A Bizarre Marriage Pact with My Ex-Husband's Lover

It amused me. If plq hadn't said anything, I wouldn't have known you posted four posts in a row on vb. Who do you deserve? You committed fraud with your own copywriting. You wrote a new article without writing an outline. Who put a knife to your neck and asked you to write that copywriting before? You feel that no one cares about what you said in Jinjiang, so you went to vb for comfort [666] [666] You know how this article is written? You know the word "satisfaction", so forget it and fool everyone. Don't fool yourself, okay? Everyone knows that your writing style is bad. Take a look for yourself. Is this a bad book? The only element of bad writing is the relationship between three people. Can't you write any other exciting points? You are afraid of others saying that you are not good at writing. You feel that others are "taming" you. Your "self-awareness" is too strong. Will saying this make you feel better? I see plq is just saying that this article is not well written. I feel that I have been deceived by the copywriter. You keep saying in vb that someone is talking about you and attacking you personally. It's inexplicable. Who else wants to read your new article after reading your article? Don't make me laugh, okay? Stop asking for enemies in vain. And who is short of your money? You don't think you are a cool heroine after returning the red envelope. Please give me a tutorial [hug][hug]

It feels like my husband went into the delivery room three hours after the baby came out and asked me whether it was the doctor or the nanny.

"The Magical Engagement with My Ex-husband's Lover" The author's writing style is as good as ever, and the story is well written. In today's general environment, it is really rare to see authors who dare to write imperfect protagonists and impure love stories, but this is probably the reason why this article is not popular. The main reason why I like this article very much is that it completely describes the bones and flesh of the protagonist. This is a main article, and the absolute protagonist is Chu He. In fact, Chu He is a very understanding person from the beginning to the end. He has no material desires, and he is not lacking in love. He has felt love, so he understands what true love is. After his parents passed away, and before he returned to a wealthy family, he understood that he could no longer enjoy and get the love of his family, so what he longed for most was the preference from his lover. Unfortunately, the environment in which he grew up made him too kind, gentle, and innocent, so he would make the decision to sacrifice himself and love because he wanted to save his brothers out of a sense of responsibility. Even though he would vomit due to close contact at the beginning of his relationship, he has been working hard to adapt and transform himself. However, this kind of dedication has not been rewarded, and he has devoted all his efforts to it. Bu's lover is a selfish, weak, cowardly, blind person. When his "daughter" appeared, he was biased towards his "daughter". Chu He tried hard to keep her at first, but in the end he failed. He found that he could not get the preference of his lover, nor could he get the love he imagined, so he had his first self-destructive tendency: suicidal thoughts, and saving the little girl. But at this time, he accidentally lost his memory. During this period of amnesia, his self-destructive tendency still existed, so he began to abandon his first good character, which was kindness. He subconsciously chose to join the chaotic love triangle between Meng and Tang. He has been torturing these two people unconsciously, and he derives pleasure from the unobvious "evil" in his heart. But in the process, he discovered the romance and obedience embodied in Meng, and he developed a good impression of Meng. Coupled with his strong sense of responsibility, he began to save himself for the first time - driving away Tang and getting engaged to Meng in exchange for a love that could grow old together. But unfortunately, he recovered his memory, which was almost devastating to him, even more hurt than the first betrayal. After this injury, he abandoned his second beautiful character-responsibility. He no longer had any scruples and began to take revenge. In the revenge stage, because of his brother's company, he regained his confidence in life and began to save himself for the second time - going abroad, and then staying with his brother all day long, hoping to gain family favor. As a result, because his brother gave him away on his own initiative, and because his father and Meng had an exchange of interests, and his brother did not stop him, Chu He found that he could not get his brother's favor, and his father was his first choice. Not only his brother, but everyone in the Chu family was the same. So Chu He sadly discovered that when he returned to a wealthy family, he seemed to have gained what many ordinary people longed for most - money and power, but he had indeed lost everything he valued, including the hope of getting love. So he lost all his good qualities - his modesty, prudence, gentleness, pursuit of love and purity as an ordinary person. So he had his third self-destructive tendency. He completely destroyed Chu He, who was once an ordinary person, and began to completely degenerate. He supported his lover, lived in luxury every day, and used power and money wantonly. At this point - the male fall is completed. The story ends with a somewhat cliched happy ending. Of course, it is also possible that Chu He did not abandon his most important core. Because of Meng's desperate move, Chu He noticed Meng's preference for him, so he launched a third self-rescue - dismissing his lover and returning to normal life. There was still a lot I wanted to say, but in the end it was reduced to one sentence: Thank you to the author An Ritian for his willingness and persistence to finish writing this story, and for not forcibly distorting their characters or tampering with the story of Chu He because of outside voices.

I don't comment on you in vb because the article started from this article and ended with this article, and was written on this platform, so I posted it here. It has nothing to do with how much the article costs. You proposed this jjb and wrote it into the copy first, and then returned it to you after reading it. Many readers of this article also made suggestions at the beginning. You said that you read every comment, and you also wrote that you respect the readers' right to comment. Later, because the comments broke the protection of cross-platforms, you were promoted. So why didn't you reply to the readers below the article? Also not commenting on vb, I feel that many of the people who responded to you in the comment area have not read this article in its entirety. Whether it is copywriting fraud or 1v1 to 1v2, no one will find it acceptable... Readers who have read this article will know what type of author you are, and they also want to see how you do it. If you don't want to go back, you can just say it, if someone else would have been scolded if the copywriter defrauded 1v1 and turned it into 1v2. Now the comments are saying that the characters and plot are always criticized, so wasn't this ending written just to get back at the readers? To be fair, the character and plot logic are really inconsistent. Early readers thought about the logic and made foreshadowings, but many of them were not recycled. Readers post in the comment area, and then you don't reply in the comment area, but go to vb to cry first. Isn't this too double standard? If you feel that you are unhappy about the character in the comment area at the beginning, why don't you stop it? You feel wronged, the readers feel wronged too, get a red envelope in the end, and then disappear? Of course, this is a two-way article. In fact, I have basically subscribed to all of your articles on other platforms. There are characters that I like very much, and there are also articles that I only like the plot but not the protagonist. But I have never posted comments so frequently about plot and character issues, because you can always come back to them. Jj I didn't read some of the attributes because they didn't suit my preferences. I finally saw you writing a replacement article. I was really looking forward to it when I saw the copywriting, and finally ended up writing it like this. I still want to say that many of the people who can read your article are your readers, and appreciate your style. This article is not in good condition, so let's move on to the next article. But maybe you don't expect this group of readers. In the end, you will only be left with revenge on readers, disgust, red envelopes and disappearance [laughing and crying]

I was disappointed. I stopped reading it for a long time, and then re-read it after the college entrance examination. Because I had read your first few articles before and I don't like reading the comment section, I just ordered them all. I don't understand why you wrote such a strange thing, and I don't understand when you wrote this ending. Are you thinking about Chuhe or those two self-righteous people? Chuhe ended in such a hazy way. I don't know how you wrote the next few books. Goodbye Jianghu... Your copywriting is different from your original intention. You can't do it. I just hope you will stop selling sheep's meat to dog meat. What you have damaged is the trust of old readers in you. This can be considered as I have gained wisdom after seeing it. Goodbye Jianghu...

In fact, after reading it in one go, I didn't have the same unacceptable emotions as in the comment section. I felt like I was being fed into an AI and was beaten inexplicably. I now feel the emptiness I feel after a catastrophic disaster, sitting in front of a burned-out house and looking into the distance. Who am I, where am I, what am I doing, where is the end of the universe, and how did things become like this step by step?

I remember in the early stage of this article, didn't there be a comment from the author saying he would defend every reader's opinion? No matter how dissatisfied everyone was in the early stage, it was because of the characters in your article. If your writing is a mess later on, do you still blame readers for being too sharp in their comments? Who would have known about your copywriting scam before reading this article? Who among the current readers has not read your previous works? A "Chasing Love Crematorium" tag deceived readers into following the full text, and ended up with a reputation as a masochist who didn't run away early... You said readers criticized you, do you want to see what other authors would be like if they wrote hzc and ended up like this? Can the fact that you are good at writing gory-style novels cover up the fact that your copywriting is fraudulent and your content is just like a hodgepodge of old stories? This is how the dog blood label is used. Even in the first part of the finale, people only raised questions about your unreasonable writing. How many of you personally raised it? I also asked why I didn't go to WB to confront you. Your article is not good. Is there any problem with readers raising questions in the jj comment area? If you want to confront readers, why don't you reply directly in the jj comment area? When the whole platform confronts you, I will say that the readers will bao you... Your plq people directly opened map cannons and said g/k because of your vb content. It is so extreme. Then I hope the gentle s/k sisters can protect you and let you write the main article with peace of mind. [Poor] In the end, you said that you should not talk, but the characters in your works actually don't talk, right? Chu Hesheng is in great misfortune under the writing of a mother like you.

Okay, let's skip to the last chapter. I can say with absolute certainty that I have broken through the stone.

Because I jumped into a new pit, I went back and finished this book... The character creation is really weak. I was deceived by the copywriting and read all the way like a donkey with the "crematorium" carrot above my head. In the early stage, I would be angry at the actions of the characters in the book. In the later stage, I was just confused and inexplicably funny. At the very least, changing the copywriting will prevent subsequent people from being defrauded again. The new article will still support my appetite, but I have to change my habit of reading to the end of a certain article... The only article I have read is the 2,000-meter article [covering my face and laughing and crying] I don't have to say anything. The new article should be well written, and be gentle to the protagonist. Stop being like Chu He, who looks around and no one is sincere to him.

In fact, I think it's okay. I insist that the author has the right to interpret the characters and plots. Although it is not perfect in my mind, I think this is the best explanation given by the author. I always hope that Chu can have a better person, but fate dictates that I will hallucinate Chu like those love brains, trying to persuade them to break up, but he is always too kind. The author used his power and status to give him the opportunity to make a choice, but he is a person who misses love, otherwise he would not have chosen to be with Chen Ming even though he was not gay. I also admire the author's courage in self-analysis. In an era when the Internet is so violent, it is not easy to be so honest. Congratulations on the end. I originally thought I would change the cp, but I didn't expect it to be 1v2. My expectations for Chen Ming were also realized. He just looked at Chu and didn't love him, and Meng's life was nourishing. It feels very much like the author's previous style. In fact, some people say that Chu fell in love for no reason, but I think it's quite normal? I had this idea when I read the author's articles before, especially the one about Gentle Knife...