This Director Only Makes Bad Movies

The humor and satire in it are so insightful. Did the author watch too many bad movies to satirize the entertainment industry? 😁The audience doesn't understand appreciation, it's not plagiarism, it's just borrowing →_→ It's so flavorful!

It was okay at first, but later on it was just a bad movie on purpose. The audience is not stupid, no matter how much marketing is done, will they still be fooled again and again? It is not ruled out that there are people who like this type, but they are only a minority after all. If you don't have money to make a bad movie, there's nothing you can do about it. If you can still operate normally later, you still do this. To put it nicely, it's just to make money. Who will care about you if you ruin your popularity with the audience.

To be honest, the front is very creative, but in the back, a Chinese captain is sent, who obviously has money and funds, and a heroine with a profound background, but it is still made into a super bad movie to deceive people. To be honest, if you deceive a top-notch white and rich beauty like this, in reality, you will not be blocked until you are put in a sack.

It's a pretty good urban entertainment article, much better than the cookie-cutter celebrity articles on the current assembly line. It doesn't feel like there's anything funny about it, but it makes you laugh so happily. With more than 40 photos, I can laugh for more than half a point. My evaluation is that the grass jelly is unique.

It was so funny that I screamed with laughter, but there was one thing that made me feel awkward. The protagonist obviously wanted to open up the heroic universe, and he also had the funds, so why didn't he want to make Captain China better? Only by doing better can you start other hero series. You want to imitate the foreign way of making bad movies, but at least they make it look like the real thing. But you really can't justify it. It's funny, but there is no sense of expectation to continue reading. I suggest you change it a little. Before everyone gets tired of it, if you don't change, the performance of this book will really come to an end.

The author should arrange two parts. I go to a bad movie and a blockbuster movie. If it is still like this in the later stage, it will be easy for aesthetic fatigue. If you make a big bad movie later, it will be like a matryoshka doll and no one can guess it.

This is the best urban novel of 2022. The content is original, the angle is novel, fascinating, profound, and humorous, making it stand out.

The previous part of this book was really a masterpiece, but it failed starting from Captain China, because the logic is not good. From the reader's point of view, if you can make good movies, why would you only make bad ones? In the first two movies, you were willing to make bad movies for money. Later, Lin Hongyou supported you so much. Is it appropriate to make a bad movie to deceive others? Why make bad movies when you can just make money from good movies and rely on publicity and marketing to defraud the audience? You can deceive in any industry, but you can't continue to deceive. Mainstream movies are mainstream, and bad movies are just bad movies.

This book is like what the main character does. The early stage of thinking is very good and can be seen. It won't work in the third part. Rotten for the sake of being rotten. Alas. I started watching the third one without skipping a beat, but by the time I got to Spider-Man, I was too lazy to watch it. To be honest, the third movie of the protagonist is a big turning point and particularly challenges readers. I couldn't resist and withdrew!!

I know that the theme of the novel is to make a bad movie. The protagonist can make a bad movie for money, but deliberately making a bad movie = low cost. It is really poisonous to ignore others' investment of tens of millions and only spend one million to make a bad movie, and to deceive others into fools.