A Cultivator’s Chronicles in the Marvel Universe

To be honest, sometimes I really hate the superheroes in American comics. Every time a super villain kills so many ordinary innocent people, the superhero just catches the villain in prison, waits for these villains to come out again and kills ordinary innocent people, and then arrests them in prison again, over and over again. In the end, countless ordinary innocent people die, which makes the reputation of superheroes. It's like the role of superheroes cannot be shown without super villains, which makes me think that superheroes are the ultimate evil in the American comic world...

Such a good book can't even be seen on the monthly ticket list. Instead, some embarrassingly written short stories can be found in the top ten. The starting point is really degenerate.

Many readers are arguing about the plot of this book and the original work. Haven't they seen that the author is trying his best to describe a more logical universe view? Everyone knows what the original work is like. There are many contradictions in various senses, and the gap in strength is even more confusing. As for some people who see some things that they don't understand, can you please take a closer look? I see many examples in the comments to demonstrate the author's problems of this and that, which is all nonsense! Your problem is described in great detail in the article, so I won't go into details one by one. Don't evaluate a book based on other people's subjective judgments. What's more, it's a novel. Everyone who reads novels will have fantasies. What the article expresses is always different from what you think. Don't make rash comments on the bad parts to make it appear that you have more ideas? I'm afraid that others don't think so. It's probably because I like this book better, so I won't go into too many bad points to show my incompetence. Tsk, just read the book yourself.

When I first read the reviews of this book, I didn't have much expectations for this book. But I had no other books to read, so I continued reading, and found that this was indeed a very good novel. Let's not talk about why there are so many bad guys picking on me in front of me. But after reading a few chapters, I really found that the author wrote something different from other authors. The author is not a banana, nor does he kneel down to those superheroes. As for the plots in other novels, they did not blindly follow the trend, and were not based on the timelines that most of us are familiar with. They just brushed over the timelines that are familiar to the public, and wrote their own style, a different Marvel. Many plots also have their own way of unfolding. For example, other novels will tell the story of the appearance of Iron Man, or the appearance of the Hulk and Thor, but these plots are familiar to most of us Marvel fans. So the author just mentions it all in one stroke. Even if it is counted, I personally think that the number of water characters that most people say does not cause too much delay. I have read almost 100 chapters. Then come back and post a post to prove that this book is indeed still readable. Brothers who have read bad reviews can also go in and observe. Note: I am not a trustee. This is my first time posting, if you have anything bad to say, please feel free to comment. . .

After reading the first few chapters, the protagonist talked too much and struggled to make up the word count. There is also the character of the protagonist, which feels too frivolous. He is hundreds of years old and he is the legitimate son of a county king. He talks a lot of swear words. I feel that he is not very well-educated, or he is simply set as a man in the market. Moreover, he is also an angry young man, and he does not feel like he has lived for hundreds of years. In addition, what the protagonist said was half-literate and half-vulgar, which looked disgusting. Can he speak normally? The first sentence was vulgar and vulgar, and the second sentence was quoted as an argument. It felt too inconsistent. It would have been fine if it had been vulgar to the end. Finally, I don't know if the author really knows so much, or if he is from Baidu. Can he stop forcing the article to read while fighting and killing people? I can't stand this kind of protagonist setting.

This book is no worse than "Players Are Fierce", and has a larger layout. The premise is that you can get through the slightly illogical chapters in the previous round. In fact, it is not unacceptable to those who like cool writing.

I used to think that the setting of six gems was so awesome, but in the movie it turned out to be as unappealing as a children's toy. It was eye-opening to see the protagonist use six like this.

I finally finished reading it, but there are a lot of things I don't quite understand. I only know what it is but don't know why. In other words, you may have forgotten it after reading it once. Quantum physics, high-energy physics, cosmic astronomy, human cells, criminal psychology, physiological psychology, moral sociology, religious culture, mythology, quotations from scriptures, and straightforward narratives. The various examples and quotes about science, religion, culture, and human nature make people feel like they are watching a documentary or the Science Channel. It is now so logical to cultivate a fantasy superpower. I have to sigh again, this is indeed the best novel I have ever read about science being truth, and truth defeating all ghosts and ghosts. It feels like reading a science fiction novel.

Did you write Player Fierce? Bujin suspects that this one is too different from your new work. I gave up after reading 10 chapters of this one. Fortunately, you were decisive because the writing of "Player Fierce" is so exciting.

The setting is quite interesting, but one is an old monster who has always lived in Bengbu and practiced for many years. He is proficient in martial arts and has been walking on earth for decades, but he always distorts the character for the plot. He killed several members of the Joker Gang and was eavesdropped by Batman (I don't know why there are bugs in the sewers in the corner. I didn't understand the author's explanation) and came up to confront him. What kind of plot did the author want to arrange? Bateman took down the protagonist? How does the protagonist react? To be fair... As a veteran with hundreds of years of life experience, why does it feel like he is forcing himself to say "I'm a jerk, I'm not afraid of you"? Really, it's very low. This reaction will only make people feel like a passionate young man, which deviates from the protagonist's character set by the author himself. Either he won't give this character at the beginning, and he will abide by it if it is finalized. The second one is these idioms, or four-character words, which are always placed in strange places. The third one is that I suddenly came across this book on my bookshelf today. I don't know why I didn't subscribe to it. I looked at it again. It seems that it was because of what I said before. Forget it, after all, I have read it and rewarded it a little bit. Poisonous, poisonous, destroying everything, even if the writing style is very ordinary but solid and not poisonous, it will be easy to get angry, but I am afraid of poison and can't stand it.