I'm Letting the Players Loose

No, I just want to know one thing: if you ask any game player, aside from games like GTA where the focus is on having fun, tell me which players would go on a crazy killing NPCs like an idiot in an online game??? Of course, not all players are at the same level.

The game is forced into darkness; players have no reason to kill, and even the protagonist doesn't care. This isn't a real game.

Players: What are we? Readers: You are the main characters! Players: What are we doing? Readers: You are fighting! Players: Who is Atomic Impact? Reader: He's a guy who doesn't update very often! Players: What should we do? Reader: Let's stir things up! Let's stir things up! Let's stir things up!

These aren't players caught in a natural disaster; they're a bunch of lunatics.

This book is not bad, but it's too dark. Most of those who abandoned it or called it "poisonous" felt it was too dark. Also, who is the protagonist? The one who created this game and intended to use players to earn Source Points is the protagonist of this book. But from the beginning until now, I've only seen one mission to earn Source Points, which was the Resident Evil mission.

I just want to ask, when you play the online game DNF (Dungeon Fighter Online), who among you kills Seria and all the other NPCs at the beginning? Who gives you quests in the early and mid-game? Of course, some of you might want to kill Seria, and I think some people might have that thought. But who kills the job change NPC? Who kills the enchanting NPC? Who kills the quest NPC?

The author writes dark fiction, but it's disguised as the Fourth Calamity. If you can't stand dark stories, you can click the X. However, very few people actually make money writing dark fiction. Those who enjoy reading dark fiction generally have low moral standards and are mostly looking for freebies; this is why this book performed so poorly. Going against mainstream values ​​comes at a price.

I couldn't continue reading after chapter ten; it was really depressing. Even in games, there are moments that move us. Killing the guiding NPC right at the start... For example, Seria in DNF (Dungeon Fighter Online). What would happen if the player killed Seria at the beginning? It feels like the author is just forcing a "Darkness" twist, like they're just using the Jeanne d'Arc Alter trope.

As long as you can kill NPCs in the game, regardless of whether there's any benefit, give it a try—who knows, you might find something good. Players causing trouble early on, at worst they'll die and revive or delete their account; there's no real loss. Killing NPCs early on makes perfect sense.

Holy crap, this perfectly matches the real-life identities of these "players." Aren't they just "elementary school kids"?! Randomly select options at the start: No experienced gamer would choose an option that is obviously bad (clearly not a good thing) when starting out (whether in online or offline games).