The Palace Fairies Are Irresistible

I saw Chapter 79, Death from Poison. The previous writing was very creative and had many highlights. However, the author is not very good at telling stories and there are no main conflicts. So the author kept making trouble around the little widow Feng Niang. Today, she was attracted by the second generation of the general's family. After harassing the little widow, the protagonist ran to take revenge. He beat the young and the old. After many twists and turns, he attracted the mastermind behind the scenes and destroyed the general's family. A few days later, the second generation of the prince's family fell in love with the widow, and there was another wave of help to solve the problem. The villains were punished, and the younger ones were probably beaten later, and the old ones killed the prince's family. I wonder, have you ever seen a woman at this level of power? ? ? Or how useless is a female widow who fled to the capital from the countryside? ? ? Logic aside, this kind of routine only has to be used once. It's really meaningless to use it all the time.

Is the protagonist too arrogant? Everyone worships him for being undefeated, and if he finds some excuses, he will be beaten to death, right?

Brother, this is a feudal dynasty. How do you think of making Pig Knuckle an arrogant fool who is not afraid of anyone? He would have died eight hundred times if he talked to his superiors like that. . .

When will the harem be greened? 😄

Follow me and learn how to build a fairy garden in the human world. Greening has already started

The protagonist has no brains, and the 20 pictures are extremely poisonous. It's just a small character. In just one sentence, that Taoist Wang can kill the protagonist. I don't even know what world I am in, and the human life in it is not valuable at all. I have written about it before, but I am putting poison here again. I really don't understand what the author is thinking. Isn't this a denial of himself? Inconsistency.

Why are fortune-telling always attributed to Confucian scholars? Confucian scholars who advocated the Book of Changes did not say that Confucius and Mencius knew fortune-telling. There are no history books that say that Confucius and Mencius knew fortune-telling. Confucius mentioned the Book of Changes because it is said to have been written by King Wen of Zhou Dynasty. Divination and hexagram theory are all metaphysics and the theory of ghosts and gods. Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism are the three schools of thought. Confucius, a Confucianist, said that if the child is silent, the strange power will confuse the spirit. Buddha cultivates the afterlife, not this life. It's only related to Taoism, so how can you say that Taoists can't tell fortunes? Taoism also highly esteems Zhouyi. Moreover, Taoism is different from Taoism. It's not just Lao Tzu's thoughts. So fortune-telling by Confucian scholars is simply ridiculous.

Please change your profile and stop tricking honest people into learning fortune telling.

There is a saying that I am not happy to say. As we all know, there are no children in the palace, there are only young eunuchs who have just been cleansed, hahaha.

What can I say? The plot with Taoist Wang is a bit inexplicable. The protagonist is too arrogant. He is just a consumable who burns corpses. Why would he dare to confront a big boss who can kill n monsters with one palm and question others with a grin on his face when his own strength is very low? Isn't this looking for death?