Infinite Hunting Grounds

There are a lot of general principles, but the actual operation is pure nonsense. The Yellow Turban Peasant Revolt was caused by food. In some places, people even ate each other. How did you solve the food problem? You didn't even mention it. You have no problem organizing the army, but how did your lower-level commander emerge? Can you do it with just a few months of training? You must know that the knowledge of the Han Dynasty was in the hands of the nobles. Even those from a poor family were those whose ancestors were wealthy. Most common people may not even be able to count to ten or more

Regarding the wisdom of the protagonist in the book, I feel that if I go to the late Ming or Qing Dynasty and let him take root deeply and start from a refugee, I can definitely write a book that is more popular and more professional than Red Dawn.

What the hell? Who is the protagonist? I'm confused. Forget it. I really don't like team flow.

Many people in the comment area perfectly confirmed the most commonly mentioned point in the book: most people are usually not thinking. As an information output terminal, the amount of information produced by this book is undoubtedly huge and uneven. No matter whether you agree or disagree with the views in it, whether they are inevitable truths or absurd fallacies, as long as you are still thinking, you will definitely gain something. So, why pay attention to the instinctive ramblings of unthinking people? What you should really focus on are the things that make your mind spin. Even if sometimes those things hold completely opposite views to yours, it would be torture for you to read even one more word. But as long as it is a product of thinking, it must have its value.

A few thoughts about this book.          : ，，，， That's the struggle, ****. ****This theme runs throughout the book. Wang Luo struggles with heaven (god), with earth (plot or everything related), with people (contractors), and even with people. Why is it necessary to add the qualifier "politics" before struggle? This is because Wang Luo's means of struggle are basically political or technical. From the beginning there were only a few dozen chapters until now. What attracted me has always been Mao's thought, but now I am tired. Can the author reduce the content about struggle? The essence of Mao's thought is the people. This is Mao's way. What you have been describing is Mao's technique and the technique used in the struggle with the West. Keep the technique but forget the way, putting the cart before the horse. You set a goal for Wang Luo, which is good, but also very bad; when Wang Luo moves step by step towards the goal of sinking wealth and approaches step by step, I am very happy as a reader, so I like the Yellow Cloth, Wormhole, and Cthulhu chapters, but I feel bored in the chapters related to the spirit, which are full of struggle; the spirit is strong, but is it related to the goal you set? Just a little bit, are spirits useful in guiding the human subconscious that you emphasize? Just a little bit related. In my understanding, the spirit is just a plug-in to ensure the abnormal death of the protagonist, nothing more. The solution to the dilemma mainly relies on Wang Luo's political wisdom. Having said so much, there are two main points I want to express: 1. The description of the spirit has been reduced. In my opinion, it is just a somewhat useful thing. The protagonist does not often use it and does not pay attention to it. You spend so much space describing it, but in the end, its usefulness is still vague and indirect. I feel very boring. 2. I hope to add more descriptions of Wang Luo's process of achieving his goal of sinking wealth. Finally, I hope the author will give me some advice after seeing that I have written so much.

A core theme of the book "Infinite Hunting Ground" is robbers and their descendants. If any book friends don't understand, let me explain it here: When talking about this topic, we have to talk about what a robber is. It can be said that banditry is colonialism, imperialism, and great-power chauvinism. In short, their theme is plunder. After plundering, the robbers will be subjected to soul torture from both the outside and the inside 🙂 Yes, it is soul torture. In a group of robbers, when a robber obtains wealth, other robbers, whether they are strong or weak, will try to question the justice of the robber's robbery. This is an external soul torture. Internally, no matter how much the robber commits evil, no matter how much he denies it, he must know in his heart that it is unjust. This is an internal soul torture. For the torture from the outside, the robber's solution is to transfer part of the benefits to other robbers to make other robbers forgive him for what he has done, or to pay hush money. For internal torture, the robbers' choice is to donate money. In the past, one would donate money to the Holy See in exchange for indulgences or be pardoned by the Holy See. Now that the Holy See no longer has such great influence, one would donate money to charitable organizations or even simply create a charity foundation to "donate money" (by the way, evading taxes and leaving inheritance to future generations). In addition, some robbers will also go to church to worship and repent. It is obvious that their so-called "means of atonement" are nothing compared to the evil deeds they committed. Therefore, this process is called "robber philosophy" and is the most important reason why robbers can rob without being jealous of others or having a mental breakdown. When the robbers die and their descendants grow up, two things happen. One is that they inherit the legacy of their fathers and continue to burn, kill and loot. The other is to stop robbing and become mediocre people. For those people who inherited their father's business from son to son, they still acted according to the "gangster philosophy" process, which will not be repeated here. For those mediocre people, they are called "descendants of robbers" by the author because they are no longer robbers. Note that the descendants of robbers mentioned below refer specifically to this group of people. There are two main reasons why the descendants of robbers do not plunder like their fathers. Either their parents left them a large amount of inheritance, allowing them to live and feed without having to rob, or they were too weak to rob others. Let's talk about the first type of people first. The descendants of the first type of robbers, because they have a lot of wealth, will call for peace in order to prevent people who covet their property from robbing them. In this way, they can possess these unjust things as a matter of course and with peace of mind. The second type of robbers' descendants may not necessarily have a lot of property, but their parents gained a lot of enemies (mainly people who were robbed) when they went out to rob. Since they are even too weak to rob, they will be defenseless if those enemies seek revenge on them or rob them in turn. To stop this, they started calling for peace. After these robbers' descendants robbed their homes, they asked others not to do the same thing to them again in order to protect themselves. It is obviously a complete double standard. After the First World War, the ghosts didn't grab enough, and they were still strong, so they only built something called the League of Nations to decorate the facade (and then a certain bald man went crazy and turned this place into a physical store). After World War II, most ghost places were in decline, and they felt that they had robbed enough, so they devoted themselves very much to founding the UN. The most obvious evidence is that there is a huge difference between the League of Nations and the UN. You can search for details on your own. But until now, there is still a ghost place that I haven't looted enough, and it is still powerful. I won't mention the name, but you all know it. In the end, I can only say that all of this is full of routines. November 7, 2019

In a book with obvious political overtones, it is really annoying to include private information.

Author, do you think there are few thoughtful and intelligent people? Quite a few, there are many people who think deeply about it. There are few people who can express it in a simple and logical way, and have the skills to make people want to read on, so that your thinking can be passed down and developed. Either you are in a high position and let the people below consciously study your works and ideas. Either you study how to write the novel well first, so that people will have the desire to read it. The irrelevant thoughts are only about precipitation and writing attitude, which can have influence on this platform, let people read your work happily, bury the private goods cleverly, and achieve a curved road to success. Otherwise, what's the point except for flashy self-pleasure? Why are smart people willing to read your book? There are as many stars as many smarter and more profound works than yours, or do you think that ordinary readers who are unwilling to read and find it unsightly are not smart? Isn't it the duty of a scholar to let people who are trapped in reality gain happiness and gain wisdom from reading, and to think about their own truths? You shouldn't just give a so-called answer sheet to find people who agree, right?

The writing is not great, but the first copy is still interesting because the design is quite pretentious. What was your purpose in writing about Zhou Yingxiong's wife? To make her a disgusting servant? This kind of plot has no character-building effect. In the back, everyone is a weirdo, and there is no normal person. Your protagonist is the only one who was bullied since childhood, but he learned from Mao Xuan and became "great and upright". Then the Yellow Turban piece of shit is so good. While benevolence, righteousness, rationality, and gc-ism are good, a bunch of chicken soup from afar is mixed into it, and the protagonist gets lustful (I can only understand the protagonist's behavior this way) and rapes a caught female contractor, huh? And then what do you want to do by mixing in so many of your own views on gc? I've never seen someone write something as personal as yours.

The author spreads his wisdom and thoughts in the form of novels, and those who can read and understand part of them are destined people. In addition to these philosophical ideas, the plot of the novel is also extremely good. Unfortunately, even those who stayed mostly can't understand the truly wonderful part of the novel. This book does not apply fictional plots to fictional characters to portray characters that do not exist in reality, but writes about personalities that exist in reality. Especially the first scene is absolutely amazing. I wonder how many people can understand why the protagonist sheds tears when the enemy dies.