Start by Building an Extraordinary Civilization

In my rebirth, I am very good at playing ants.

2023*1*4 The author updated Chapter 22. Let me write some thoughts after reading it. The beginning is very realistic. The mysterious fog monster. Ordinary people dare not go out without gas, electricity or water. Catching rainwater and eating raw rice alive has the feeling of survival. The author describes the meridians and consciousness of the human body well. The author gave it to the vitality of consciousness. The idea is very good. The consciousness energy invades the body of the ant to obtain the information (including genes, etc.) Of the consciousness meridians of the ant's body. The writing is very touching. This book made me very (obsessed) with reading it. It is not like some books that I don't feel immediately after reading the beginning. The content is hollow and uncreative. The writing style is written in a flowing style and I can think of the ending after reading the beginning.

The reason your book is not good is because humans on Earth have too high a priority. It's useless for you to create a blue star. Do you understand that all living beings are equal, except for the protagonist?

Regardless of priority, the crisis in the real world has not been over yet, but it has been focused on the world of ants. If a stronger monster comes in the real world, the protagonist will be K0!

One update a day is really too slow. The author's imagination is okay. If the author maintains this quality, there shouldn't be much of a problem in increasing the amount of updates and the cost.

It was pretty good at the beginning, but it became a bit boring once I got to know the ants. The length given was too long, which resulted in the protagonist having no sense of existence at all, and it became quite boring.

The one about Ant is too classic, a classic failure. Now everyone knows that this is unreasonable, but you still write

Can the author see it? There is always a big problem in this kind of creation literature, time and space For example, your concept of time, even if their thinking is accelerated dozens of times, is equivalent to a month's lifespan while floating. Your time scale is equivalent to decades, at least more than ten years, which is equivalent to day by day, as if every 24 seconds passes, it is 24 hours a day. You have to understand that this is one second under normal thinking, even if it is an insect's thinking, but it cannot be used as an hour. This is not accelerated thinking I checked the normal size of the floating space. Even if it is one centimeter to two centimeters long, the actual longest one is 27 millimeters. So according to their concept, one centimeter is equal to one meter. The size of your living room is at most ten meters long and wide, which is equivalent to one kilometer. A so-called ten-meter-long flower is actually only about 20 centimeters at most, which is just tens of meters high. Even if it is 100 square meters, that is 1 million square meters, each square can hold 25 people. Since it can already stand, its length is not counted. That means the entire living room is filled with floating humans, which is estimated to be only tens of millions. But if you send out an army, it will cost tens of millions. Serious problems have been discovered before with ants. The concepts of time and space are becoming more and more serious. If you say that you can reduce their size by 100 times, it will be different.

Can the world not always be related to the earth, and stop messing with the Holy Mother?

Actually, I think a large part of the reason why your book is so bad is because you talk to yourself too much. You always say um, uh, but you can't change it. You write too much.

Congratulations on the launch

I just see that you are talking nonsense, explaining concepts and conjectures, what is there to explain? Isn't it okay if the protagonist does this and that happens? Where is the consciousness of the Wei Jiangwei Meridian World raised? After talking for a long time, the protagonist's conjecture becomes a fact. How about you write a wizard novel?

At first glance, I thought it was about the protagonist creating magic in the apocalypse, leading the survivors on a supernatural path, and fighting all the way to the Mafia's hometown, but it turned out to be boring.

The first dozen or so chapters are quite interesting. The protagonist travels through time and discovers a space of consciousness that has not yet been fully integrated with the body. He directly trains the vitality of consciousness. It was originally good, and the setting is also novel. Then he continued to dig deeper with the idea of ​​​​consciousness, and added the apocalyptic environment, and combined it with faith. In this way, consciousness combined with faith, coupled with the world of memory, wouldn't it be better to have a practice of pretending to become reality, but ended up playing with ants and insects, and fell into the cliche. Nowadays, we don't just look at the catalog to guess the development. We can just look at the volume names (such as Qi Training Era) and roughly guess what is going to be written. I originally thought it was an interesting new book, and it was definitely a studio article.

When will the author be able to write only this book? This book feels much better than the books you wrote before. It has made great progress. It can be read and written, and the logic is okay.

It was interesting at first, but then I didn't really like the alternative creation stream.

I haven't written too much yet. You can declare that after a certain number of chapters, you won't be muttering to yourself like uh-huh. Stop the loss in time.

The setting is okay, but the plot logic has some minor flaws. For example, once the protagonist obtains the genetic information about the power of the ant colony, his power will be doubled. According to the setting, the protagonist must at least assimilate his arm. If not, the protagonist should have collapsed or become inhumane due to information conflict.

Why does the author have to think about human evolution and civilization? I can think of life in the small world too.

One by one

Author, I can understand why you fight so hard. After all, in the farming creation style, it's not about how good those little ants fight. But can you stop saying "It's just that, it's just that"? It will have no effect at all if you remove it. Also, oral habits such as "um" and "uh" in the writing are also very unpopular.

The author is still creating the world. In fact, if you don't add apocalyptic texts, you're actually pretty good. But if you focus on apocalyptic writing and don't distinguish between priorities, it will become very poor. Either change the title of the book, or prioritize it.

Why not call it my small apocalyptic world and create a god?

I hope the author's book will do well. If it does well, I suggest that it be longer, okay?

You don't write about the protagonist? There is no point in writing about the world in a bottle. . .

I read Chapter 83, and I'm still in Ant Mayfly. I feel bored. I don't know what the outside world is like and whether anyone has survived.

There is no main plot in the back of this novel, it's all just a show to make money.

The introduction tells about two books, one with the main character playing a single-player game, and the other with humanity surviving natural disasters and developing through self-improvement.

You can use less exclamation points when the characters are talking. It can be seen that the author's writing style is still good, but too many exclamation points make me feel like I am reading a white novel.

I almost fell in when I looked at it. Thinking that I have the ability of the protagonist scares me to death when I react.