Starting Today, I Am Xiang Yu

Not to mention how many pieces of historical data can be used to discredit Xiang Ji from the beginning to the end, the king is no more than Xiang, and he is no more than Li. You can pick out a historical figure, even if you are in the dark, and call him a brainless idiot, dare not recognize his name as an overlord? The only thing in official history that clearly records the killing of a hundred people, military talent? It also combines the concept of being an enemy of ten thousand people. Not to mention the existence of the Xiang's Disciples, which can make countless novels spread out to list the rankings of ancient special forces. Xiang Yu, who knew how to fight, and whose deeds of caring for his soldiers have been handed down to this day, and whose personal bravery is unprecedented and unparalleled to this day, even Sima Qian was considered an emperor, Such a celebrity who has been in love with Yu Ji for eternity and even foreigners can find out about him, You actually don't focus on the few decisions and employment decisions that have been criticized in his historical materials, but instead slander his character, his tendency to abandon everything, and his personal feelings? A scam? Bai Qi and Han Xin have fewer pitfalls? Isn't he the same as a soldier? Would Han Xin dare to cheat Liu Bang if he didn't have any confidence? Is it different that Bai Qi was signaled and acquiesced? Cooking people? Do any of you know what cooking is? Liu Bang, who you keep saying is so good, is clearly written in the historical records, which can be found on Baidu. Not many years after he conquered the world, because Peng Yue was tired, he chopped off his head and hung it on the city gate. Then Luan Bu went to take it off. This Sun immediately became so angry that the pot was heated up and they wanted to stew him. In the end, he was afraid and forced his men to rebel, so he didn't do it. This matter is not written in the textbook? There is actually a comparative gap. On the other hand, if Xiang Yu is not as good as Liu Bang, how brutal is his cooking? At that time, the king of Qi cooked and killed Li Shiqi or who said it? Was this a formal punishment in those days? Are you out of your minds? Are there not many people who have been stewed without formal records? Just like shooting these days, foreigners think we are barbaric. Isn't it funny? In ancient times, it was a normal punishment to cut a body into pieces with five horses, and cut people into pieces and grade them into slices of meat. Not to mention the Qin Dynasty's criminal law, which was exposed every day and was cruel. You know that cooking is cruel, but do you know how many outstanding people have been stewed, skinned, castrated, and soaked for hundreds of thousands of years? You can still say this so confidently and seriously, what do you want those resentful souls to say? Do you know that not many years ago, no one took care of the pig cages in the countryside? Think about it, what kind of custom in ancient times could still say that kind of thing? And don't look at how many heroes Liu Bang killed? Han Xin, who was the most capable of fighting, was punished to death, not to mention that all those who were not as good as him were slaughtered. The harem also established a prince and started fighting, and personally... Those years were full of chaos, weren't they more ruthless? Do you think there was no torture at that time? Can you suppress a group of people who rebelled below? Don't talk about Liu Bang stewing and cutting people in peacetime, let's talk about the Chu-Han struggle for hegemony. How many people were stewed? Switch over and see who Xiang Yu is cooking? He wanted to stew Liu Bang's biological father to threaten him. Liu Bang simply said that we are brothers, and my father is also your father. When the time comes, I will share a bowl with you. If you feel like it, you can stew it. What can Xiang Yu do if he can have such a talentless and scoundrel answer? Compared to that little thing, what is it? Just bring up some bad things about Liu Bang and it can't be more scandalous, and you still talk about his character?

Liu Ji was a traitor, he was ruthless, selfish, cold-blooded, and good at deceiving people. However, some people insisted on whitewashing Liu Bang and beautifying Liu Bang as an emperor who saved the world from fire and water and did good for the people. They even refused to admit the negative records of Liu Bang in the history books. The history books of his family property and the records that the Liu emperors of all dynasties recognized, but those modern Bangchui did not recognize. If Xiang Yu, a loser, could be forgiven for being smeared in history books, which historian would dare to maliciously smear him or be able to maliciously smear him as the founding emperor of the dynasty? In order to whitewash Liu Bang's massacre of heroes, he even refused to admit that a king with a different surname was Liu Bang's subordinate. Does this stuff lead to expulsion? Not counting Liu Bang's subordinates, can he be promoted as emperor? Can the princes and kings come to see you with just one decree? Can I change the location of the country? Yes, there are seemingly legitimate reasons for killing kings with different surnames, but the legitimate reasons are the same, and they are all killed one after another for treason. Doesn't this explain the problem? If you really want to rebel, everyone will rebel together. Only if everyone doesn't want to rebel can Liu Ji have the opportunity to defeat each other. Isn't this killing the hero? Liu Bang did not kill Zhang Liang, Xiao He and Fan Kuai, but the survival of these three people depended on their own ability and luck. Liu Bang was motivated to kill, and the history books record it very clearly. I can't figure out why some people whitewash Liu Bang's character. His character is just scumbag. Most feudal emperors were cold-blooded, especially the founding emperor. There were probably only two people who didn't kill the heroes, one was Li Shimin and the other was Liu Xiu. In order to praise Liu Bang, some people have washed away the real Liu Bang, haha. Ten thousand steps back, even if those kings with different surnames really rebelled and deserved to be killed, someone rebelled almost every year during Liu Bang's eight years in power. Does this mean that Liu Bang was a good emperor? Just the record that Liu Bang chopped Peng Yue into meat sauce and gave it to Yingbu and other princes to eat is not worse than King Zhou, right? When fighting Xiang Yu, he could push all the old and weak in Guanzhong to the battlefield as cannon fodder. What is the advantage of such an emperor?

Liu Ji won the hearts of the people, but Xiang Yu was even more cruel? No! Some people think that Liu Bang was a decent and good emperor just because Liu Bang became emperor and there were a few words of praise in the history books. But have you ever seen any decent person drive all the old and weak people at home to the battlefield? What else can these people do on the battlefield besides being cannon fodder? Why did Xiang Yu defeat Liu Ji's young and strong main force, but couldn't do anything to the old, weak, women and children? Isn't it because Xiang Yu can't bear to kill these cannon fodder human shields? Various historical records smear Xiang Yu's cruelty, but there are some things that cannot be explained by cruelty. In addition, the old and weak in Guanzhong went to fight in the Chu Kingdom, which does not mean that Liu Bang won the hearts of the people, but because the people in Guanzhong had no food to eat, and even went to the point of cannibalism. They could only survive by going to the battlefield to fight and rob the Chu Kingdom. It can be seen from this that Xiang Yu did not massacre any people in Guanzhong. Didn't everyone from the young and the strong to the old and the weak follow Liu Jilai to invade Chu?

I was very angry today when I saw that Xiang Yu's entry on the God of Bianshan was arbitrarily changed by Bang Chui again. There is one sentence that struck me particularly deeply. The guy said that Wang Ling said that Xiang Yu was benevolent and loved because he was deceived by Xiang Yu's acting skills. A lot of eloquent analysis said that Xiang Yu deceived a lot of people, and that Xiang Yu was a tough and cunning person. They couldn't understand how such a good person like Liu Bang could be hated by so many people. I'm surprised, how come the cunning people didn't kill Liu Ji and his family? Why didn't you listen to Fan Zeng and kill Han Xin? How do you lead the way in a war? Why do you always get irritated? Would you rather die than surrender? Who acts like this? Liu Ji's kind of person is called acting when he conquers the world and then turns his back and kills the donkey! Wang Ling said that Xiang Yu was deceived when he loved others? He cannot be deceived by anyone. Didn't Bang Chui always use Xiang Yu to cook the corpse of his mother in the royal mausoleum? Isn't that why Wang Ling took refuge with Liu Ji? How can I still be deceived by Xiang Yu after everything is like this? How can Bangchui analyze this logic? Liu Ji asked everyone at the celebration banquet why he could win but Xiang Yu would fail? Wang Ling said that Xiang Yu was benevolent and loving, and His Majesty was arrogant and insulting. However, Xiang Yu was not good at all, and Liu Ji was good at all. But if Xiang Yu is not a benevolent person, why would Xiang Yu's enemies say that Xiang Yu is benevolent and loves others? There is no need to say this even if it is to praise and criticize him first, right? If Xiang Yu is really so cruel, he should answer Liu Bang and say that Xiang Yu is cruel and unkind, and his majesty conquers the world because he is generous and loving. According to common sense, the benevolent Xiang Yu should be welcomed by everyone more than the humiliating Liu Bang, and he should be more popular in the world, but in fact he is not, so the following words to praise Liu Ji were introduced. This proves from the side that Xiang Yu himself is a benevolent and loving person. As for what Wang Ling said later, it was a bit embarrassing and bragging, and he even took the opportunity to remind Liu Ji what he should do, emphasizing the importance of sharing benefits and being tolerant. Liu Ji doesn't tolerate many people. Can he be considered as benefiting the world by constantly provoking wars? There is no one who has truly made great achievements and is crowned king. Who is jealous of the virtuous and capable? The Han Dynasty required history books to maintain its rule, so Liu Bang's rebellion against Xiang Yu must be politically correct. Therefore, many records about Xiang Yu are negative. How can there be any straightforward positive description in it? But the negative descriptions are unreasonable, the traces of slander are obvious, and they are self-contradictory. This can reflect Xiang Yu's innocence. On the one hand, he was accused of being a woman, but on the other hand, he slaughtered cities and surrendered. His character is constantly collapsing. Slanders full of loopholes can be regarded as truth by some intelligent modern people and even experts. Little do they know that the history books they believe in are not the truth. What dragons, immortals, and all kinds of myths are openly listed in history books. Can such history books also be regarded as truth? Aren't the so-called descriptions of true dragons also intended to consolidate rule? Since in order to consolidate his rule, he even befriended the dragon and gave birth to Emperor Gaozu. Such records were openly written in the history books. Why didn't he maliciously smear Xiang Yu? Since some people don't believe in dragons, why do they still believe in Xiang Yu's illogical information?

An analogy can be made: Xiang Yu is like Wang Sicong, and Liu Bang is like Jack Ma.

Reading the book reviews in the comment section made me doubt the history. I hurriedly searched Baidu and found out that there is no emperor Xiang Yu in history. Looking at the comment section, I thought Xiang Yu was the emperor of the ages.

No one wants to criticize Xiang Yu, but they just can't stand people who brag about Xiang Yu. Xiang Yu is treated really well as a loser. Xiang Yu was introduced by the Confucian school. If he failed, he should just lie down and let people criticize him. However, the Confucians refused to do it and insisted on making Xiang Yu stronger than Liu Bang. In this way, even if the Confucians later boasted that he was a king and a defeated bandit, all the benefits would be taken by the Confucians. That's why you started targeting Confucianism. Aren't you bragging about Xiang Yu? I will go to hell. Aren't you the First Emperor of Qin? I'll blow it to death. Anyway, I'll do it for you.

This protagonist may be a loser. Others want to have sex with his wife, and they want to kill him, but he beat him up and let others go? What the hell

Really, I personally feel that Han Xing's troops are not as good as Xiang Yu's. Except for the last-ditch battle, is he really strong enough to defeat Xiang Yu or does he rely on numbers?

You should be rigorous and treat yourself like an ancient person. In actions, words, and demeanor, the protagonist should be masculine, eager to learn, brave, and knowledgeable. Don't use a funny tone or a modern tone to portray Xiang Yu as the overlord, otherwise it will be neither fish nor fowl.