
What Golden Age?
哪有什么康乾盛世
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 2.4M Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Qing & Republican Era
- Updated
- 1mo ago
- Source
- Qidian
Synopsis
737Chapters
4Votes
24.9kRecs
81.4kFans
More by this author
Readers also read
I Was About to Rebel When Li Shimin Put on a Yellow Robe for Me
Traveling Through Cao Zhang: Beginning with Jie Hu Zhenmi and Seizing the Direct Descendants
Dawn of Chongzhen 1627
When I Was in the Red Mansion, I Saw Lu Zhishen Uprooting a Weeping Willow Tree.
Department of Abnormal Pathology
I Am the Great Powers
The Fall of the Qing
On Qingming, It's a Good Day to Die
A Legendary Farmer in America
Great Ming: Moral Blackmail? I, Chongzhen, Have No Morals!
I Became Emperor in Africa
Late Ming: I Pose as a Descendant of the Jianwen Emperor
The Kangxi-Qianlong Golden Age Is as Good as Mine!
Wu Zhou
Reader comments 42
Translated by Google Translate
The most rubbish feudal dynasty in history
Manchu Qing really meant that after losing Britain and France, they lost to Tsarist Russia, after losing Tsarist Russia, they lost to Japan, after losing Japan, they lost to Burma, and after losing Burma, even TM Nepal could sign unequal treaties. This is what the Qing fans forcefully explained. It would be similar to other dynasties. I think even the Southern Song Dynasty and the Eastern Jin Dynasty would not be inferior to Nepal
Revolting against the Qing Dynasty and restoring the Ming Dynasty is not as good as the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom
One thing to say is that Qianlong probably never ceded territory and paid compensation. Although the Qing Dynasty had original sin, they must not rebel against the Qing Dynasty and restore the Ming Dynasty. The rubbish Ming Dynasty was not as good as the Manchu Qing Dynasty.
It doesn't matter what the Manchus want, only oppression
It was written in a hazy way. Since I wrote about Goldfinger, I should use the effect of Goldfinger. When I saw someone saying that historical articles should not be written about Goldfinger authors, did I get dizzy? Have you started to reduce the presence of Goldfinger? It's hard to please both of you, it's no wonder that you can get good grades like this!
I just want to ask
For those who belittle Zhu Yuanzhang, I just want to ask, did you get back the Sixteen Prefectures of Yanyun that had been lost for 430 years without Zhu Yuanzhang? Did you get back the Hexi Corridor that was lost for 600 years? Did you get back Yunnan, which was lost for 800 years? You must say that if there is no Zhu Yuanzhang, there must be Li Yuanzhang and Wang Yuanzhang. Then I want to ask, where was Zhu Yuanzhang when Wuhu was in chaos? Where was Zhu Yuanzhang during the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties? Where is Zhu Yuanzhang in the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms? It took a lot of effort to create a Song Dynasty, but has he unified it? In the 600 years since the split at the end of the Tang Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang has finally emerged to unify China and unite the north and the south. Not to mention Lao Zhu's later immigration to the border and the restoration of traditional Chinese culture. Is it appropriate for you to say that Zhu Yuanzhang has no credit?
Anti-Qing and anti-Japanese must be supported!
The Ming Dynasty gave up on Vietnam since the heyday of Renxuan, and then gave up all the areas such as Three Annals and Six Weis, Duoyan and Three Guards, the Hetao area, the Uszang area, Nurgandusi and other areas. In the Qing Dynasty, they had to be beaten before being willing to cut off a little bit of flesh. In the Ming Dynasty, there was no need to beat them at all, and they gave up faster than anyone else. The founding of the country was almost the same. When it fell, the Ming Dynasty had more than 3 million square kilometers of land left, and the Qing Dynasty had more than 13 million square kilometers of land.
Clear the map of Hunan and Hubei for reference only
Hai Rui can survive by scolding Jiajing. Try scolding Kangxi in the Qing Dynasty. Except for Yongzheng, no one in the Qing Dynasty thought of themselves as emperors. They all thought of themselves as slave owners. The Ming Dynasty deserved to perish since the beginning of the three rates. However, the Qing Dynasty did not abolish the three rates after its demise. They thought that changing their names would deceive them. The class oppression and ethnic conflicts in the Qing Dynasty were greater than those in the Ming Dynasty. As for those land-ceding and indemnity treaties, it was not the bannermen who paid for it, but the people suffered. You can look at the Monument to the People's Heroes about the nature of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. Anyway, there are many people in Europe, America and Japan who miss the Qing Dynasty, but there is really no one who misses the Ming Dynasty.
Either write about goldfinger cheating and directly abuse the Qing Dynasty, or write an anti-Qing Dynasty article based on historical facts without any subjective consciousness. It must be necessary but also reveal a petty spirit, just like the bitch's chirping "I am not blackmailing them, what happened to them?" Historical articles should be more grand, and not chronological articles written by family members.