You Are a Pearl, Mo Mengchen

1. I rewatched all seven Pacers games and all Bulls games in the Finals. First of all, Rodman never had the upper hand in key games. In the playoffs that year, not only because of age, gambling, women, or various factors, Da Chong's state has been struggling and ups and downs. He could not completely suppress Barkley, who was urged to lose weight by pig's feet. This is the first point of illogical logic. 2. Hill's personal mental resistance. I specifically searched for various Hill documentaries and school speech records on eBay, as well as comments from classmates. I can only draw one conclusion: As a typical child from a wealthy middle-class family, who graduated from a prestigious school with excellent athletic talent, participated in multiple sports and had the ability to win medals, Hill had no lack of aggressiveness and desire to win before he was seriously injured. Because from her personal confident speech and the impressions of her classmates, it can be seen that such a winner in life who can be said to have won since she was a child will never be a girl who is defeated when encountering some setbacks. They are not flowers in a greenhouse. In addition to highlighting Pigfoot's personal shaping, your way of writing is, in a sense, an insult to the fighters of Hill's era. 3. I re-read Zen Master's autobiography after leaving the Lakers, and it clearly mentioned that "I actually hate coaches who play on the spot and yell. In my opinion, the main job of a coach in any game is to do a lot of detailed work before the game" and other similar remarks. And as far as I know (since I started watching football in 2005), the Zen Master in my impression is not the kind of head coach whose advantage is to have an idea on the spot. In a sense, Zen Master's in-game response was actually substandard, or several beats too slow. 4. Understand your admiration and admiration for the basketball god who shaped all the beautiful fantasies about the basketball world in your youth. But I don't understand your sense of tearing when the main plot and introduction of a web novel do not match the content. I think this is the paradox. The words are finished

This is probably the best basketball article I have ever seen. Many people say that losing to Jordan was a bad point. I personally think that such a big setback is the biggest source of the birth of God Mo. No one will have smooth sailing. Naochi only proved himself in the third championship. It was only after lbj won the championship in Kecun that we considered whether he and Bird were more legendary. It was only when Kawhi was carrying the team with the Raptors that we remembered that this guy is a monster. Therefore, it is more realistic to abuse the master reasonably.

Since it was written from the NBA of that era, if the Bulls dynasty led by Jordan did not win a championship, then this book would be meaningless!

Looking back from the superstar side, I saw that Jordan was killed (forcibly) in the third year after I had just cast a few monthly votes, and the urge to abandon the book was infinite. The author gave too many psychological expectations of killing Jordan, and then the excitement turned into a poisonous one. The plot was too realistic and the writing was deceptive. I can begin to understand why Superstar won the FMVP smoothly in his first year. Before seeing this, I thought this book was better than Superstar, but I worried too much.

Jordan retires next season, can the protagonist surpass him? ? Is it possible to surpass Bobcat Jordan? ? ? It's so interesting to write! ! ! 😅 The protagonist will win ten championships in the future, which will be lower than Jordan!

Please change the introduction, from the need to step on the legend to the one who must be stepped on by the legend. Otherwise, people who have never read your book will be tricked into it by the bells and whistles in your introduction. It will be a bad experience. Be a human being. This is the last post. I will delete the book and say goodbye. Never see you again. I will never read a word of your book again.

I can only say that it's a good thing that I stopped watching it when I saw the trend of losing to the Bulls. To be honest, I was drunk even if this lineup could lose. I don't understand whether the author understands football or not.

Knee twice? Which NBA team will choose a glass man who hasn't played in a few years? I found that I couldn't read more than a few chapters of several NBA books written by this author, and they are full of poisonous points.

I suddenly became stupid and wrote a book just to lose. I don't think many people will continue reading it.

If the Bulls lose, just give up and enjoy yourself slowly. If you can even lose this Red Bull, don't tell me you can beat the OK combination.