Fox of France

I just happened to see an article, "Venus of the Empire" - Pauline Bonaparte, the legendary sister of Napoleon I During her second husband, she carved a nude statue of herself. Pauline Bonaparte's request was obviously more "extraordinary", but due to her strong insistence, her husband finally had to give in. Antonio Canova had previously created an almost naked "War Statue" for his brother Napoleon I, and he must have adapted to the maverick nature of the Bonaparte family. The master spent three years working for Paulina and finally completed the immortal masterpiece "Venus Victrix" (Venus Victrix) in 1808. This life-size marble sculpture is based on the famous myth "Three Goddesses Fighting for the Golden Apple". Venus is holding a golden apple, lying on the couch, calm and radiant. The statue's facial features are entirely those of Pauline Bonaparte herself, while the figure conforms almost perfectly to ancient Greek standards. The hot gossip topic in Italian social circles at that time was: "Did Paulina Bonaparte strip off and act as Canova's model?" It is said that someone really asked Paulina about this in person. The latter's answer was heroic: "No problem, the stove is lit in the studio and it's warm."

It's written like a chronicle, the old author's writing is so bad, Napoleon's heroism is not seen at all, he is like a little kid, and the protagonist has no sense of existence. What is it written about? The worst magic penetration I have ever seen, it is far worse than La Glory de France, Flowers and Swords

The protagonist is currently in the developmental stage, but I personally think that the protagonist has too many concerns about historical figures such as Robespierre. Robespierre's guillotine was terrifying, but why did he get on it in the end? To put it bluntly, they were just a group of partisan fighters. The best way to deal with them was to take control of the military. Just look at what the head of state did. You will know that if you really control an army, all of them together will not be your opponent. If not, just flip the table.

This is a thoughtful book. Some of the plots use a modern perspective to look at the past history, and combined with the current international situation, you will have your own thoughts🤔, not bad, I like it very much

This is my first reward, although it is not much, please accept it. The requirements are very low, just a non-prisoner.

Author, do you know that in fact no one reads your novels at all? These are all my trumpets. Believe it or not, I just look at them and they all dig 666.

Since 1855, the American tycoon has been pursuing milk bottle books. What I like most is his insight into human nature from history. Human nature after thinking and debating, I think he recognizes it from the bottom of his heart. This also allows me to read his books with confidence. Even sometimes the content can be used as an achievable reference for authenticity. If people are abilities, they are like numerators, and your evaluation of yourself is the denominator. For example, outstanding people love to learn and are able to overcome difficulties one after another. Napoleon faced all difficulties confidently and defeated them as much as possible, and he also loved learning very much. Almost all of his interests were attracted by war. It is precisely because of this that the legend of Napoleon exists. The various abilities of the protagonists in the book who are fifteen or sixteen years old, if placed in other novels, they would be the so-called bosses, the so-called wise men. Their abilities and vision do make me ashamed, but this is also an inevitable trend of middle-class performance. Milk Bottle himself likes history very much. His knowledge is accumulated on history. Because he is familiar with history, it can be seen that he also likes history very much and he has an inescapable fate - he will be connected with history in this life. It is foreseeable that after these years of accumulation, what he can bring will not be a vulgar, same old story that you think is the same over and over again. Perhaps when you are reading a book, your eyes will occasionally light up, and these highlights are the highlights of the explosion of inspiration generated by the milk bottle over the years.

This seems to be the author's first book? Let me give you some suggestions The author should also have discovered that this book has obviously started to rise and fall... In the past, there were many readers, but now there are fewer and fewer readers. There are reasons for both the large number of readers and the small number of readers. Let's talk about the advantages: The previous results are obviously good. The most fascinating thing is the language and translation in daily life. Half a year later, I am still impressed. The author is obviously good at writing about political struggles, such as Fouche, Robles and other influential figures during the French Revolution, as well as various social changes. The writing is also very good. The shortcomings are very serious: 1. There is almost no description of the diplomacy of major powers around the world, or even in Europe, and the exchanges between countries. The reader does not even know which countries France is at war with. They can only guess: Oh, maybe it is those countries in the original history during the Great Revolution? In short, descriptions of countries other than France are completely lost. The reader is in a fog and has no idea which countries France is at war with, nor what the situation is, nor where to start. I have to write about the European HRE, right? I also need to write about Northern Europe, right? Is there one in North Africa too? Italy must have it too, right? Spain and Portugal must also have it, right? The entire perspective makes people feel: there are only France and the United Kingdom, plus half of the North American continent, and the rest is covered in the fog of war, and no map has been opened yet. 2. Although everyone knows that the protagonist of the "Struggle for Hegemony" will change from Joseph to France, but after winning the supreme power of France, the protagonist's change and perspective change are too blunt. The early successes were completely lost. 3. The protagonist writes about international strategies, diplomatic disputes, and alliances. It is indeed poorly written. To be honest, I suggest you learn from someone who wrote about the Holy Roman Empire. I think his writing in this aspect is good. 4. Authors are always full of personal information, and readers actually don't like authors who have too many personal items, especially those who read Western historical texts. Many people have their own ideas. When your personal information conflicts with readers, it will be difficult for readers to continue reading. Moreover, the large length of private goods and "Look, sister" really affect the sense of immersion and overall sense, making readers feel that this book is the author's self-venting rather than writing a good story. At this point, I hope the author will continue to work hard and write better in the next book. So far, this book has actually been unable to save the day, and it is not a big deal to end it hastily... The most read country in Western history is probably Germany. I personally think you can give it a try.

Today's insult to the law

Isn't France the weakest country in Europe? It feels like the only one who is most famous is Napoleon, and no one else can beat him at other times.

There is another book to read

Looking at the title, I thought you were going to write about Richelieu.

Why are there so many bratty brats? I really don't know who is the boss in the EU now?

The Tsar's system is much smarter than the system adopted by the protagonist. Expanding territory in Europe will not only increase support, but also gain military morale. On the surface, it promotes a multi-party system, but in fact it does not allow multiple parties to enter the electoral mechanism and public opinion. Propagate anti-Western, anti-liberalization, and anti-democratic public opinion. One person, one vote is allowed on the business card, but in reality, if the vote result is unfavorable, it will be done in secret. Of course Napoleon won the election without operating behind the scenes. In fact, the royalist party has always been very powerful in the French political system, which shows that the French people admire strongman rule. The French people are not suitable for democracy. A republican system with French characteristics can be implemented. You can definitely learn from the Tsar's system. The tsarist system was hereditary. Kidnapping France to Napoleon will not overthrow the rule of the Bonaparte family.

There are quite a lot of breast-feeding brats in the comment area. I also played breast-feeding memes, but only during World War II. Breast-feeding has passed at any time. For breast-feeding brats who want to breast-feed at any time, I recommend reading history.

How can the British army fight with grenades? The British army was filled with conscripted gangsters and criminals. All British officers were purchased officers. How could it be possible to be as serious and responsible as what is written in this book? Most British Army officers had never been to a barracks. The official hat of a British officer is like trading in stocks. Buy low and sell high. If the prime minister or the king wants to appoint an officer, he must also spend money to buy the official position. The British official buying system is much more advanced than the European military officer system. In France, only nobles can serve as military officers. Only great nobles can become generals. The bourgeoisie can at best be a platoon leader.

The best part of this book is the Revolution. I feel that the book has lost its power after the Emperor came to power. Unlike the turbulent times during the Revolution, when there was a steady stream of pressure to force the protagonist to move forward, Joseph's temperament was too stable, and all crises were basically nipped in the bud. By now, it feels like France, controlled by the Bonaparte family, is invincible. Without pressure, there is no motivation. I don't know how the author can write in the future. Now we have started to rush through the subplot, with dozens of chapters about the Irish Revolution coming at every turn, which really doesn't seem very interesting. I hope the author will tighten up the plot and create some new contradictions and pressures for the protagonist. Otherwise, looking at the current plot direction, it will basically be France mindlessly pushing the whole world. Anyway, it will win no matter what the war is. The politics, economy and culture comprehensively crush the entire Europe. There is no tension and conflict that the story should have.

The second brush was disgusted. There were so many private goods, and the stuffing was very blunt, and the jokes were played regardless of the background of the times. In the past, it was only because of the French Revolution that it attracted people. After the French Revolution, the perspective shifted to the Irish Revolution, which was full of private goods. This book became a defense. It is recommended to stop at Chapter 130, as the following content will make you feel sick to your stomach.

New Rome, starting from the European continent, covers me on all sides; France, fake trade, hides poisonous schemes. Spain, occupying the fortress, peeks into West Africa: The Netherlands, the South African Territory, looks towards the east. The United States rebelled against the bandits and took Taihua, then returned to Tuhawan; Ireland rebelled and established itself, splitting the territory and dividing the territory. This Britain, and that, do I still have a share? This parliament, originally, existed in name only. For Caesar, be a local official; Suppress me, and all the people will surrender.

I would like to ask in the next book, is Pig Knuckle assisting Napoleon, or is Joseph himself the boss? 😜If it's an auxiliary role, I don't think it's interesting.

Is the author still there? Can he write a novel like 1855? Isn't it better to have a conglomerate controlling the country than to be the president?

The section about the Irish Resistance Army will definitely not pass the CNKI check for plagiarism. It is OK to make jokes, but copying books is not. And the Suvorov section later, what about trench warfare? In fact, Europe's tactics are not updated very quickly at all. The speed is relative to that of Asia and Africa. How can they adapt to changes on the battlefield and immediately practice new tactics?

Author, you are so courageous. I read the last few chapters of your 1855 American Tycoon. You tore off the skin of class rule and revealed a terrifying and terrifying demon head. It really doesn't matter the system, it is violent rule that only serves yourself... I dare not say more.

Just came from Zhihu...

Are there any similar novels, foreign hegemony articles, or business articles that you would recommend?

The book is really good, but as I read it, I found that I couldn't stand it anymore. The plot logic and characters are fine, but I can't stand the perspective behind the protagonist's actions. I can't replace myself as a capitalist. Every time I watch it, I have a strong urge to put the protagonist on the street. At first, I just thought this feeling was a bit funny. But then I couldn't help it during the Paulina Olympics. It was very defensive. Didn't you just do the Olympics and do it dirty? At this time, your Bonaparte family wants nothing, and you don't even have the fairness, justice and aboveboard attitude to host the Olympics. This kind of thing is not funny at all. During the Republic of China, our athletes went to participate in the Olympics because they did not adapt to the venue in advance. Their performance dropped a lot, and their final results were not very good. When I saw this in the book, I didn't find it funny or refreshing, only a faint sense of ridicule. Coubertin really used the spirit of sports to host the Olympics. Since the protagonist has taken the lead, can he not be so materialistic? I have always known that the protagonist has no noble spiritual character and charm, but it was not until this plot point that I discovered that he is purely vulgar.

Hahaha, the author actually only has two books left😂

Is there a postscript to 1855 American Tycoon? I really want to know what later generations think of Scrooge.

Reprinted after 1855, about Shi Gaozhi's son 😍

Author, can you write some follow-up to 1855? Brother, what you wrote in the end was not good at all. First, his niece was assassinated and then he left. He did not write about his achievements, encyclopedias of later generations, and his family. Anyway, it gave me a very unfinished feeling. It would be much more comfortable to write an introduction like Wang Zijun's "The Rise of the Literary Heroes of the Republic of China". It would be better to write about the impact on the world, Europe, and China. It's very normal to die now. I'm very unhappy, bro.