The Movie World's Villain Strikes Back

How to say it? The subject matter is good and the author also has ideas! I didn't copy the original plot, I wanted to write my own story. But, my ability is limited, and the writing is not as exciting as the original work. The title of the book is The Villain's Counterattack. I won't mention the woman, but I'm just talking about it, but it's actually Liu Xiahui! What is a counterattack? Didn't die in the end? Was it a counterattack? In my opinion, the protagonist is like a Fuwa who brings good luck and benefits to decent people. How miserable is Chen Guorong's original work? My colleagues are dead, my brother-in-law is dead, my wife has been disfigured after the breakup, and her future is ruined. After being attacked by you, Chen Guorong, who has nothing to do with the protagonist, has nothing to do with him, and his life is much more nourishing than in the original work. On the contrary, the protagonist's nominal father was transformed into a villain and sent to prison to lose his reputation. What a counterattack! I haven't watched it since, it's really...

I personally feel that this book may be a bit off-putting, but of course this is just my personal opinion. I came here for the villain, and then I found out that the protagonist is a good person,,,, and that kind of hypocritical (the kind of person who pretends to be a good person). It's not bad for the Virgin, because the protagonist can kill, but it's definitely not the villain, because the protagonist kills the bad guys in his own team (a group of terminally ill people, the protagonist asked them to rob a bank with him, and then when they were surrounded by the police, the protagonist asked them if they wanted to find a beautiful hostage to have fun with, and then they believed it and went to find it. Before they could take action, the protagonist stabbed them all in the back). It's hard to understand the author's thinking, maybe I'm too shallow. Then I see that there are some opinions in the comment area, so I will also say some.

The task of ruining his father's reputation was a failure. It was worse than putting up his pants and not recognizing anyone after finishing the job. It's normal to be afraid of Chen Guorong, after all, he was an ordinary person before. But rising to fear is abnormal. After all, I have been living in Hong Kong for three or four years, and my family background is very strong. If Chen Guorong was not the protagonist, there would be no need to pick him up. When the villain wants to rise, it's okay if you don't step on the protagonist, but you lick him. He even plans to uphold justice and send his family members to jail. Is there something wrong with the author? It's reasonable for you to find a few other people as protagonists to have this task.

I didn't want to watch it when I saw the protagonist taking Ning Zhongze through time.

A headline-grabbing pig's foot is a good guy pretending to be a villain. We have done a lot of things to eliminate evil and promote good, but not a single bad thing. It's really selling dog meat over sheep's head!

Chapter 49, the author said that the population of Hong Kong in 1995 was more than 2 million, and he was not dedicated at all. He was too lazy to check the data. Your data is from 1959. The population in 1995 was more than 6 million. No wonder the results are not good.

The word comes from Japanese, "counterattack" (ぎゃくしゅう), with synonyms of counterattack and counterattack. Encyclopedia explanation: 1. Counterattack with a small force during defense. 2. Commonly used terms in online games, which are different from the normal way for players to attack NPCs. Counterattack refers to NPCs launch attacks on cities or bases where players gather. Such attacks usually occur as festival events or daily activities, and provide generous rewards to attract players to participate in defensive actions. 3. In anime, they often refer to certain abnormal attacks. R>4. A commonly used term in online games, which refers to a successful counterattack in the face of adversity. 5. It is often used to describe a situation or situation that was originally a failure, but finally achieved a successful result. Usually, it refers to a successful counterattack in the face of adversity. It expresses a spirit of self-improvement and full of positive energy. Don't mention positive energy, just talk about going from failure to success. Isn't it a counterattack? Guan Zu in the first world was originally dead, but he didn't die. There was a great horror between life and death. Doesn't it count as a counterattack? The death of Dongxing Crow, from being killed by Chen Haonan to conquering Chen Haonan, is not considered a counterattack? Then the question is, why do so many people think that the villain's counterattack must be a villain? To paraphrase a popular saying? The words: No one can beat our table tennis, and no one can beat our football. Both of them are unbeatable, but they have completely different meanings. Why do you insist on the meaning of the word villain in your understanding, and say that I am selling sheep over others, but do not combine it with the setting in the opening chapter? How to actually draw a conclusion? Clicking words and quoting them out of context, only looking at the two words villain and not the four words "the movie world" in front of it? It is obvious that time travel to infinity, the beginning also said that ordinary people time travel and become villains, not villains time travel to become villains, how can it be certain? The protagonist is required to act unscrupulously, even to commit all kinds of evil? To be honest, does Guan Zu really hate Chen Guorong? He had the opportunity to kill Chen Guorong more than once, but he didn't kill him. The only person he really hated was his father, so he didn't kill Chen Guorong in connection with the mission. A little bit. It is always said that the original protagonist has a better life than the original plot, which is not consistent with the villain. Excuse me, do you turn a blind eye to the protagonist Wu Yan learning fighting and shooting from Chen Guorong? You just say that he is a normal person, and you shouldn't want it? Kill a good policeman, and there is no conflict of interest at all. As I said, this is a story about an ordinary person who traveled through time and became a villain, not a story about a villain who traveled through time and became a villain. After talking about counterattack, I am speechless after reading the comments. , Here it is said that the protagonist, the Holy Mother, is not a villain, and there is also said that the protagonist has a problem with his three views. He traveled through time and became Guan Zu and cheated his father, not being a son of man... He did not say that the mission was based on Guan Zu's demands, but only talked about cheating on his father. Is that the protagonist's father? Okay, according to your theory, I borrowed it? Guan Zu's identity requires filial piety, so is Guan Zu's own opinion more important? Then is the task issued by the system that helps the protagonist obtain Guan Zu's identity more important? Besides, if you don't complete the task, then what else should I write? R>It's hard to agree with everyone. When I write about pure villains, there are more defenders. When I write about good people, there are more people who call the Holy Mother a bitch. I write whether it's good or bad. I act based on my own interests. Both sides criticize me. Criticism can indeed make people grow. I also accept criticism, but can I not take it lightly? To rise to the level of personality? Can you not add some unnecessary ones? I am a shopper. I have collected tens of thousands of books in the same period, and my collection is only 8407, but it only shows that some readers think it is okay. If you like spicy food, just let all the chefs put chili pepper in everything they cook. If you don't like spicy food, just think that chili pepper shouldn't exist in this world. It seems off topic, but it doesn't matter. I will still read the book reviews, and some people will definitely criticize them. The possibility of convincing others on the Internet will always be there. All are 0. I don't seek to convince everyone, I just want to express my thoughts, and I also respect your right to express your thoughts. Finally: There is a long way to go, and we will meet again if we are destined. If there is no river crab mythical beast, maybe the starting point of the villain you want to see is everywhere.

It can only be said that the author's title is wrong. Basically, the readers attracted by this title want to see how the villain defeats the protagonist, rather than seeing the villain become a more holy being than the protagonist.

This book should be considered as selling sheep's head to dog meat. Judging from the title of the book, I thought it was a villain's counterattack, using various means to achieve his goal, defeating the upright, and finally becoming the winner. But I was defeated in the first world at the beginning. It was too different from what I thought. There was no sense of excitement at all, and there was no sense of pleasure at all. It was really tasteless. I thought it would be the time of the robbery, but it turned out to be four years ago. I thought the bank robberies would continue (maintaining the original cast, after all, they all have good backgrounds and good abilities), but the world merged. . . . . . Anyway, the author does have ideas for all kinds of unexpected things, but I can't get to that point anyway. Then the second world, Young and Dangerous, Good Guys, what is it written about? Is it Young and Dangerous? In addition, the behavior and thoughts of the protagonist may be different from the normal people in my eyes. It's actually bigger than 🐔, and it also has ideas for making money. I suggest you read more other Hong Kong variety novels, they are more profitable than this one.

It turns out that the so-called villain's counterattack means that the original protagonist lives a more prosperous life, and the original villain dies more miserably...