Apocalypse Research Handbook

Not bad, it reminds me of the post-apocalyptic novels I used to read (these days are all garbage, all they do is build shelters). While the old methods were all formulaic, they were still better than the one-click triple upgrade of the Vault system. Even a zombie apocalypse is more enjoyable than a shelter. Staying in a shelter all day isn't like you're never going out.

It's written quite like a post-apocalyptic story, reminiscent of a classic post-apocalyptic novel, *Apocalypse Cockroaches*. These days, post-apocalyptic novels are so cringeworthy; they're all about systems and chat channels, just endless bragging and joking. They don't feel like an apocalypse at all; they're more like playing an online game. Where's the anarchy, the brutal reality of humanity's survival of the fittest?

"The Barefoot Doctor's Handbook," "A Friend to Dual-Use Military and Civilian Personnel," "Militia Training Handbook," and "Extremely Powerful and Practical - Unrestricted Combat Techniques!" Simple, practical, high-quality, and collectible—highly recommended!

What the hell is "the end of science is theology"? Science has an end? Author, if you don't revise this synopsis, it'll really deter a lot of people. 😅

To be honest, you should revise the synopsis. The phrase "the end of science is theology" sounds too pseudo-scientific and is not suitable for the synopsis. It's off-putting. Even if you really want to create a novel world that fits this statement, you should put it in the article. Putting it directly in the synopsis means that you're not introducing anything, and it just makes people think you're a pseudo-scientist.

Well, the book is well-written, but it's just not interesting to read; it's kind of a gimmick.

I've read over thirty chapters, so what can I say? It's a bit of a shame, the title and content are quite different. I initially thought the protagonist would go further and further down the research path, but it seems that he has now taken the path of physical domination, and research has become nothing more than a means to advance the plot.

First of all, I gave the author a monthly pass, and I hope the author can read my post and the comments within it. My words might be a bit harsh, but I don't mean any harm. If you don't like my opinion, I hope you can also read the comments in bold at the end. Here are my thoughts after reading chapters 68 and 69. I feel Zheng Hao is better suited to acting alone.

The end of science is theology (X) Science has no end. (√)

Science is not a religion; it is the law governing how this world works. The microscopic particle composition of this world is a description of the world, derived from countless experiments and summaries! It is a completely objective existence; whether you have discovered it or not, it has always been there and has never been changed... Science has no end!