is a time traveler and has a wide range of ideas. There are many ways to be a king. If it's traditional, he should be the regent. If it's legitimate and his background suits him, he should marry Xili. If he's strong enough, he can directly conquer the North. I don't know why he can criticize the author on this point. Finally, a few book friends complained that the plot was sometimes too fast and too tight, and there were problems with the connection. I actually didn't understand this paragraph at all at the time. I thought the readers were saying that the author was advancing the plot too quickly. After thinking about it carefully, I realized that it was because I was currently playing the second game of the next-generation version of The Witcher 3. The background story of the Witcher series is very comprehensive, from countries to races to wars to finance to humanities, so many settings are familiar to me. Just like the author writing articles, I skipped over the details that I couldn't see at all without realizing it. But what about book lovers who haven't played the Witcher series for a while? Or are you a book lover who knows the Witcher series through other literary works? This does have these problems for them. I can't refute these book friends just because I don't have these problems now, so I choose to agree with this shortcoming, but this is a problem of the author's writing power. The author can only solve this problem by improving his writing power. Rome was not built in a day. I hope the author can work hard. I don't expect that I can convince other book friends. I just come out and look at the problem from the perspective of a reader, to prevent the author from being influenced by the book club circle. Some book friend novels are so offensive that they are quite speechless after only reading a few pages.

Regarding the debate about the identity of the protagonist of this book, I feel that it is filled with a lot of generalizations, partial generalizations, and selective pretending to be blind, whether it is flattering or negative. As for the noble status of the protagonist, everyone is boasting: member of the royal family, Tianhu starting, heir to the throne, top nobles, there are many choices. But the fact is that Cintra is severely suppressed by the four major countries in the north. It is not considered a top power. There are many with the same power. In the game, the most functional SRs have SSR or UR on top, and the country is about to be destroyed. Is choosing a witcher really a disgrace to yourself? As for warlocks, everyone focuses on Alzu, portals, and research types, but they forget that many of the five managers of the Wizarding Council were stabbed to death with daggers and spears during the coup. In The Witcher 3, warlocks were publicly executed in large numbers, and were chased by the mortal army into street rats and lost dogs. And warlocks can't have children, so being a warlock is easier to accept? Those who belittle witchers say that the people at the bottom look down on witchers, that witchers cannot hit a pitchfork, and that witchers must be crushed to death if they are made by warlocks. But the witcher has killed fewer warlocks? The common people at the bottom reject not demon hunters but all demi-human races including elves and dwarves. Intellectuals and high-ranking people are friendly to demon hunters. Those with some brains in the warlock sect are afraid of demon hunters instead of looking down upon them. I don't know why everyone thinks witchers are so miserable? Do they all think that the average combat power of a witcher is a pitchfork, while the minimum combat power of a warlock is Vigo or Yennefer? Can even a warlock apprentice master a hundred-year-old demon hunter alone? The demon hunters also had a cult period, but they were deliberately smeared and targeted by the warlocks and those in power who were afraid of them, and they became what they are today. Why do I feel that the readers have become the common people in the book, calmly accepted the smeared image of the witchers, and loudly praised the warlocks and nobles?

First of all, the author has worked hard and the reading experience is very good. But there is one thing that makes me a little... Dumbfounded. What is it? It means excessively explaining one's "good deeds" and "good results". We say that when a leader/ruler encounters problems, he must be able to deal with things calmly, be able to weigh the pros and cons, and be brave and resourceful. So, without threatening the "foundation", can this leader/ruler have his own conscience Author, you use the system to "reward" and the behavior to be "self-interested", and establish a so-called rationality behind every good deed Maybe the original intention is good, but in terms of perception, it seems that the protagonist has thought deeply, but what is revealed is a "twisted" feeling (In other words, I have read Chapter 173 so far, and this feeling continues to this day) Here, borrowing a popular meme some time ago, called "the pattern opens" The protagonist is a leader, that is, the supreme leader of the people! This is his position and his class! Just showing one's strong strength in front of the masses at the right time is not called a leader, that is called a manor owner. Similarly, many views in Xiaomin's thoughts are not applicable to the protagonist (Xiaomin's thought does not mean in a derogatory sense, because I am also an ordinary citizen. It refers specifically to the protagonists of different classes. If you want to wear the crown, you must bear the weight.) The leader must have a variety of extraordinary spiritual qualities, including tenacity, bravery, honesty, kindness, and even coldness, etc. But in the current "wrong" state, it can be said that the protagonist's spiritual shaping is still lacking. I also hope that the author can go further and make the protagonist more and more perfect. (ps: There is a saying in Lannister saying: Lannister must pay its debts)

To be honest, it is unlikely that a witcher will become the emperor. First of all, there is a lot of pressure from public opinion in the north. Secondly, witchers are sterile and have a long lifespan, which may lead to unrest among their subordinates (after all, no one wants an eternal emperor, and having no heir is a huge damage to the inheritance of the legal system, and the bloodline is extinct). And since there are system panels and general skills that can be developed as warlocks. After all, in the game, spells can regenerate limbs and open portals. To be honest, witchers are super soldiers made by mages.

Everyone says they don't want the protagonist to become a witcher, but when you control Geralt, don't you yearn for the life of a witcher? When you enter Red Dead Redemption, don't you want to be as lawless and fearless as Arthur? I still hope that the author will write according to his own outline. Recommended monthly tickets will be greatly beneficial.

Do you think you are part of the ruling class and look down on witchers because you are a noble? Let's not talk about whether the witcher is strong or not. The life span of the witcher is long enough for many people to go crazy for it. And you are a modern thinker and are not a local aboriginal. How do you get so much sense of aristocratic superiority?

Why is the heroine not the three sisters in the forest😭

Here are some pictures for you

I think the strong point of the witcher is that he can both use magic seals and have a strong body. He is a dual practitioner of magic and martial arts. However, the magic of the original witcher is really weak, and the physical strength is only that much (after all, he can be killed by a pitchfork...). If the author can strengthen the type and intensity of the witcher's magic, as well as physical defense (just strengthening the protagonist), it would still be very impressive.

Another way to explain the demon hunter is actually much more high-end: The world's greatest mage and his master led a team of top warlocks in the world and worked hard to develop a human enhancement and transformation project. No one has been able to crack it so far, and many forces are plotting. Doesn't this sound much more high-end? I think the horizontal comparison is between Alice in Resident Evil and Captain America Plus in Marvel. I have seen many people say that it was made by a warlock, and it always reminds people of gargoyles and slimes. It is very low, okay? It is undeniable that demon hunters were very strong in the context of that time. In the war-torn Middle Ages, doesn't being able to roam the continent single-handedly and kill demons not show your strength? It's just that the back of the Demon Hunter was divided, and it lacked cohesion and became a mess. If it were during the Demon Hunter Order, it would be a force that no force could ignore. And the witcher itself has a minimum guarantee. The author's exclusive plug-in for witchers can increase the upper limit. What does it have to do with my protagonist if the upper limits of other witchers are low? If the protagonist becomes a warlock and cannot enable plug-ins, then he might as well become a witcher. Warlocks are also good and bad. Some of them died from the pain of soldiers who did not resist. Nilfgaard and the witch-hunting cult killed few warlocks. Members of the Supreme Council of Warlocks were hiding. As for the fertility problem, hasn't the author explained it and given at least three solutions? Why do you still pretend not to hear it?

The comment section thinks that it is not feasible for the protagonist, a noble, to become a demon hunter, as it will affect fertility, but doesn't the protagonist have a system? Moreover, we have only written a few chapters, and the system's functions have not yet been fully demonstrated. Can't we use the system to eliminate the drawbacks of the witcher? And some people say why they shouldn't choose other professions. I think compared to other professions, the demon hunter is the most detailed and comprehensive profession that the protagonist understands. Instead of looking for other unknown powers, it is better to find one that you are familiar with and understand.

Northern Kingdom, Nilfgaard, Skellige Islands House, Witcher World Map, Toussaint Map, Game Map, Redania Map, Temeria Region Map,

In the wizarding worldview, nobles become witchers. One is the ruling class, the other is at the bottom of the chain of contempt. How can these two get together? ? Another outrageous comment, as long as it describes the imperfect and incomplete feeling of "making a choice between an evil outcome and a relatively less evil outcome", it will be an excellent Witcher 3 fanfic.

Personally, I think the start is too high. If you start as a beggar or a slave, everyone would like the protagonist to quickly become a witcher to have power, be able to do things without protection 🤫, and have a long lifespan. The start is directly at the prince level, and it also comes with its own system. Considering the flaws of the witcher, naturally a large number of people will find it inappropriate. It's not that the witcher is bad, it's that the start is too high. Without a system, it's okay for strength, with a system... The status is still high... Just traveling with you to another world is a prince with no skills. If you don't practice the Nine Yin Manual well, go to practice the Chunyang Tongzi Kung Fu, or join the Jianghu sect and go to the Huashan sect. You should be proud of the world. From my personal point of view, you are right. Don't scold others. I am just sharing my subjective opinion. The book is still very interesting.

The most promising witcher school is the Griffin School. The magic brought by meditation and knowledge has allowed them to even give birth to dragon-slaying warriors like George. (The Chopper Team is discriminated against everywhere...) The protagonist is a knight, so it would be good to become a hunter of the Griffin School. However, I would like to ask how the protagonist plans to save the group of demon hunters (after all, he is now a member of this group) I would recommend an organizational system like Monster Hunter, setting up a stronghold guild, and then establishing a logistics system. Several demon hunters are responsible for each area. The target is small and can be flexibly adapted.

In the wizarding world, people believe that witchers are sterile. Preconceived notions are difficult to change. People believe that a king who is infertile has an heir. The question is, how do you prove that the child is yours? After all, the cognitive basis of the masses is here. Doesn't this give people an excellent reason to rebel?

Let me show you some pictures 3

Let me ask a question, how come the protagonist has become so slightly stronger after using so many legendary monster items to become a demon hunter?

Sorry, I didn't expect that I would write a second long review for this book. I will try to be as simple as possible this time. The plot of this book is the story of the protagonist becoming a demon hunter and taking risks with his friends to eventually restore the country. If you want to see the tragic story of the witcher in the original work, where everyone shouts and fights and basically has no happy ending, please read the original work directly or play the new Chinese dubbed version of The Witcher: The Third Generation. The author writes a story in which the protagonist actively seeks racial equality in a feudal society, changes the tragic plot of the original work, and establishes a country with a new order. This story is a great read! I want to see the kind of movie where the protagonist fights with people every day and gets stabbed in the back, get out of here! The reason why I wrote another long review is because of this book friend. I don't know if this book friend has read this book, or if he really understands the Witcher series. He even used talking monkeys as a metaphor for witchers in modern society? I just want to ask what is the difference between normal humans in the wizard setting and normal humans in our modern society? If a demon hunter is put into modern society, he is a genetically modified person. It is understandable that a genetically modified person is a lunatic from the cat school and cannot be president. Why can't a genetically modified person with normal thinking do the same? There are even many literary works in which intelligent machines can become presidents. It's obvious that this reader is just refuting for the sake of refuting, and even the most basic metaphors are used incorrectly. I also think he is outrageous. Then there is the very funny discrimination problem among witchers. The most important plot line of the protagonist is to solve the discrimination problem, and it is not only the discrimination among witchers, but also the discrimination between races. What this reader means is that the author should change all the chapters about this aspect by now. According to him, to let the protagonist accept the problem of discrimination against witchers, then the author can just delete the book and leave less than forty chapters. I don't know if you think it is funny or not, I think it is quite funny. In the article, the protagonist is trying to find a way to solve the problem of genetic mutation of the witcher. These readers who have not seen it think that the protagonist will definitely not be able to solve it, so it is better to accept the tragic fate of the witcher. What is the difference between what the protagonist does and those scientists in the science fiction world who develop potions that stabilize genetic mutations for superpowers? Since the witcher was born from scientific research and development, why can't the protagonist advance downwards? Why did he brazenly say in the comment section, "The protagonist cannot become a king if he becomes a witcher? This violates the setting of the wizarding world" and robbed the author of his pen? In the wizarding world, even a group of ordinary people who worship flames with magic-blocking gold can control a city and hunt down all "heresies". Do these readers think that the protagonist who can safely mass-produce demon hunters cannot control a country? Can't control public opinion? This country has been re-established from top to bottom. Do we still think of it as "our Qing Dynasty" like these book friends, but "our old wizarding world country"? It's really ridiculous. After reading only a few chapters of the book, I almost wrote more words than the author.

Why are so many people obsessed with the fact that the protagonist loses the ability to have children after becoming a witcher? ? You can tell from the introduction that the protagonist is bound to unify the continent. The protagonist has hundreds of years of life as a demon hunter. Hundreds of years, is this the reincarnation of dozens of generations? It is completely enough for the protagonist to implement education reform and cultural reform Since the aristocratic enfeoffment system is not working, then change the system, such as a republic and an electoral system, there are many ways to choose a talented person to inherit the protagonist's country. In addition, the protagonist will become the co-owner of the world and the most powerful person in the world. He can operate it however he wants. Besides, even if the country that the protagonist conquered fell apart immediately after the protagonist's death, so what? After the death of Qin II, don't future generations still remember Qin Shihuang to this day? And even if the protagonist has children and heirs, will it be guaranteed that the protagonist's empire will not perish in his lifetime like "Qin"? ? What's there to worry about? After I die, don't worry about the floods.

The current AI protagonist is so graphic

To be honest, when I saw the title and synopsis of the book, I initially thought that the protagonist climbed up from the bottom step by step. I didn't expect to start off so rich, so I can understand why there are so many fierce objections in the comments. However, this book is really well written, and the protagonist is also my favorite type. I hope it can be maintained after it is released. Also, don't write the adult Ciri as a love-minded vase who is attached to the male protagonist. The two of them can be annoying and spoil the dog, but Ciri must maintain her independence.

I have been saving up for a long time and haven't read it for almost half a year. It is still as good as before. It may be the only novel that I want to read a second time, especially the return of the king to save Xintra. That part is well foreshadowed and the climax is also very exciting.

I hope everyone can join the group discussion and provide suggestions to the author if they have good ideas or bad ideas (mainly logical, don't take the setting too seriously, it's difficult for everyone to agree on one person's ideas). It is rare for an author with excellent writing skills to write a witcher fanfic. Let us jointly cherish this book. The author is a tool to fulfill our wishes. Let us work together to make this wizarding world more colorful, let the meaning in our game have a complete meaning, let the black and white reinterpret what it should be, let the poor children in the game live a happy life, and let those incomplete families be happy. Let the Wild Hunt be extinct, let Duny the Hedgehog (Emhyr) die for me, let Little Baldy die for me, let Viagra die for me. . . The group account is in the novel introduction, let us meet in this new wizarding world! Add automatic if you like it, don't let it go to your head.

Rather than the adventure-fighting monster-hunting storyline, I would rather watch the protagonist fight for hegemony in the wizarding world and establish a unified empire. After all, I have read a lot of witcher-style protagonists and played the game many times. I am a bit tired of the aesthetics, and it is difficult to write new ideas in the plot. However, there are no novels about fighting for hegemony in the wizarding world, at least I have not read it. Through the improved version of the system's witcher potion, you can establish a witcher army to defeat the monsters, unify the world, and engage in cross-dimensional wars. It's exciting to think about it.