I pay attention to characterization, so I rate most books based on both characterization and storyline. Science fiction and epic genres are not included in this standard
The author of the cabinet pretends to be dead and keeps updating. His writing is good but his moral character is worrying. He also has problems with his three views. He also likes to directly express his values in the book. He is a head-butt reader. If you don't mind, you can read it and give it to the next one with 3 points.
The writing is fluent, the logic is smooth, the plot is flawless, and the characters are average, but the subject matter is novel, so I added one star.
The writing is smooth and the logic is flawless, but the plot, characters, and world view are all quite satisfactory. It's a good read to pass the time.
The writing is fluent, the logic is smooth, the plot is flawless, and the characters are average, but the subject matter is novel, so I added one star.
The writing is smooth and the logic is flawless, but the plot, characters, and world view are all quite satisfactory. It's a good read to pass the time.
The writing is fluent and the logic is flawless, but the plot, characters, and world view are quite satisfactory, and the later stages are slightly weak and have no new ideas. It is a type that you have to bite the bullet and watch.
The writing is smooth, the logic is flawless, and the plot, characters, and world view are quite satisfactory, but the subject matter is my favorite, so I'll add one star, so four stars.
The writing is fluent, the logic is flawless, and the plot, characters, and world view are all quite satisfactory, but the win is that the world view is outstanding. I will add one and give it four stars.
The writing is fluent, the logic is dead, and the plot has flaws. I would rate it 2 stars, but the subject matter is my favorite (renwai), so I'll add one star.
——
After reading it, I only have one thought: [Love Brain Saves the World]
Professionals should not read it, otherwise you will find that this book uses a technological romance of "power can produce miracles" from beginning to end, presenting you with an unreservedly imaginative... Um, love novel.
The writing is fluent, the logic is smooth, the plot is flawless, the subject matter is novel, and the portrayal of some supporting characters is brilliant. Five stars.
The author of the cabinet pretends to be dead and keeps updating. His writing is good but his moral character is worrisome. He also likes to directly express his values in the book. He is a head-butt reader. If you don't mind, you can read it and give him 3 points for the next one.
The author of the cabinet has a problem with his three views and doesn't want to give any points. The author pretends to be dead and continues to update, and he also likes to express his values directly in the book. He is the kind of person who presses his head to let readers Akaashi, and gives 0 points to the next one.
The writing is fluent, the characters are brilliant, the logic is a little sluggish, and the plot has flaws. It's actually three stars, but the emotion adds one star, so it's four stars.
——
The story of five people saving each other, fitting the characters, easy to heal, highly recommended.
There are highlights in the characterization part, the plot is average, and the writing is smooth. The actual rating is 3.5 Stars, and I give an extra 0.5 Stars for the emotion.
The characterization is average, the plot is average, the writing is fluent, and overall it's quite satisfactory. It's not outstanding but I can't fault it. Three stars.
The plot is average, the characters are average, the writing is fluent, and it's quite satisfactory. There's nothing outstanding but I can't fault it. Three stars.
Drama parties can join.
However, most of the novels I prefer have better characterization than plot. This book did not show that, so it has four stars.
It looks good, the characterization and plot can actually be rated five stars, but because it is written by the same author as the book "Overseas Boy Groups", I hate it, so I deducted one star.
The author of the cabinet pretends to be dead and keeps updating. His writing is good but his moral character is worrisome. He also likes to directly express his values in the book. He is a head-butt reader. If you don't mind, you can read it and give him 3 points for the next one.
The plot is nonsensical and the writing is fluent, but the characterization and plot are not very impressive in comparison. It's just average, three stars.
The characterization is average, the plot is average, and the writing style can only be described as smooth and average. It can be watched if you don't care.
The characterization is average, the plot is average, and the writing style can only be described as smooth and average. It can be watched if you don't care.
The characterization is average, the plot is average, and the writing style can only be described as smooth and average. It can be watched if you don't care.