Becoming an Occultist by Playing Sherlock Holmes

From my perspective as a reader, in the name of Sherlock Holmes, it does not focus on the detective details, and chooses to downplay the detective details, but it is not too much to emphasize fantasy, and it feels like it is leaning towards fantasy. If you, the author, are serious about writing, you can consider two lines, reality completion, fantasy independence, dependence on clues, and fantasy and weirdness of clues. As long as it is interesting, readers are not recommended to refer to (learn from) themes such as Sherlock Holmes. It is not difficult to be interesting, such as clues that can fly, become human, become objects, become beasts, fight, or transcend time and cross space

The protagonist is Sherlock Holmes. He should be given the ability to play with his IQ. It's so simple and crude to die directly from the magic eye. Isn't that bad?

I hope to reproduce this😁 Holmes and Watson are camping in the wild. Late at night, Holmes woke up and nudged Watson with his elbow. "Watson," said Holmes, "look at the sky and tell me what you see." Watson replied: "I saw millions of stars, Holmes." "So Watson, what conclusion did you draw from this?" Watson thought for a moment and replied: "Well, from an astronomical point of view, what I see tells me that there are millions of galaxies in the universe, and there may be billions of planets. From astrology Geometry-wise, I see Jupiter in Leo. Chronologically, I guess it's about a quarter past three in the morning. Meteorologically, I guess it's going to be a sunny day. Theologically, I think God is omnipotent, and we're so small and humble. Well, what did the sky tell you, Holmes?" "Idiot, our tent was stolen!"

Na Na

In fact, you can change the name. Many readers came here for the name Sherlock Holmes. The greater the expectations, the greater the disappointment. It is easy to fail in word of mouth and lose readers.

Brother, they have been brothers for so many years and you gave them peanuts to make them into women. Woj, you don't think that people who haven't read Sherlock Holmes will read your book, do you?

What can I say, I feel like the rhythm is not clear enough. The protagonist's abilities are not matched well. If you ask me to say that since it is Sherlock Holmes, you can either go the detective route with high IQ to the end, or you can go the contrast route without enough IQ and muscle to make up for it, and just violently push him away. For example: in the book, the characters come to Sherlock Holmes to solve the case, and they all think that he is a great detective. However, the protagonist hits the head of the villain with a stick, which I think is quite interesting. Of course, it depends on the author's description. After all, I am not a professional. I just feel that this subject matter will be more interesting and better than the current description.

The protagonist behaves like a dog when he sees a woman who is a little bit more aggressive. He looks like Sherlock Holmes. It's hilarious.

The author dares to write that Holmes himself is a man of great courage and perseverance...

Why is there no cp? Even if there is no cp, the peanut is written as a female. That's even worse.