The Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches in DC

To be honest, as an old bookworm who has been reading online literature for no less than 12 years, this book feels very awkward. The awkward part lies in the power system. The name of this book is Tiangang Disha. The power system is already written in the title, so I should point out the topic. After reading dozens of chapters, I quickly flipped through it. The book is better than Tiangang Disha even though the book is titled Swordsman. If you let a newbie read it, he might enjoy it, but if you let a reader who has been more than four years old read it, it will probably be unbearable. To give the simplest example, the protagonist arrived in the world of Condor Heroes and met Yang Guo. Yang Guo hit him with a sad palm, and he either used Qinggong to avoid it or fought against it. At this time, the protagonist suddenly raised his hand and it was a Shinra Tianzheng. . . That was extremely embarrassing. Practice Tiangang Disha, even if you are a magician, but it turns out that Mao has no magic. He pulls out his sword and strikes people with this routine. This kind of routine is found in 99% of this kind of books. It is not very attractive. The theme of Tiangang Disha is good and makes people shine, but the result is still "Master Becomes a Warrior". If you want to make money, you have to write routines that others have not written before. You can still read novels about traveling to other worlds in the past. When you see the title or category later, you will know the fixed routines: waste wood, slap in the face, auction, leapfrog monsters, breakthrough at any time, even the introduction I can skip to read; urban writing is more exaggerated, one thousand stories are the same. Lu: No one knows him at first, then he meets a beautiful CEO, and then various women like the protagonist, and then the protagonist shows strange abilities, and then makes money to buy a house and a car. In the process, there must be a group of wealthy men and women who come to show off in front of the protagonist, and then get slapped in the face, without even reading the introduction. Here, I sincerely hope that the author can write eye-catching content🙂. ——Advice from an old bookworm.

Book friends can no longer stand my attitude of not asking for votes. Those of you who are just wandering around, come on, I need your votes here!

Blindly guessing pig's feet will not make you a Tiangang Disha in a lifetime. As a Chinese Kung Fu, it is basically practiced according to the ideas of the ancients. Confucius said that repaying grievances directly... Taoists understand cause and effect, one life for another... The ascetics even kill demons and eliminate evil spirits... The original body's The obsession is revenge... And then Pig's Feet barely goes through any serious psychological struggle. With a few words of philosophy... He said that if he kills someone, he is a bad person... And let the enemy who killed his father go... (And a lot of broken four-finger bones will be disabled for the rest of his life...)? ? ? ? , Facing a physical enhancer, not to mention a bunch of black technology... Forget it, I can't complain.

I haven't read a few chapters, but I'm just wondering why the protagonist has to go fight gangs at night? Wouldn't it be better for you to practice more if you have the time? It's not like you don't know that this is a dangerous group in DC. Instead of improving your strength quickly, you're going to fight some minions? As for wanting to avenge his original father, that's not to say that he won't do it. At least, he should wait until he has some ability to protect himself! According to a normal person's thinking, shouldn't he stay at home and practice hard, and then go and avenge his father when he has some strength? As a result, your mother practiced training all night and couldn't wait to fight against the gang? I'm so impressed┗┃ ■ ┃┛! ! ! ! I still can't understand the inability to punish evil, so I'm wondering, have you never been beaten up by society? Who do you think you are? Is it her mother, Liang Jingru, who gave you the courage to meddle in your own business? I'm not saying that the protagonist should be a cold-blooded person, and that if you help him as much as you can, why don't you care about yourself and become a superhero? Really, do you think you are a person? I don't know why these authors like to write about protagonists who have some ability to fight crimes. On the one hand, it is inefficient, and on the other hand, it wastes time. It's okay if it helps to improve your own strength. In the end, it is completely untenable reasons and then the protagonist goes to fight criminals inexplicably. I am really convinced.

I can't stand it anymore after reaching chapter 13. I can let go of my revenge for killing my father. What do you mean, killing one person is the same as killing countless people. Why the hell do you think you are Batman? It's too poisonous. Slip away.

The author's writing style is good, but the reason why the results are not very good is largely due to the coordination problem of the system. I feel that using Tiangang Disha to write Zhutianliu, the results should be better than this one.

Really red crane crown! Highly toxic, enter with caution. The protagonist's father died, and the protagonist beat the enemy who killed his husband and let him go.

Before, I felt that the battle was a bit poisonous, so I skipped the one that defeated Bugi Chao. These are not big problems, really, because it doesn't matter if they are short, just skip the long ones. 😒 But when dealing with the unjust super, he was suddenly fed shit... ① To give the author some popular science, the absolute main body of DC is the American world view. It is impossible to add a death penalty amendment to this system (note, this does not refer to the continental or maritime legal system, but the cultural system), and then give the unjust the death penalty in a fair and just way. Based on the basis of American culture and law, there are so many people who want to overturn the verdict voluntarily, so it is not a matter of discussion for 5 days. Moreover, in a long litigation, 5, 10, or 50 years, the subject of the litigation will also change in various ways, but don't even think about the death penalty. ✊ I am not talking about this to popularize the judicial issues in the United States. This is the fault that I associate with the author after being poisoned by the author's nonsense. I think the author is writing blindly, at the back. ↓↓↓↓↓ 🙏②: Co-authored by elite lawyers around the world to engage in major discussions that have a ground-breaking impact on their world, and then all these people talk about is keyboard content. It's time for another cheerful wrangling in the British Parliament, but has anyone ever told you that things like Parliament are just for expressing opinions? Apart from the British Parliament, I really can't think of any other place where the author could take keyboard politics seriously. If it really comes down to debate, the legality of the Superman Reign alone can drag on for months or even years. This involves the definition of civilization, history, and philosophy, and becomes a debate between the two sides of systematic theory. If you just search the Internet now, you can find a lot of so-called philosophical dilemmas in human culture. There is no way to solve these problems in a short time. What's funny is that the author actually describes keyboard politics in this kind of debate. … 🙏③, authoritarian law to the point I really can't complain about this. We have just overthrown the authoritarian monopoly based on superhuman personal strength; now we have to establish an authoritarian legal system based on the strength of justice and implemented through law. It's wonderful, Batman's brain is indeed better than Superman's, just like the means of economic colonization are much more advanced than direct colonization. However, the true nature of authoritarianism remains unchanged. At best, it can only be regarded as the new king overthrowing the old king. It is a typical authoritarian thought to use the death of a super dynasty person or the preset goal to be achieved in controversial issues as a premise to establish judicial credibility or authority. [To give a contrary example]: In the public trial, the Red Party only revealed the facts and then did what everyone recognized. The goal set is what everyone in society thinks they should do after learning the truth. At least there are no controversial plots similar to those set in the novel. … 🙏④Persecution This is a derivative of the opposite example given above. In fact, there were mistakes in the public trial meeting. In fact, it is similar to the way the author set up the trial of Superman. Historically, this kind of thing was called persecution. One thing to remember is that the person being persecuted does not necessarily mean he is innocent. Let's use the original work as an example, such as Superman killing the clown in anger. To persecute improper behavior, highlight the key points and test Chinese language comprehension. It's not that you have to frame the good and the good to be called persecution, but it doesn't seem to matter if you persecute the traitor. It's just a method of persecuting traitors to give the law a platform. This legal method has a stronger meaning of political leadership than administration. It is simply a shame for legal science. … ⑤ I won't clasp my fists here, because this is too much. They keep talking about legislation and enforcing the law, but judging from the lawsuits and various issues that may be involved, the necessary legal procedures have not been followed at all, or have not been completed. The unjust Superman Dynasty has just been overthrown, and now there is an unjust court. The world is hopeless. … 🙏⑥Don't ask me about whether it is brought into reality. If it is brought into reality for speculation, then the DC world will be dark. If I bring it into reality, just from the situation in Gotham, Arkham Asylum, the private prison industry in the United States in reality, and public opinion tools, I can use completely reasonable logic to deduce that all members of the Justice League are villains.

In fact, whether Tiangang and Disha are harmonious in the world of American comics is another matter. Can the protagonist not be too licky to the original plot character? This is fan fiction. The protagonist's character is very vague and I can't figure out what he wants to do. Then there is nothing to say about killing one's father and his enemy, repaying evil with kindness. Learning from Batman not to kill humans, well, there's nothing much to say, it's okay to be disabled. Then there is the issue of female characters. Why make the protagonist look silly? You should have heard that female characters in American comics are very playful. It is boring to engage in ambiguity these days, so just refuse it. As for the question about the master, it should be Master Bodhi.