My Artillery Has a 3,000-Meter Caliber

The increased caliber is ridiculously overpowered, but the rate of fire, barrel size, and ammunition capacity are utterly terrible! Keep in mind that the average caliber of battleships in World War II was only 406 mm, with the largest Yamato being only 460 mm, and the range was generally around 35 to 45 km. But the protagonist's gun is 110 cm, which is 1100 mm!

The skill description is to break through physical limitations and create any weapon in one's mind. Does that mean one can create sci-fi weapons like water droplets and two-dimensional foils? Wouldn't that make one invincible? It's not necessary to pursue caliber.

I recently came across some interesting pictures.

I was wondering why there was no update last night. So I was invited to do a live stream. I'm speechless. I'm refusing to participate in these kinds of events next time. 🙅🙅🙅

Isn't the concept of "all races" here a bit too low-level? Almost all of them use the human race template with no racial differences at all. The so-called "war of all races" is not even as good as World War II on Earth. For example, the Mech race can create mechanical life forms similar to Transformers, or Mech Masters can use their mental power to create metal floating cannons that fly around…

We are collecting ideas for props. The format is as follows. [Item Name]: xx [Item Level]: xx [Item Details]: General description of appearance [Item Effect]: xx And to collect individual talents of the human race [Talent Name]: xx [Talent Effect]: xx

In my personal opinion, the author's style is pretty cool, it's incredibly enjoyable to read, and the updates are ridiculously frequent and plentiful, like eating a whole pack of chewing gum – once you start reading, you can't stop. The downside is that it only performs well in the early stages; it often falters and falls apart in the later stages, making it prone to being abandoned in the end.

I hate it when authors drag out stories that should end but then stop updating altogether. I'm not planning to read the new book.

Occasionally adding a bit of personal "philosophy of life" is one thing—whether it's awkward or not, at least it's harmless. But when the author can only describe perversion in detail and treat it as gospel, then the book has reached its garbage time. By the way, if blasphemy could earn faith equal to or greater than devout devotion, then what's the point of having believers? This is a serious logical flaw.

This author must have written the book using voice input; the misuse of punctuation and awkward sentence breaks makes it inexplicably uncomfortable to read.